I've worked on this essay,
off and on, for the last several weeks, since not long after
the show closed. I did not intend on it being such a tome,
yet here we are. I commend you if you have the attention
span or the perseverance/patience/tolerance to read the whole
verbose, self-indulgent, rambling opus. I recommend grabbing
a cup of coffee, maybe a double-or-tripple-shot espresso....
My first outing as
director
of a pure,
fully-staged theatre production,
Wednesday's Child,
by Mark St. Germain,
has wrapped.
So now we get to the happy/sad part of the theatre experience. The
set is gone; the universe of Becca, Susan, Martin, Dixon, Valez,
Strutt, and Sam has dissolved into the void. The next production at
The Guild is
in rehearsal
and closing in on Opening Night,
and "my" show has, for the last six weeks, been that inevitable
dark
that comes with the transient nature of theatre.
Now that it's been a month-and-a-half since Wednesday's Child
closed, I hope I have perhaps a better perspective on this
experience, and can make some more reasonable and clear-headed
observations and comments.
By and large I am happy with the experience. Overall I feel like it
was an overwhelming success and a successful venture for me. Certainly,
it was a success for everyone else involved. But if I were to give
myself a grade as director, I can't see anything higher than a B,
which may be too high ‐‐ perhaps a B‐ at the most.
This is the reason for the "Today's Quote:" meme image,
which had popped up on my facebook
feed just at the oppertune time, that being when I was first made
aware of one of the bigger fails of mine, the one that bothered me
the most, though I later realized that I was being a tad too harsh
on myself. I don't know with whom to credit the words on that whiteboard
in the meme image, but they were the right words at the right time,
and though they didn't wholly alleviate how crestfallen I felt at
the time, the depth of the fall I felt was made shallower as I somewhat
took the sentiment to heart. Before I get into specifics, there are
a few other thoughts I have about the process as a whole.
My other directing credit for "the stage" is the Summer,
2021 Guild mounting of
The Roommate,
by Jen Silverman. But
that was a
streaming production,
a hybrid between a motion picture production and a stage production.
There are many, many differences between the two, loads of differences.
There are also ways in which they are most similar. The profound
way is that in no way is it a one-person job for the director,
especially if the production is a success, artistically or financially.
Of Course, like film directors, theatre directors need to have a
vision for the script they are charged to bring to life. So their
fundamental task is to guide the project toward their vision
‐‐ let's assume the vision is worth heading toward.
Whatever the vision is, the director needs a good production team
and a good cast to see that vision come to fruition.
IF, indeed, the vision is worth heading toward, if it's
worth realizing, then there should be some measure of loftiness to
that vision, that goal. I believe my vision for Wednesday's
Child had some loftiness, not a spectacularly large amount,
but enough. But I could not have reach my goals without the skills
and talents of others. Before I get into that, let's look at my
"vision," my goals for this play.
For one, I wanted to make sure the action moved quickly, which frankly
should always be the goal, but this one needed as little time as
possible in between the many scenes because of the nature of the
story. With certain passages of the script this was easy to
achieve since, by design of the text, there were actors in different
locations on stage during concurrent scenes, waiting in
soft freeze
for their cues to speak and be the focus while their counterparts
went into soft freeze on the other part of the stage; and back and
forth this would go, with lights-up/lights-down changes accompanying.
Other scene changes, the genuine scene changes, where one ends and
another follows, were where we needed to be clever with the staging
to keep things moving. Some of those changes were to go to flashback
scenes, taking the audience back in time, then bringing them back
when the scene was over. Often, at least one character was in the
previous, the flash-back, then the following scene. So one thing I
knew early on was there were not going to be costume changes as I
did not want to drag out the scene transitions to accommodate them.
I had our
costumer,
Barb Jorgensen, put all the characters in a representative costume
that they wore for the whole show. However, actually, there were
a few costume changes, most of them dealing with the character Becca
(Kayleen Nordyke). For two scenes, she changed from her black top
and black slacks into a medical gown for scenes where that would be
relevant. In another scene, her character and the character of Samantha
(Heather Atkinson) were in bathrobes. The only other times we were
even close to costume changes were when the lawyer, Strutt (Becky
Howard) and the detectives, Dixon (Jamie McQuinn) and Valez (Ghiovanna
Dennis), had their jackets off for a scene or portions of one.
If you follow this blog any you may know that I wrote and recorded
all the production music
for this, save for the music out of Act 1 and the
curtain call music.
Becca, the murder victim, has several
monologues
spoken from the afterlife, described in the script as from
"somewhere past time." For those, I had some music I created
back in 2014, originally as
preshow music
for the Dayton Playhouse
production of
George A. Romero's Night of the Living Dead™ Live.
There are five different tracks and for Wednesday's Child I
used them as
underscore
for the five monologues, one for each. These five pieces, which are
all actually eight minutes long, with only a fraction being used as
the underscore here, all have the audio of interstellar bodies,
that which was recorded by NASA
with radio telescopes.
There's a nice array of sound used in the five peaces, with such
titles as: "Earth," "Jupiter," "Saturn,"
"Saturn's Rings," "Sphere of Io," and
"Uranus." Back in 2014, when I produced these pieces I
added atmospheric notes or chords with keyboard pluggins from
GarageBand.
For this project I
remastered
all five recordings which I was already planning to do for reasons
not related to this show.
For the scene transitions I composed and recorded bass guitar work
for all but the transitions into the flashback scenes. For those, I
composed and recorded a piece of music with a GarageBand synthesizer
pluggin called Echolocation Synth, with three different tempos, moving
from the fastest for early flashbacks to the slowest for the late,
Act 2 flashbacks.
My system for composing and recording each scene transition was to
go through the script, read the end of a scene, then the start of the
next and come up with something, on the spot, that fit the appropriate
mood and energy. I just went from start to finish in the script,
over the course of several different recording sessions. All of the
work is instrumental, most of it is only one bass, either my
Embassy Pro
or my Vintage Sunburst Viola.
A few have two or more basses on the track, usually both the Embassy
and the Viola. A few of the pieces have percussion, two of those
being me tapping on deadened bass strings, both those for music coming
out of scenes with a sexual component. One other piece has a
programmed GarageBand drum kit for an upbeat instrumental expressing
joy.
Since the actors/characters did not do costume changes for the
flashback scenes, I needed music that clued in the audience that
we were going into such flashback scenes, something consistent that
set a precedent. My original idea was to have bass work that was
played backward and I recorded such for each such transition
‐‐ individual bass lines for each transition. When I was
in the booth,
programming the sound cues into Show Cue Systems,
playing the cues back through the theatre sound system as I was
adding them, I increasingly thought that these little
backward-playback bass riffs were not working. I took a break from
programming to create something better as cues to the flashbacks. I
opened GarageBand on my laptop
and experimented with various instrument pluggins and composition
attempts until I finally came across a composition using the
Echolocation Synth pluggin that worked. As I wrote above, I rendered
that composition at three different tempos, having it be the same
melody and rhythm but at different speeds for gradual use from
the faster at the first, to the slowest by the end of the play.
All of this
scene-change music,
and the Becca monologue underscoring, all by me, was instrumental.
The rest of the music, the background production music (playing on
the sound system in Becca's apartment and in the bar scene), as
well as the
pre-show music,
the intermission music,
the music that took us out of Act 1, and the curtain call music,
had vocals (with lyrics). For all of this music I used female
artists, or bands with a female front-woman. I can't fully explain
why I decided to go this route. The two male characters in the story
are not at all insignificant to the story nor the action. But my
instinct was for the music with vocals to be from females. There's
certainly a masculine energy to the scene change music, which was
written and performed by a man, some of it quite in the realm of
progressive rock. Maybe this was my subconscious balancing out the
energies.
One final note on my sound design (music) choices: I had a specific
song in mind to take us out of Act 1, but the original, famous
version is by a prominent male rock band. Yet I really wanted to
use that song. It took me a while, but I found a cover with a woman
at the mic, and a really nice cover version, at that.
I'm well satisfied with my sound work for this show, both the
composing and performance of the original work and my curation of
the other music. I did have one audience member complain to me about
the ambient sound
in some of the scenes, and rather angrily, too. I was told that the
ambient sound was unnecessary. I politely thank that audience
member for the feedback, but silently disagreed with the assessment
but with the caveat that volume may have been an issue. You can,
however, be quite sure that I absolutely disagreed with the idea that
the ambient sound was "unnecessary."
Now finally getting directly to my thoughts about my direction. Like
I suggested above, overall I feel pretty good about my work on this
show. I believe I did a lot of things right and made a lot of good,
smart decisions. I can look back and see some weaknesses and some
errors, but I believe my successes outweigh my errors.
One of the things I am positive I got right was doing
table work
with the cast, early on. Our first night of rehearsal was the
standard read-through,
then the next two nights we did more in-depth table work, stopping
whenever anyone had a comment or question about anything concerning
the text or the characters. Any one could make a comment on anything,
including their observations or queries about another actor's character.
I certainly made some observations and posed some questions. So did
the entire cast. Character work
was certainly jumpstarted during those two sessions (one night for
each act), as was script analysis.
I did this for The Roommate, and it will always be a part of
my arsenal as a director.
Another decision I made, early on, weeks before we held the
auditions
was that it would be wise for me to bring in an
intimacy coordinator.
There were several scenes, two in particular, one of those quite
glaring, where I wanted to be sure there was some strong sexual tension
and innuendo as a key energy in the scene. For one scene in particular
I really wanted a strong sexual energy without it getting to the
point of being sexually explicit, yet I wanted it pretty damned close
to the sexually explicit line without crossing it. The other scene
absolutely needed a strong, obvious sexual component. I knew what I
wanted from those scenes, but I also wanted to ensure that the
actors felt comfortable and safe in their journeys to get to these
places, and to be comfortable and safe as they performed the scenes
in front of an audience. Perhaps I could have gotten them there
on my own, with them being comfortable and feeling safe, but there's
now a structured, well-thought-out procedure for this, and I don't
have that training. I contacted Joe Deer,
from the
School of Fine and Performing Arts at Wright State University
for recommendations. Who I went with was
Marya Spring Cordes,
Associate Chair and Artistic Director of that WSU School of Fine and
Performing Arts. Marya, though not technically certified as an intimacy
coordinator (or intimacy director), has the training in this
skill, and her contribution to our show was vital. One of the actors
made a point to let me know how much she appreciated Marya being brought
in, and I got the sense the other actors agreed. I definitely got
what I wanted in those scenes, and without anyone feeling intimidated,
harassed or objectified.
That decision to nix costumes changes, save for a few key ones that
were important to the story (which Barb Jorgensen rightly said were
really more props than costumes because of their purpose), that
decision was another good one on my part. Again, the nature of the
script demands a quick pace and often a character was going from
one scene to the next, the latter being a different point in time,
and allowing time for costume changes would have unnecessarily
dragged on the momentum.
My point of contention with my work was about poor communication in
a few places. One instance was a scene where I wanted a specific
tension and energy and it took me a little while to successfully
communicate that to the actor who had to drive that tension and the
particular uncomfortable energy the scene needed. The actor finally
came to me, a little distressed that they could tell they weren't
giving me what I wanted. We had a private talk about it and worked
the scene a few times and it finally landed.
Another communication problem I had was not strongly enough driving
the point home that the "intimacy" of
The Guild'sthrust-stage
theatre is deceptive in terms of how loud an actor must be on stage.
For one thing, the acoustics are less than perfect, and there are
dead spots. Plus, many actors are not familiar with working a thrust
stage, and they aren't conditioned to think about how they have to
project
their voices for the audience members who are behind them at any
given time. It's also instinctive for them to want to bring the volume
down when they are up close (right on top) of a portion of the
audience, forgetting that they have to be heard by audience members
on the other side of the theatre space. I made these points,
repeatedly in my notes
during rehearsal. What I didn't think to do was offer any sort of
coaching on the topic ‐‐ next time, that will happen
unless I have nothing but DTG, thrust-stage veterans in the cast.
My communication was a mixed bag. Though I had some inequities, I
believe there were other times I did pretty damned well. One example
that comes to mind is that a couple of the actors had verbal cadences
going on at the start that were simply not going to work for the
characters. I address it immediately, saying essentially, "We've
got to break you away from that." I gave one actor a few
suggestions including a television actor whose speech pattern and
delivery might be a good model. We also spent some time talking
about the character's overall attitude. The other actor, I just keep
giving the note that the cadence issue was still there, and eventually
it went away. I think all these things, as well as the actors' own
intuitions, gave the characters the personas the show needed.
I also gave a couple of the actors far fewer notes than others. It
was because, by and large, I was happy with what they were doing.
I tried to occasionally let them know this, but I think I could
have done so more often.
In an advanced acting class I took through
The Human Race Theatre Company,
the late, great Marsha Hanna,
told the class that the job of a director isn't to tell the actors
how to play their roles, but to help the actor find the character,
the person in the text, in the role. I think, ultimately, I did that.
I hope I did. It seems I did. We had conversations about emotional
life, mental states, psyche, and motivations. I certainly tried to
listen to their ideas about their characters, and they had some good,
smart ideas. They even had some good suggestions about
blocking.
Going back to what Marsha told us in that class, the director needs
to collaborate with the actors, and I tried my damndest to do that.
The great thing was that I had such a strong cast. I said this
every performance during the
curtain speech:
that I was extremely fortunate to have the cast that I had. All of
the actors were so well-suited for their roles. In a few cases, I
had other choices from the auditions
who would have worked, but the particular cast I did choose was
about as close to perfect as I could have asked for. And I was so
very pleased that of the seven actors on the stage, five of them
were new to a Guild production. Two of them I was familiar with;
three of the them I had never seen or known of before auditions. The
remaining two, were, of course, Guild veterans. Those seven actors
rocked it! As I wrote in my director's notes for the playbill:
....if this production is an artistic success, the talent,
the instincts, and the insights of these actors play as much
a part as any other element....
That goes for the production staff for the show, too. The top-notch
expertises and skills of
Production Stage Manager
Doug Patton, Lighting Designer
Marjorie Strader, Scenic Designer
Red Newman, Costume Designer Barb Jorgensen, and
Properties Coordinator
Sarah Saunders all brought my vision to life, and in some
cases amended or altered the vision for something better, something
more interesting. Let me also not forget our two hard-working
stage crew
members. One of them, Christina Tomazinis (whose husband is our
Jamie McQuinn [Det. Dixon], and who is also the current chairperson
of our DTG board) was not officially designated as
assistant stage manager,
but, really, she was the ASM. Our other run crew member was Alexis
Hirst, daughter of Ghiovanna Dennis (Det. Valez). If ya wanna smooth
production, ya gotta have a good run crew. We did.
In another realm of striving toward my director's vision, though I
had a very fine props person in Sarah, a fellow DTG board member
(and also the
sound technician
for the production), I did take a few executive actions for particular
props, mostly dealing with our two detectives. First, though they
never draw their guns in the play, I did want them to wear their
guns for the audience to see. We didn't have correct holsters in
our props inventory for the purpose, so I personally procured the
appropriate ones. I got a shoulder holster for Dixon (Jamie McQuinn)
and a belt holster for Valez (Ghiovanna Dennis). Fortunately we do
have some most authentic-looking blank guns in our possession, one
that looks like a standard, five-chamber .38 revolver and one that
is a replica of 9 mm pistol. We gave the .38 to Dixon, the old-school
cop, and the 9 mil to Valez, the younger protégé. I
bought holsters tailored to the guns.
The other cop prop issue was their detective's gold shields. First,
I did some in-depth searching for gold shields on the internet. Much
of what I found were toys and quite toy-looking. I did find some gold
shield prop badges, but they all had city or municipality identification
on them, and I didn't want any exact location for the setting. The
program said, "upstate New York," and that was as definitive
as I wanted it. With the stage setup for this show, both detectives
were often within arms reach of the audience, so it would be easy for
audience members to read the badges ‐‐ Valez's was on badge
holder on a neck chain and Dixon's was on a badge holder on his belt.
I did find a couple sites where you order custom-made gold shields,
but the cost was prohibitive. I then went to a Dayton area facebook
theatre community page asking if anyone had what I needed and could
loan them out. No one did, but a couple people suggested we try
making the badges via
3D printing.
That was the rout we went, and as it turns out, our PSM, Doug just
happens to own a
3D printer
and is appropriately familiar with its use. He was able to create
two polyvinyl badges that were perfect for our needs. Then, Guild
board member, actor and graphic artist Wendi Michael (who was seen
last season as Kate to my Jack in the Guild's mounting of
Broadway Bound)
painted the shields gold and added lettering. The badges came out
wonderfully.
I also personally handle the creation of two crime scene photos
props. One was photograph of print that hung on Becca's refrigerator
in her apartment. The print is of an archeological piece that
is a mosaic, which the script identifies as "The Madonna of
Galilee," but my research shows it being titled "The
Mona Lisa of Galilee." That prop was
down stage
on Dixon's desk in the police bullpen area of our Wednesday's
Child set, just feet from the audience and easily seen by such.
The other was a crime scene photo of Becca lying lifeless on her
floor in a pool of blood. That one was probably barely ever seen
and likely not seen well by any audience members. However, at one
point Dixon opened a folder to show the photo to a lawyer and there
was a chance that some audience members could at least partially
see the contents of the open folder. I did not want them spying
an obvious type-written page, a blank one, or other visual that was
not the murder victim. Even if they saw very little, I wanted
them to see something that looked like what Dixon said it was.
There were a few other props I provided due to easy, convenient access
on my part. But the big bulk of the props were hunted down or procured
by Sarah. And she is who is responsible for one of the
most important props for the show, an Israeli stone called a
meleke (the script
spells it "meleki"). Her father, Dave Therkelson,
has a rock garden and one of the limestones in that garden has the
perfect look and size for our needs for the "meleki,"
so, Dave graciously loaned us that stone for the show.
And, our costumer, Barb. Well, she just knows what the heck she's
doing!
Now: Red's set. It was not at all like what I had originally envisioned
or planned on. My original idea was for the set to be pretty much
a black box set
with probably no walls or any region of the stage defined as any
sort of geographical location. There would be minimal
set pieces,
more minimal than what we ended up with, that would come on and go
off stage as needed. Likewise, the
props
would be as minimal as possible. Red's five-level platform set
idea changed all that. It certainly was more interesting than what
I had in mind. I went with it. I did find some of the blocking to
be a challenge on Red's design and in retrospect what I learned was
that before I give a set my stamp of approval I need to more rigorously
think out such things as how it will be to block on. Now, I must say
here that Red gave me plenty of time to approve or reject any and all
of his proposed set. He made it clear that he would change anything
to suit my needs. None of the blocking issues that I was never
satisfied were completely resolved can be blamed on Red. I accepted
the set so all the issues are on me. And, the set did look cool
and was certainly interesting to look at and play on.
One of the things I love about theatre is the little show gifts
cast and crew give out to each other. Even something as simple as
a thank-you card with a sweet little note in it is a precious
souvenir that I cherish. My gift to cast and crew is usually a
6x4 or 7x5 card that I've designed with a personalized note on the
back. You'll see my 5x7 to the cast and crew below at the end of
the pictures.
My director's gift from the cast was a lovely one. Quite a few years
ago, I came across a textbook on acting in the collection at
the day job,
How to Stop Acting,
by Harold Guskin.
The title caught my attention as I had already been a disciple of
the acting philosophy of "Less acting, More Being."
I checked it out and found it very instructive and have repeatedly
checked it out several times over the years. I frequently refer
to it when discussing acting and certainly made reference to it
while directing this show, as well as when I directed The
Roommate. I always say how I need to break down and actually
buy a copy rather than always relying on it being available for
checkout from the library when I want to go back and refresh myself.
The cast gave me a copy of the book as my gift, which I suspect was
spearheaded by Mr. McQuinn, who is a librarian. They all wrote
lovely little notes in it and I am quite touched by the gesture and
the sentiments.
Yep, it takes a village to put on a great show. The members of the
Wednesday's Child village, from the actors to all the production
staff and crew came together to make an excellent show. For myself,
there are things I'd do differently with my hindsight, but, overall,
I am quite pleased and so greatful I had the amazing company of
people I had to mount this wonderful production.
The DTG Wednesday's
Child Company
back row (L-R): Doug Patten (Stage manager &
Lighting Technician), Ghiovanna Dennis (Det. Aleece
Valez), Jamie McQuinn (Det. Walt Dixon), Stephanie
Henry (Susan Merrit), Ryan Hester (Martin Merrit),
Becky Howard (Molly Strutt), Barbara Jorgensen
(Costumer), Sarah Saunders (Properties & Sound
Technician), Red Newman (Scenic Designer), Alexis
Hirst (Stage Crew)
The crime scene photo of "The Madonna
of Galilee," taped to Becca Conner's
refrigerator in her apartment ‐‐
easily visible to audience members as it
lay on Dixon's desk, down stage on our
thrust.
The crime scene photo of Becca Conner,
post mortem ‐‐ which I hope was
at least somewhat glanced by a few audience
members during its brief appearance.
The Wednesday's Child "Meleki,"
courtesy of Dave Therkelson.
The cast's gift to me.
The dorky director faking a curtain speech
during a rehearsal.
I've been reading play scripts, and I'm not done. So far, I've read
the six shows that are our
Dayton Theatre Guild
2024/2025 season, with an eye toward both throwing my hat in the
ring as director,
and, of course, looking for any roles that I might target to
audition
for. I have some choices in both categories. That certainly doesn't
exclude my going after shows at other theatres, especially as an
actor, but I haven't focused on such yet.
I'll admit that as I read the DTG slate, I thought about the
sound design:
How would I do that? Do I have that sound in my
SFX library?
Would that have to be new
Foley
or something I'd have to
build?
I mean, ya know, history has proven that I'll likely end up
designing one (or several) of the productions.
I also still have some manuscripts by theatre colleagues to read
then provide the playwrights with my feedback, for whatever that
would be worth.
SOUND:
I sat in on last night's
full run rehearsal,
both as
producer
and as
sound designer,
with emphasis on the latter. It was my chance to audit the performance
to determine the moods and energies going in and out of scenes to
better curate the music for each scene transition. It was the time
to discuss certain specifics of
sound effects
with our
director,
Doug Lloyd, too.
Photos from last night's rehearsal:
Jared Mola (Lee) & Ryan Hester (Austin)
Ryan, Jared, & Philip Trickey (Saul)
Libby Holley Scancarello (Mom), Jared, &
Ryan
AN INTERESTING SHOW FROM DENMARK:
A couple weeks ago I stumbled across a Danish horror series on
Netflix titled Elves
(Nisser in Danish), which caught my attention and I added it
to my queue. A few days ago, I watched the
pilot
and I find the show interesting, so far. At this point it seems
somewhat in the vain of
Speilberg'sET, but
that assessment may change as I watch more episodes.
Hoping to reconnect over Christmas, a family of four travels
to a remote island in the Danish archipelago, only to find
it controlled by members of a strongly religious community
living in balance with fierce creatures in the woods revealed
to be ‐‐ elves. Real, monstrous beings that inspired
the folklore and myths we all know. When the girl in the
family finds and brings home a baby elf, she inadvertently
disrupts the balance and throws everyone on the island into
a life-or-death battle for faith, family, and pure survival.
The only obstacle here as far as me successfully watching this show
is that, though it's fortunately not
dubbed,
I hate language-dubbed productions, it does have
subtitles,
which means that my frequent habit of attending to other activities
while I watch TV won't be tenable because I will need to pay attention
to the screen. Same problem I had with the original French production
of The Returned,
which is why I only saw a few episodes, even though I thoroughly
enjoyed what I saw.
Today is Tech Sunday,
the official start of
Tech Week.
And, of course, this coming Friday is
Opening Night.
Judging by the
full run rehearsal
I witnessed this past Wednesday, the cast is more than ready. The
tech run
today is only going to super-charge what's already there. We have a
dry tech
in the early afternoon, followed by that first full tech run with
the cast.
As is common for a DTG production where I do the
soundwork,
I spent a good portion of yesterday, (the day before Tech Sunday),
at the theatre, in the
booth,
programming the sound cues for the show into the
True West
project file in Show Cue Systems.
Though some decisions about
production music
had already been made ‐‐ (on Wednesday night when I
watched the rehearsal) ‐‐ most decions were made
yesterday. What was already determined was the ins and outs of both
acts. Watching the run Wednesday brought me to decide what the sound
should be at the start of the show: it won't be a song. I've also
known for a while what music takes us out of Act 1. Going into Act
2 we will be using the music I had initially thought would be good
at the top of Act 1. My first choice for the
curtain call music
has maintained its stature, though I've tweaked the presentation
to better facilitate the drama in the last moments of the end of
the act.
What I chose yesterday was the
scene-transition music,
from among some candidates I had already culled as being highly
potential, and my choices were influenced by the mood and feel of
those scene transition moments as generated by the actors' performances
last Wednesday. Plus, of course, as I was programming, I made the
decisions about the execution and affectation of the general
sound-effectsound cues.
Any of these choices could be nixed by
Doug Lloyd,
or he could ask for modifications, but, other than those usual
variables ‐‐ plus my inevitable tweaking of volumes, etc.
‐‐ the sound design is finished.
Tomorrow night I'll shoot the
principal footage
for the show's on-line
promotional trailer.
There'll be no dialogue from the script in the trailer as I did not
secure clearance to use any. As is the case in this situation, rather
than shooting moments played specifically for the camera, I'll simply
shoot footage during the regularly scheduled
dress/tech
and edit the DV movie from that, minus audio.
I have booked another gig playing a witness for a
U.D. Law School mock
trial session in early February. This will be the usual
guided improv
gig where I will be provided with case facts and my responses will
be limited the scope of that information. I do not know of this is
a case I have done before or if it's new. I should be getting the
info packet shortly from the actors' coordinator, Fran Pesch.
Here we are at
Opening Night.
It was a relatively uneventful
tech week,
with the
tech runs
going well. The cast is clearly ready for tonight; they have been
all week, really. Meanwhile, it was a virtually smooth tech week for
my soundwork,
too, with only the usual tweaks, mostly to volume levels. And, as
you can see from the link below, the
promotional trailer
made it to final cut
and onto the
DTG YouTube channel.
The 2023/2024 season at The Guild
has simply rocked thus far.
True West
is the next installment in what has been, and I wager will continue
to be, an awesome season. If you are or will be in the Dayton, Ohio
area between now and the 28th, I highly suggest ‐‐ with
only a little bias entering the recommendation ‐‐ that you
come check it out!
As we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead. We
cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil
rights, "When will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied
as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police
brutality. We can never be satisfied, as long as our bodies, heavy with the
fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and
the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro's
basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be
satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their selfhood and robbed
of their dignity by signs stating "For Whites Only". We cannot be
satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New
York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not
satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like
waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.
I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and
tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of
you have come from areas where your quest for freedom left you battered by
the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality.
You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the
faith that unearned suffering is redemptive.
Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go
back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of
our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be
changed. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair.
I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of
today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in
the American dream.
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true
meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that
all men are created equal."
I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former
slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together
at the table of brotherhood.
I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state
sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of
oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation
where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content
of their character.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists,
with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition
and nullification; one day right there in Alabama, little black boys and
black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white
girls as sisters and brothers.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and
mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the
crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be
revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.
This is our hope. This is the faith that I go back to the South with. With
this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of
hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of
our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will
be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to
jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be
free one day.
This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with a
new meaning, "My country, 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee
I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim's pride, from every
mountainside, let freedom ring."
And if America is to be a great nation this must become true. So let freedom
ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from
the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening
Alleghenies of Pennsylvania!
Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado!
Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California!
But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia!
Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee!
Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi. From every
mountainside, let freedom ring.
And when this happens, when we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring
from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we
will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and
white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to
join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "Free at
last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!"
The On-Liner Notes essay for
"Into the Blue Dawn"
is finally
posted. I have now written commentary on all the tracks related to
the Virtually Approximate Subterfuge
album. Until something else is released there probably won't be
anything added to the page. However, there are things in the
can, and there's a major project from the distant past that needs
mixing and
mastering.
A release, or two, might be happening sometime during 2024. Can't
say when any On-Liner Notes essays would show up.
Meanwhile, CLICK HERE
for the "Into the Blue Dawn" essay.
FIRST WEEKEND DOWN:
The show's opening weekend went exceptionally well.
I was there both Friday,
Opening Night,
and Saturday, though, as is often usual first weekend, I could not
attend too much to the performance either night because I was in my
default mode as the
house manager,
plus, on Friday, Opening Night Gala
facilitator. However, I did catch moments here and there and the cast
was always rockin' it during those moments. And the audience raved
afterward both nights, and Friday a significant percentage of the
crowd stay for the gala ‐‐ that last point being an
unscientific but arguably reasonable indicator of the strong artistic
success of the evening. It was a small audience Saturday, but
their response was as enthusiastic as it was Friday. I wasn't there
yesterday, but the reports are that things went just as well as
the first two shows.
The really cool mug that
Director
Doug Lloyd, who's a potter, made for me.
Actually he made one for all the company
members. He also gave us each a rose.
I have received the info packet for my
guided improv,
U.D. Law School, mock
trial gig coming up in early February. Got it last evening from
U.D. Law actors' coordinator, Fran Pesch. I've only given it a
cursory look-over, but it is a practice case that is new to me. I
will be playing two roles, which is common. I'll be pulling out the
3x5 index cards shortly to start making my flash cards for fact &
info memorization.
A small emergency-lite has occurred. There's been an injury that
puts the production in need of more hands to help during the run.
The injury is nothing terribly serious, just enough to hinder one
crew member slightly incapacitated.
It appears that a solution has been arrived at and new hands will
be available for the last two weekends. So we have quelled the
production gremlin's
entertainment.
PLAYWRIGHT WORK ‐‐
THE QUESTION OF THE PLAYSCRIPT OVERHAUL:
As established in the not-too-distant past, I have decided to do
some rewriting
on my two-act.
How much revamping will be involved I am not sure about, yet. I
will significantly move passages around in the manuscript,
and I certainly have a goal to further
kill many of my little darlings.
I'm also feeling a slight urge to overhaul my approach to telling
the story but am conflicted about it. The method I am using is a
challenge to do well; there are a lot of pitfalls it's easy to
stumble into; I have, in fact, stumbled into some of them in the
current and past drafts of the play. A big part of me wants to keep
my current approach, my current method, and overcome the pitfalls
to tell the story the way I am and make it interesting and compelling.
One thing I will have to concede to is that no matter how successful
I ultimately feel I am with the current approach, there will be
audience members and readers who will not like it specifically
because they are opposed to the method ‐‐ because they
have been taught that the method I am employing goes against a core,
principal convention they believe is carved into a titanium wall of
playwriting rules.
ANOTHER GREAT WEEKEND!:
Our second weekend has wrapped
and was as successful as our first. I was not in attendance but the
reports have all been good, and I have been privy to some audience
responses.
Big kudos and major thanks to Ms. Lyrit Ertsgaard, who joined the
stage crew
and took over many of the crew duties that belonged to our injured
crew member.
THREE MORE SHOWS! NEXT WEEKEND!
DTG'S 24/25 DIRECTORS:
I'm happy to report that next season I again get to helm a play at
The Guild. Mine is
the second production of the season, Campaigns Inc., a dark
political comedy by native Daytonian
Will Alan,
a professional actor and playwright, once residing in Chicago (as
a resident artist at the famed
Steppenwolf Theatre), and
now centered in L.A. (and a company member at
Timeline Theatre Company).
My show is a season extra, and will not be a part of the season
ticket package, but season subscribers will be able to purchased
a ticket for Campaigns Inc. as an add-on at a discount from
the single-ticket purchase price.
I have already begun to corral my production crew, or attempt to.
I have two firm "yeses," one "probably," one
query out there as of yet not responded to, and a few queries I
haven't yet made but am about to make.
The show will run two weekends, Oct 11‐20, 2024.
General auditions are currently scheduled for Aug 26 & 27, 2024.
Here is the official DTG announcement about all six directors:
Dayton Theatre Guild Is Excited to Announce the Directors for Our
2024/2025 Season:
1) The Enchanted Cottage
by Sir Arthur Wing Pinero
Directed by Ray Gambrel
Showing Aug 23‐Sep 8, 2024
(Auditions: Jul 8 & 9, 2024)
========
*** Season Extra *** Campaigns, Inc.
a new play by native Daytonian Will Allan
Directed by K.L.Storer
Showing Oct 11‐20, 2024
(Auditions: Aug 26 & 27, 2024)
*Campaigns, Inc. is a season extra and not in the subscription package.
========
2) The Woman in Black
Adapted by Stephen Mallatratt, by Susan Hill
Directed by David Shough
Showing Nov 29‐Dec 15, 2024
(Auditions: Oct 14 & 15, 2024)
========
3) The Minutes
by Tracy Letts
Directed by Melissa Ertsgaard
Showing Jan 31‐Feb 16, 2025
(Auditions: Dec 2 & 3, 2024)
========
4) Chancers
by Robert Massey
Directed by Marjorie Strader
Showing Mar 28‐Apr 13, 2025
(Auditions: Feb 3 & 4, 2025)
========
5) Between Riverside and Crazy
by Stephen Adly Guirgis
Directed by Robert-Wayne Waldron
Showing May 23‐Jun 8, 2025
(Auditions: Mar 31 & Apr 1, 2025)
*Note that all audition dates may be subject to change
Work has officially begun on my study flash cards of facts/information
about the case for the
guided improv
gig for the U.D. Law School
mock trial I booked for the first Saturday in February. I am nowhere
near finished yet, but should be before the weekend is over, and
likely will have them all finished and will be doing drills tomorrow.
The flash cards, created on 3x5 index cards, are, as you five regulars
probably know, a staple of my actor's memorization technique; they're
most handy for these U.D. Law gigs to get the parameter of information
my characters* need to know embedded in my thick skull ‐‐
*often for these gigs I play two characters for the case, one
prosecution witness and one defense witness. The flash cards are
also a standard technique for me to drill my lines for scripted gigs.
One of the things that is always interesting about playing these
witnesses in these exercises is that there is always at least one
glaring, built-in flaw in the character's deposition ‐‐
where most of the information for the actor comes from ‐‐
as well as in the supporting documentation, usually mock exhibits
for the courtroom (photos of evidence, the scene, reports, etc.).
As the character you have to ignore any discrepancies, inconstancies,
and poor leaps of logic from your information. But, that happens with
most characters worth playing in a scripted production, too. You, the
actor, have to be your character's advocate and see and feel things
with their opinion and point of view, regardless of what you see
from your off-stage, or off-screen, position in the real world.
It's always fun to see if the law students on the opposing counsel
have picked up on the problem(s) and if so, how well they use such
to their advantage; spoiler alert: they don't always capitalize well,
and sometimes they don't seem to even catch the problem(s).
Conversely, it's interesting to see how the team using the witness
deals with the problem(s). If they're smart, they'll do what they
can to play it down or make it irrelevent; and, sometimes it seems
they don't catch the issue(s), either.
Lunchtime on Tuesday at
the rent-payer,
starting my flashcards to memorize the info for the
gig.
Wednesday evening, at home, working further on the
flashcards.
Last night, at home again, continuing on the
flashcards creation.
ANOTHER ACTING GIG?:
A little vague-posting, here: I've also begun to do some
actor's prep for another actor's gig I hope to land sometime soon.
Some of the preparation has been going on for quite a while and some
of it has just begun here recently. Recently for instance, I've
started script study,
with a copy of said script I have come into possession of, which
includes some
character analysis
as well as the practical action of speaking the character's lines
out loud. I've also been doing what I will ambiguously refer to as
dramaturgy
of a sort. All of this is on-going.
AND MORE PREP WEARING A DIFFERENT HAT:
Meanwhile, though it's months off, as I stated in the last blog post
I'm already in the early phase of
preproduction
for the October mounting of Campaigns Inc., by
Will Alan,
with me as director.
I have a pretty decent headstart on putting together the
production team.
Six production staff positions are confirmed; there are another
four I'm waiting for a response on; and there are probably one or
two, or more, run crew
positions that we will need to fill. There's also some
Powerpoint
production elements that I need to get a start on. I am not familiar
with Powerpoint, whatsoever, so I need to get well acquainted with
it now rather than later. I also need to familiarize myself with
vintage
aspect ratios
in Final Cut Pro X
as Campaigns Inc. needs the production gag of a 1930s
movie to be shown during the performance. Honestly, it could be
possible to have actors act out on stage the contents of the
movie within the play, but that would not be as effective and it
would make for a rather awkward presentation. The movie needs to
be shot, then played during the stage performances.
SOMEWHERE ON THE HORIZON:
Like I've mentioned in earlier blog posts, there are a couple
pieces of
production music
that I wrote and recorded for
Wednesday's Child
that I want to develop and extend into full-blown works. Some ideas
on how to expand both pieces (it's two at the moment) have been
bouncing around in my head.
There have also been some other song ideas introducing themselves
to my brain, both some musical ideas and some lyrical ideas. I can't
say when any of this will be acted upon but the germination has
definitely started. Then there are the past projects that are in
various stages of
mixing and
mastering.
I'LL GO, IF I DON'T HAVE TO TALK:
Wednesday I took advantage of the presale for
Dayton Live
patrons for a ticket to see
Jerry Seinfeld
in April. I got a decent seat, too: Orchestra Row A, seat 108,
seven rows back from the stage. There were actually closer seats
open but at the time of purchase, and for anytime in the immediate
future, they were/are beyond my current budgetary restrictions.
In fact, the ticket I bought was a little bit more than I should have
spent, yet.....I spent it.
Seven rows back, almost center, isn't exactly a bad
seat. Had my credit card balance been a little better
I would be in the second row.
This Pulitzer Prize finalist and Tony-nominated play examines
the relationship between two estranged brothers. It is set
in the kitchen of their mother's home in the desert, 40 miles
east of Los Angeles. Austin, a screenwriter and achiever,
is working on a script he has sold to producer Saul Kimmer.
Lee is a demented petty thief who drops in and pitches his
own idea for a movie to the producer. Sal then wants Austin
to junk his bleak, modern love story and write Lee's trashy
Western tale.
The Cast of TRUE WEST
(in order of appearance/speaking)
Work creating the 3x5 flashcards to drill myself on the info for
my U.D. Law School
mock trial gig is not completed. A couple issues come into play.
One is that time has been rather tight over the last week or so.
The bigger issue is that there is a particular forensic science
issue in the deposition of one the characters I am playing that is
rather dense and has quite a few moving parts. And the details
are scattered in the deposition in a less-than-organized manner.
I spent a good amount of my time last evening creating a text
document on my computer just to rearrange the points of fact about
this forensic aspect so I could wrangle them into an order that
will be easier for me to, one, make better sense of it all, and two,
to better memorize it all. Time is getting tight, the gig is this
coming Saturday, but I'm not in a panic as of yet.
Meanwhile, the Lawnchair cast list has been officially
announced:
CHARACTER
ACTOR
Jerry Gorman
Aaron Hill
Gracie
Jeannine Parson
Big Jack Preston
Drew Roby
Blaire
Emma Alexander
Mother Gorman
Rhea Smith
Mr. Frankel
Isaac Bement
French Boy/Amelia Earhart
Julia DiPaolo
NASA Official/Leonardo DaVinci
Michael Plaugher
TV Reporter/Charles Lindbergh
Jamie McQuinn
FAA Agent
Jamie Pavlofsky
Once again there are mostly faces new to the Guild stage, which is
always an exciting thing!
Honestly I've not begun any soundwork on this show. But I do
now have a hardcopy of the script to troll for what I am sure will
be a minumum of sound cues.
This being a musical, there also won't be any prerecorded
production music;
that will all be live, from the band. I will need to provide
pre-show music,
and Kim and I briefly discussed along what lines the theme
of curating the music might fall. The important task will be dealing
with the situations where we need wireless mics. Overall, the cast
won't have mics ‐‐ when we do musicals, or live music in
straight shows,
in our space we usually don't mic the cast because of the intimacy
of the space. But there will be some moments in this show that
need mics for specific actors. We have our hand-held wireless mics,
but we will need one wireless
Lavalier mic,
and I am about to research if I can borrow or rent one and assign
it to a channel on the transceiver for our hand-helds. It will be
much easier of I can.
Meanwhile again, I'm waiting for word on whether we have clearance
to use maybe, dialogue, but certainly, music from the show in the
promo trailer. Kim and I have even had another initial discussion
about what song should be used. I haven't even listened to the
cast album, so I'm not yet familiar with the show's songs.
ONE SMALLISH STEP:
Just a smidgeon more
preproduction
has happened for my next gig as a
director,
next October's Campaigns Inc., by
Will Alan.
I'm gonna once again do a little vague-posting by not revealing
what that was ‐‐ it's none of the things I mentioned in
the last blog post, but it is a good thing that will be revealed at
a much later date.
POST-MORTEM LITE:
I'm not going to attack you with an obnoxiously-long, overly-verbose
ramble, like I did with the
Wednesday's Child post-mortem,
but I did want to add a coda that this was another stellar production.
Thus far our 2023/2024 Guild
season has been excellent ‐‐ even if I am more than a
little bias, especially about the sophomore production. These cast
member's performances were excellent. Red's
scenic design
was great. Becky Howard's properties
work was dead on target. Marjorie Strader's
lighting design
was, once again, perfect for the script. Carol Finley's
costuming
was her usual marvelous work. Kayla Graham orchestrated
some perfect fight choreography.
The production crew was top-notch: Melissa Ertsgaard
(production stage manager),
Abby Williams & Lyrit Ertsgaard:
(run crew),
Rhea Smith (lighting tech),
and Sarah Saunders (sound tech).
I received a few kudos for my
soundwork,
too. And, of course, all this was done under the fine stewardship
of our
director,
Doug Lloyd.
A couple specific shout-outs: Lyrit Ertsgaard came in for the second
and third weeks of the run after Mom (Melissa, our PSM) broke her
foot, which left Mom mostly imobile and very unable to perform most
of her duties as stage manager. Lyrit came in, did a bang-up job,
and saved the production's bacon. Also, Lynn Vanderpool came in and
gave a tutorial to cast member Philip Trickey on how to use body
makeup to cover some tattoos that were out-of-character for his
work as movie producer Saul.
The audiences certainly liked it. One hard-core theatre person
confided that this was the third time they've seen the show, the
other two productions being
professional productions,
and this was the first time they've liked the show. They thanked
our production for showing them what the script can be when done
right ‐‐ that's only a minor rewording of what they said.
Last night I finished the 3x5 flashcards for my
U.D. Law School.mock
trial gig coming up this weekend. Return readers may know that I'll
be portraying two witnesses, one for the prosecution, one for the
defense. This is a standard practice in these U.D. Law,
guided improv
gigs, for each actor to play two characters, one for each side of
the argument. It's also standard for one of the two characters to
be giving testimony to dispute the specific testimony of the other
character that actor is playing. This is the case with me, here.
As I wrote on Jan 26
in respect to the first character whose info I was putting
on the flash cards, the second one, whose flashcards I finished
last night, has some major problems with the character's testimony.
My instincts argue for me to alter the logical flaws, but those
flaws, as I wrote before, are purposefully built in as part of the
exercise for the law students. So I'm duty bound to deliver the
bad testimony with confidence and gusto, despite the actor, K.L.,
realizing how dubious the points in question are. And again, it's
interesting to see if the students on either side of the case
catch these issues and if so, what they do with them.
Well, now that I have the flashcards completed, I'll spend much, close
to most, of my "free" time between now and Saturday morning
drilling myself with the flashcards and delving back, directly into
the source material.
Finishing up those 3x5 flashcards last night
‐‐ now onto the drills.
I'M NOT REALLY A DACTYLOGRAM* EXPERT, I JUST PLAY ONE FOR LAW
STUDENTS:
So, as I promised, a considerable amount of my so-called
"free time" over the last few days has been spent getting
the facts and info into my brain for my two witnesses for today's
U.D. Law School mock trial
gig, which I'll be leaving for shortly after I upload this blog
post.
Yesterday I took a
vacation
day from the rent-payer
to spend much of the day reading and re-reading, and studying and
re-studying the gig packet; and, of course, I spent a lot of time
working with my flashcards, drilling myself on the facts, info, and
positions of my two characters. Though I will admit that I also took
a nap for a couple hours in the early afternoon. I also did a
free-weights workout after my nap, but study on the case in between
sets. So, the In the Gym graphic is only partially accurate.
I also was in my TV-free zone for the last several days; but I did
listen to a lot of Bartók, Schubert, Teleman, and Vivaldi.
I always go into these gigs feeling like I'm unprepared, but rarely
have I ever been caught off-guard during the examinations or the
cross-examinations. The big issue is that there is always far more
information to memorize than will be asked about by any of the student
lawyers. But, I have to know it all, and sometimes I go in feeling
pretty shaky about some info.
But, I have crammed into my head whatever I have crammed into my
head, and it's time to go be a couple witnesses.
*Dactylogram: finger print
WILL I GET MY TAXES FILED EARLY THIS YEAR? OR WILL IT
BE THE SAME OL', SAME OL'?:
I believe I have all the documents now to do my 2023 taxes.
I have the perfect opportunity this weekend after the U.D.
Law School gig is
wrapped.
Getting whatever refund I'll get ‐‐ *remember
that the Trump/GOP tax increase on the middle and lower
income households will kick in this year (and the GOP and
their wacko leader will insinuate that it's the current
White House's doing) ‐‐ but getting my refund
sooner rather than later would be a good thing.
So this weekend is a good time to sit down and file my
taxes, federal and state.
Yes, I write something similar to this every year, and
with only a few rare exceptions I have still filed on or
close to the April deadline most years. Lets see of I can
change that this year.
But, seriously, from this afternoon, onward, the
weekend is wide open, and, like most of you out there, the
whole process of doing my taxes will take a couple hours at
the most.
THOUGH I WAS A DACTYLOGRAM EXPERT, I WASN'T A COP
‐‐ AND OTHER ADVENTURES:
So, there were a couple monkey wrenches in the machinery Saturday
for the
U.D. Law School mock trial
gig. First, despite mention of the 10:00 start time in several emails
I'd received, I still had it in my mind that the gig started at
9:00. I wanted to be there early to get some last-minute study in,
as well as the possible chance to confer with the student lawyers
for some trial prep, so I got there at about 8:15; I was a little
earlier than I needed to be.
Another monkey wrench was that due to illness, one of the teams
could not be there, so each of us actors only played one of the
two characters we were assigned. I and another actor were both
assigned to play a police detective for the prosecution
and a forensic fingerprint (dactylogram) expert for the
defense. One would play the cop for one team then switch to the
other team to play the expert -- so the teams didn't have the same
actor playing both roles. With the team dropping out we each only
played one; I played the expert, the other actor played the detective.
This was same for the other two actors who were both playing their
own set of two witnesses. Bottom line, we all ended up spending a
lot of time learning the facts and info for a character we didn't
end up portraying. Kind of a drag, but not the worst thing that has
ever happened. However, I will note that the amount of the
police detective's info I was charged to know was a big reason I
burned eight hours of
vacation
from the rent-payer
to take the day off Friday to top off my study for the gig.
And then.......there were revisions made to the case files and the
details of all the characters. These were revisions we actors were
not made aware of. So we all ended up getting questions we were not
prepared for because it was information we didn't know. That was
a serious SNAFU. Again, not a disaster, but it was a little
frustrating.
Now I'm moving into what I call full-tilt-boogie on the
sound design
for the show. I have trolled the script for the scripted
sound cues
as well as other potential ones. There aren't too terribly many
specified in the script, and
Director
Kim Warrick may not want all of them ‐‐ often the
director doesn't. More importantly, I've started delving into
potential mic needs for the show. I met last night with Kim to
begin discussion on both the sound cue needs and sound hardware
needs. At this points it's: wait and see how the
staging
plays out, for many of these points.
The production has also called upon my unofficial position at
The Guild as the
virtually, approximate,
PSEUDO-technical director
for the theatre. By default I am the most qualified;
"most" is definitely a relative term; I am truly not anywhere
close to well-qualified. There is a lot of knowledge and skill
a good technical director ought to have that, believe me, I
do not possess.
However, the tasks I am being called upon here I can handle. The
orchestra will need monitor speakers to better hear the on-stage
singers; that is the easy one. We also need to set up a screen monitor
at the back of the house, with a camera on the conductor, with a
signal that feeds to the screen. That so the cast, performing on
stage, can look to the back of the house and see certain visual
conductor's cues. Investigation into setting that up is underway.
I am waiting for word from the
playwright,
Peter Ullian,
and the
composer/lyricist,
Robert Lindsey-Nassif,
about using a brief portion of the script/score in the
trailer.
If I get clearance, I may use some dialogue and
definitely will use a portion of one song. That song has been
determined based on Kim's recommendation.
Lunchtime, yesterday, at
the rent-payer,
probing the Lawnchair Man script for
sound cues.
I was in the theatre Saturday and yesterday running a daisy-chain
of sound cable, for the monitors, from the booth to the area where
the orchestra pit
will be, and did a lot of related work. I experimented with the monitor
speakers. I ran in to two problems, but I believe I have solutions for both.
The first problem was one I've faced before for other shows, that
being that there is a too-noticeable ground hum that comes from the
speakers when they are plugged into certain wall sockets. I did
various things to isolate the offender and found the issue and a
solution.
The second problem is that in our theatre space, regardless of the
ground hum buzz, it's clear there is no way to use open monitor
speakers for the conductor and band to hear the onstage voices.
There's a feedback loop that fires-up before the monitor speakers
are close to loud enough to be of use. After a bit of experimentation
I found that the feedback just cannot be avoided from open speakers.
The solution is to put the conductor and musicians into headphones.
I'd been looking at
patch bays
to accommodate the multiple phones needed, but as it turns out I
need a
headphone amplifier
with multiple outputs.
As of yet, I've not started the work on the sound cues for the
sound design,
but that starts tonight. I'll start pulling the cues together from
my sound library,
or procruing new ones, though I don't believe the latter will be
necessary.
Later this week I'll be recording one
voice-over
with an actor. I'll create another one, artificially, myself, using
the text-reader voice feature on my
MacBook Pro.
I'll also begin curating the
preshow music;
it's going to be an oddly eclectic list of music, all based on the
theme of flying: go figure.
Me, hooking up one of the monitor speakers
in the area designated for the pit.
Me, doing some on-line shopping research,
erroneously for a patch bay.
NEVER TOO EARLY....:
CAMPAIGNS, INC.
by Will Alan
A little bit more very early
preproduction
has happened. Another production staff member has officially
come on board. I've come up with some ‐‐ underscore:
some ‐‐ of the production gameplan and
communicated such with the staff.
DANGED RABBIT HOLE!:
Months back I got an idea for something for the
story bible
timeline of the unverse of the protagonist and his family, friends,
colleagues, and acquaintences that my novel manuscript and my play
manuscript center around. Periodically I've added little events
for this idea over the course of several decades in the timeline.
I've written here in the past how gothic this story bible has
become, and how it continues to grow.
Sometimes while adding an entry I'll actually add a passage of
dialogue, or perhaps a correspondence or portion of a news report.
As of late, rather than add the dialogue directly into the timeline
entry, I have used the Final Draft
software to write a short-short play as a separate document, then
refer to it in the entry. Over the last week or so, I've spent
some time on that for a particular entry regarding this idea I've
been infusing into the bible.
Once again, as I was working on the scripted entry, I again went
into that rabbit hole, I sometimes do, and allowed this venture to
take precidence over other projects, mostly theatre projects. But
I came to a place with the little excercise where it shaped itself
into a pretty structured
ten-minute play.
There's a Ten-minute Play festival coming up this summer, and I
may just submit this to it.....perhaps.....We'll see.
Work has started on the
sound cues
for the show. I recorded and mixed the two
voice-overs
the show needs. One is an electronic voice, which I got by using the
text-reader voice on my
MacBook Pro,
last week; the other is the voice of the show's protagonist, Jerry
(Aaron Hill), which I recorded and processed the next day. I've also
harvested some of the other
SFX
the show needs. I believe I have all the
preshow music
and I'm in the process of
normalizing
the volumes levels on those recordings.
The 4-channel
headphone amplifier
is ordered and should be in my possession by the end of the week.
For those who don't know, the headphone amp is so that the three
musicians and the conductor, all in the
orchestra pit
can use headphones to hear the cast singing on our
thrust stage.
Last week I met with Greg Torre, from
Miami Valley Communications Council,
who came in to look the palce over in order for MVCC to help us out
by providing a camera and monitor screen so that, from the thrust,
the cast can see our conductor, Sarah Lingg, conducting the music.
There are certain cues from her the cast needs to be able to see as
they perform. Theatres that frequently do
musicals
usually have such a setup as part of their standard equipment. We
rarely do musicals, and the last several we've done did not require
such. This one does. A
BIG
THANKS to Greg and to Ray Gambrell, also from MVCC ‐‐
Ray is also directing our first show, next season,
The Enchanted Cottage.
Greg will be in soon to install the equipment MVCC is loaning us.
STILL NOT TOO EARLY:
CAMPAIGNS, INC.
by Will Alan
Though I won't need it for more than a half-year from now, I have
secured from
Will Alan
the copyright clearance to use dialogue from the Campaigns, Inc.
script in the
promotional trailer
that will be published a few days before our October 11
Opening Night.
His permission didn't really come as a surprise to me.
Despite that I have a few other things on my current plate, I still
need to up my
preproduction
for this. There is some
dramaturgy
I ought to attend to soon. There's some specific
preproduction,
which includes some of that dramaturgy, that I need to get a
start on for the
principal photography
of a short movie that needs produced for use within the
performances of the play. Part of that is the early casting of a
couple of the characters (more on that later) for the
shoot,
that which will take place in the late summer. There's also a
period prop
that either has to be found or built for the shoot.
As I wrote in an earlier post, there are a few technical things I
need to get on. For one, I need to learn
Powerpoint
because that will be needed for the production ‐‐ to
show that movie and most likely for another element at the end of
the performances. And I need to learn how to produce a 4:3
aspect ratio
in Final Cut Pro X.
I'll likely be shooting in 16:9, but I need the
locked edit
to be 4:3 without compressing the image. It's supposed to be a
1930s movie, so it'll be in 4:3 and also in black-and-white. It
will not, however, be silent. There will be audio, but that audio
will be
sweetened
to have a tinselly sound.
YOU DON'T JUST REHEARSE WHAT YOU'VE BOOKED:
An actor colleague and I recently got together to read with each
other in prep for an audition we both will be going for. We've
met once and plan to meet at least once more, if not more than
that. I also have a few word pronunciations to practice for the
role I'm going after.
PLAYWRIGHT WORK ‐‐
FROM STORY-BIBLE ENTRY TO SHORT PLAY TO POSSIBLE FULL-LENGTH PLAY:
So that recent
story-bible
rabbit-hole I wrote of going down manifested into a
ten-minute play,
or almost a ten-minute play.
To elaborate, I have begun the practice of creating separate documents
consisting of pieces of dialogue for some entries into the timeline
documents in my story bible materials for the universe of the
characters for my already completed draft of a
full-length play,
and for my earlier novel. In the past I'd simply added the dialogue
into the timeline entry, as shown on the screenshot to the left.
What I've been doing recently is using the
Final Draft software to
lay out the dialogue in play script format in a separate document,
saving that script document in a specific folder and then referring
to it in the entry in the timeline. I've done with two pieces of
dialogue here recently and I plan to go back and move the past
dialogues in the timeline, as there are a few, into these
play-script-formatted documents, including the entry shown on the
left.
The first of the two that I've done the play-script format for is
very much a vignette, not quite fully formed into a story structure.
This second one, the real subject of this post entry was closer to
fully formed. I recognized that and took it all the way. The result
is the fully-developed draft of a short, one-scene play. I wrote
above that it is " almost a ten-minute play";
that's because it's running a little longer, coming in at about
fifteen minutes. There actually is a ten-minute play festival
coming up this summer, put on by the
Yellow Springs Theatre Company,
and I considered submitting this short play, but I verified that
the play must come in at ten minutes or less, the deadline for
submission was Friday, March 1, and I did not have time to sit
down and trim five minutes off in time to make that deadline. I'm
not actually sure I want to cut five minutes, anyway.
For this work in question, I'd contacted a couple lawyers I know to
ask for their opinion on an aspect of the entry, when it was just
an entry for possible later use. Both told me pretty much the same
thing. I sent the fully-formed short play to one, who also happens
to be one of my area's finest actors, and he gave me some feedback
from both his legal and theatrical experiences. There is some
chance this little fifteen-minute could be expanded, based on my
own urges toward it and buoyed further by his feedback. If so, it
will be a while. I still have the
rewrite
of the full-length from this same universe, which is higher priority.
MY WARRIOR-MUSE QUEEN JUST WILL NOT STOP WHISPERING IN MY EAR:
Ideas for new songs, all of music, lyrics, arrangements, and
production, keep coming to me. I'm not seeing a window coming up
that has a lot of space for a lot of attention to new music. What
I may end up doing is some piecemeal work on new music. As I've
written in earlier blog post, there is some original
scene-change music
I composed for
Wednesday's Child
that I want to expand upon and make full-blown works out of. There
are other ideas that are coming to me, too. But don't expect to
read about a new album release for quite a while.
THIS IS NOT "HOTEL CALIFORNIA":
This past weekend I saw I nice production of
No Exit,
by Jean-Paul Sartre
(adapted by Paul Bowles)
at X*ACT: Xenia Area Community Theater.
Hats off to Director Mike Taint, and his cast ‐‐ Matt
Lindsay, Melissa Young, Trenton Napier, and Sarah Bortz ‐‐
plus Tech Director Shannon Michalak.
There are three shows left this coming weekend. It's a, er, um, a
"fun" show.....really.......Fun. But really, a good night
(or afternoon) of theatre.
NOT EXACTLY A WINDFALL, BUT "$" ALL
THE SAME:
Well, I did get my 2023 taxes done early, but it took
a few weeks from when I'd gather all the relevant documents
together and posed the question of how soon I'd get it done
‐‐ almost exactly a month.
But both the federal and the state are done and I should be
able to throw some money toward cooling down my obscenely
hot credit card debt within several weeks. Because, yes, you
can count on that being where the refunds, or at least the
majority of them, will go. Not that it'll put a great big
dent in the debt, but it will be of some assistance. I'd
love to use it toward a nice
vacation
this summer, but I really need to work on that credit card
debt.
At least this year I didn't procrastinate until the
eleventh hour as I have in many years past.
I voted this morning, shortly after the polls opened. There were no
lines, no waiting. Honestly, I kind of wish there already had been
some lines and some waiting, despite that I live in a community
with a majority of folk who will be voting in the other party’s
primary.
MORE LAWN WORK ‐‐ AUDIO STUFF, THE PROMO TRAILER,
TV MONITORING, AND THAT |)A/\/\|\|E|)
:
Yes, it's been a while since I posted much material here. I have
not been idle, I just haven't had anything prose in shape to publish,
nor have I allowed a lot of time to get anything there. I have
been working on this entry all along, just not getting any portions
to completion until now. In the meantime
Lawnchair Man
is now finishing its
Tech Week,
with Final Dress
tonight and
Opening Night
tomorrow. Here's my Lawnchair journey since last I uploaded
any words about it...:
I took three full
vacation
days, from the rent-payer,
the first two on Friday, Mar 8, and Monday, Mar 11, plus a few hours
Tuesday morning, the 12th, to work at
the theatre on the
show. I had plenty to work on. Of course, I had
sound design
stuff to do, but there was also some of that
uber-pseudo-technical director
stuff to work on, as well; and there was other work to do.
Monday, Mar 11, at the start of the production's
sitzprobe
evening, I recorded the designated song from the score for use in
the promotional trailer,
which I shot the footage for this last Tuesday night at the first
full dress rehearsal.
Friday afternoon, on the 8th, I initially set up my audio recording
equipment. I brought my Tascam 24-Track recorder,
my three mics, which includes my one
Shure SM7B vocal mic.
I also brought my two working mic stands, and my two
XLR sound
cords. But I wanted to record at least five channels, with three mics
on the cast and two on the band. That's not completely ideal, as I
would have really loved to have had more mics on both aspects as
well as recording the music in a more acoustically friendly
environment, such as a recording studio setting.
I needed two more mics, fortunately the Guild has two nice wireless
handheld mics and just happens to have the three extra XLR cords I
needed, so I employed those as well. So I was able to put three mics
on the cast ensemble and two on the four-piece band. I did have to
head down the road to Sound Force
to pick up three more mic stands. I'm not sure yet if I'm going to
keep all three or get a reimbursement for two from the theatre and
put them in the DTG inventory.
I mixed and
mastered
the song this past Sunday. Despite the challenging acoustics in the
theatre's mainstage
area, I was able to get a pretty decent final master. I even got
a relatively nice stereo mix, considering that all five channel tracks
each have a certain amount of bleed from all the other four.
Ultimately I was able to get a final mix that is much cleaner than
what I expected; I expected to have something far muddier. Not that
the final is the clearest, crispest sound there can be, but it ain't
at all bad.
This Tuesday night was the first official
dress rehearsal,
with the cast in their costumes. That was my night for
principal photography
for the trailer. This time, rather than having any cast members
perform moments directly and specifically for the camera, I simply
shot the rehearsal, or a good portion of it. There will be no
dialogue in the DV movie, only
mos
footage accompanied by my audio recording of the cast. Okay, technically
there is dialogue, but it wasn't recorded that night.
Yesterday I took that third
vacation
day to edit the DV movie to
final cut,
inFinal Cut Pro X,
and though it's not exactly a threat to the legacy of Federico
Fellini, it'll do.
My other big push over that first weekend was to finalize all the
sound cues,
which for the show itself are all
sound effects,
(no production music
for this one), for the obvious reason. That same Sunday, I
programmed the soundwork
into Show Cue Systems.
I've also completely curated the
preshow music,
being all songs that somehow or another touch on the theme of flying,
again, for another obvious reason.
Greg Torre, from Miami Valley Communications Council
has made a few trips to install the MVCC camera and monitor screen
so the cast can see the conductor's cues while on stage. After a few
little glitches we have a camera monitoring system that more than
does the job. Many, many thanks to Greg, Ray Gambrell, and MVCC.
Again, this is something I am helping the production with in my
super-unofficial capacity as the theatre's defacto
faux-technical director,
which, as I have written in this blog before, I am seriously under
qualified for ‐‐ well maybe not with the "faux"
prefix attached, but definitely when that prefix is removed.
On another note related to this show and this "faux-technical
director" nonsense, the 4-channel
headphone amplifier
I ordered came in. The order was initiated by my assessment
that it was needed in the
orchestra pit,
back stage, so the musicians and conductor could hear the
cast singing on the thrust stage. However, the production
team has come to the conclusion that an audio monitoring
system in the pit will not be necessary. Unfortunately I did
not know that until after the order was fulfilled. Fortunately,
I had decided to buy the headphone amplifier for myself
rather than for the theatre.
Well......during this period that I write of, we have had some
annoying mischief from that damned
gremlin during the
lead-up to, then during, Tech Week. The first issue happened over
the weekend of March 9 when the little bastard sabotaged the external
7.1 sound card for the sound-op computer. Two channels on the card
are now toasted, so for the moment, and in practicality for this
production, we will only have two PA speakers in the house receiving
signals, rather than all four. I re-networked the channels so the
two speakers with sound will be the ones
up stage
of the thrust
(i.e.: front of house), as opposed to the two that are in the two
down stage
corners of the house, the back of the house.
But the sound-snafu issues didn't stop there! This Monday
evening, after the
tech run
had started, the sound-op laptop began an automatic update of its
Windows® OS. Seems that somehow the wi-fi was turned on ‐‐
which it is NOT supposed to be!
‐‐ so the laptop was rendered incapacitated during a good
chunk of the rehearsal. Fortunately, I had myMacBook there
with the original SFX files for the show, so we were able to run
a sound plug from mine into the mixing board and play the remaining
cues for the show while the update on the theatre laptop was
trudging along.
But wait, there's more....: After the update was finished,
the Show Cue System software could not find the driver for the external
sound card, and it would not let me get to the place in the software
where I could change it to the laptop's internal sound card driver.
I had to create a new SCS program file of the show after the Monday
night rehearsal was finished. I'm lucky there are not a lot of sound
cues in the show, so I was still able to get hme by 11:00. I did have
to come in early the next day to reset the volume level for each cue.
It could have been worse, and it's a good thing that I'll be getting
a new external sound card for our sound system. My hope is that we
will be up and running with a new soundcard before
Superior Donuts
opens.
There were also a few different issues with the camera/monitor screen
system to show the conductor to the cast while they are on stage.
There have been a few cable connection issues, one which the little
gremlin jerk laid
on us this Monday as the run was just about to start. But Greg from
MVCC was more than happy to come down and trouble shoot the problem.
He found it and we now know what to do if it happens again, and even
ways, we hope, to help prevent it from occurring.
So here is an over-abundant array of pics from the last two weeks:
The initial set up, Friday, Mar 8, for audio recording
during the sitzprobe ‐‐ setting up to run
some preliminary mic checks, etcetera.
Still the recording equipment set-up.
Pizza dinner break, Friday the 8th.
Installing a shelf for the back-stage monitor
camera, still that Friday.
Editing sound effects in the tech booth at the
theatre on Saturday, Mar 9.
One last harvest, on-line, for a sound effect.
Programming the sound cues for the show, Sunday,
Mar 10.
Checking audio (mics, levels, etc.) before the Mar
11 sitzprobe.
Pizza again before the sitzprobe.
The MVCC camera setting on the backstage
platform.
The MVCC monitor screen, mounted in the back
of the house.
Last Saturday was the show's
tech day.
It also happened to be St. Patrick's Day weekend,
and just a two-minute walk from the theatre the
serious annual St. Paddy's Day blowout in
The Oregon District
was up and running. So we had to chain off our
parking lot or else it would be full of St. Paddy's
partiers, and our cast and crew likely would not
have any parking. I was the gate keeper and took
the opportunity to work on my own creative stuff.
The script is a fictionalized account of the fictionalized account
that the real Louis de Rougemont gave to the world. Again,
the HRTC mounting was fun to watch. Bruce, by the way, had already
played de Rougemont, last summer, in a mounting of this script by
The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey.
I talked with him for a few minutes after the performance and he
talked of how nice it is to not have to start heading toward
off-book
from scratch, but merely needing to refresh oneself with the
text. It had been a while since I had seen Bruce on stage and it
was great to have another chance.
GAFFIGAN ON STAGE:
Originally, when I saw this gig was coming, I had decided not to
get a ticket, but I changed my mind. So, now, I'll be seeing
Mr. Gaffigan
for the fourth time. This time rather than a Dayton
venue, he'll be at the Taft Theatre
in Cincinnati.
I've seen a few acts there before; all have been musical acts. The
Gaffigan show will be the weekend after the closing of my next
Guild
directing effort, Campaigns Inc., by
Will Alan.
My seat for Jim ‐‐ Orchestra 3, Row G, Seat
7. Not a bad seat at all.
DECORUM OF THE PROS:
Here's a pet peeve I have about something that I experience, not
infrequently, on several different fronts. Maybe some of you do, too:
One sends an email or a text, asking a question, communicating an
important need, or giving some important information for the
collaborative project at hand. No response. After a reasonable period
of time, one reiterates the communication, possibly in a different
mode of communication. Still: no response.
Don't be that non-responder. It's not good professional etiquette.
It does not matter if a paycheck is involved or not; it is not
good professional etiquette in any circumstance where a team of
people are trying to work toward a common goal. It's frustrating
to the person who is trying to get or send information. Answer the
question or acknowledge that the message was received. Of course,
in the grand scheme of things, this is not a major misstep, but it's
still an annoyance.
Not doubt, I've been guilty of this, myself, but I try my damnedest
not to be.
Tech Week
is wrapped. I was among several who watched the
final dress
last night of this quirky, fun little
musical,
and we all enjoyed the evening. As
Director
Kim Warrick said to the cast during her final
notes,
all the cast really needs now is a full audience. The show runs
through April 7. If you live near or will be in the Dayton, Ohio area,
I recommend the show, if you want an entertaining evening of
silly, cheeky fun with some lovely, fun performances from a strong
cast. If you want Chekhov,
that's a different evening.
After taking a one-year hiatus for some retooling,
FutureFest,
Dayton's well-respected new play festival returns this
summer, and I am one of many who welcome it back!
Several weeks ago I was approached by the FutureFest 2024 committee
about designing sound
for the six finalist in this coming summer's weekend. I was interested
but only if I did not have to also be the weekend's
sound tech;
I really like sitting in the audience for FutureFest ‐‐
or being on stage in one of the plays. The committee is
amenable to my desire so I am on board as the FF24 sound designer.
This likely means that I won't be auditioning for any of the six
plays because attending the key rehearsals, of any play I was cast
in, close to and during
Tech Week
would be a problem since I will need to attend all six
tech rehearsals
as the sound designer, as well as some rehearsals of all six just
before Tech Week. I'm also basically precluded from submitting to
direct any of the plays, for basically the same reason.
Even though I was, as I usually am, the
Opening-Nighthouse manager,
I was, this time, able to attend to the performance far more than I
usually am under these circumstances. First, there was no intermission
to set up for, and second, I wore a pair of
The Guild's hearing
assistance headphones, to be sure the band was not overpowering the
singers when picked up by the hanging mics in the theatre that are
part of the hearing assistance sound system. So I heard the whole
show, and watched most of it on the lobby TV. So I can report with
good, first-hand authority that the Opening Night performance was
a strong start to the production's run! The cast, the musicians,
and the crew, all rocked it!
Including tonight's 8:00 show, you who are close enough to make it
to our theatre have eight more chances to come enjoy your evening
and laugh more than just a little.
This past Monday and Tuesday evening this actor auditioned for our
Dayton Theatre Guild
2023/2024 season closing production,
Superior Donuts,
by Tracy Letts.
I am thrilled to report that
director
Jared Mola offered me the
lead role
of Arthur Przybyszewski *(Shub-er-shef-ski), which is the
role this season I've had the most interested in; of course, I
accepted.
(updated Apr 26, 2024)
One role is not yet filled due to not having actors at
either audition night who met
type.
This is a circumstance where it would not work to
cast against type
because the text dictates that most characters are pretty specific
to one type or another ‐‐ there's not a lot of leeway in
most cases for this show. See some info below about the roles not
yet cast
Here is the current Superior Donuts cast list
*(as of April 26, 2024):
CHARACTER
ACTOR
Arthur Przybyszewski
K.L.Storer
Franco Wicks
Andre Tomlinson
Max Tarasov
Mike Beerbower
Officer Randy Osteen
Heather Martin
Officer James Bailey
Percy Vera
Luther Flynn
Maximillian Santucci
Lady Boyle
Jennifer Lockwood
Kevin Magee
Brandon Teeple
(updated Apr 26, 2024)
The following role has not yet been cast. For
more information or to make an audition appointment, contact
Director Jared Mola at
mola.jared@gmail.com
Kiril Ivakin
Male, 20s-30s. Russian. Max's nephew who appears at the end
of the play. A large man, he is described as looking like
Ivan Drago from Rocky IV. (Speaks with a Russian accent)
I got my call early Wednesday afternoon, so, Wednesday evening I
took out my large-print copy of the script ‐‐ which is
actually for my
soundwork
for this show ‐‐ and my 5x3 index cards, to start
creating my flashcards of cue lines against Arthur's lines, that to
begin my sojourn toward
off-book
status.
In terms of the audition, at least one other actor did a good read
as Arthur (in my estimation), so I certainly did not feel I
had a lock on the role. Being the classic egomaniac with an inferiority
complex, I was ready to get the email that goes out to all the
auditioners who did not get a part, and not get the phone call
offering the part. The result of that scenario being my ego shouting
its self-absorbed whine in my head about how I was "robbed."
One of my acting colleagues asked me, after seeing my
facebook post
(see the screenshot to the right), how I thought my audition went.
My answer was one that most actors who might read this will understand:
I felt good about it. And, my egomaniacal bias insists to
me that I was the only one who truly showed understanding
of the character, but that bastard has rose-colored glasses
and I can't relay on his judgement.
At least I've managed to get smart enough to be aware of how my
particular brand of megalomania deceives me. Of course, the voice
of self-doubt deceives me just as much. There have many times I
have been convinced I tanked an audition, that there was no way
I was going to be cast, only to get the call that I was in. Like I
told my fellow actor and friend about this one, though, I did feel
that I gave a good audition; and another of my friends and fellow
actor, who also auditioned for the show told me, "I thought you
were great...at auditions and I hope you have a lot of line memorization
ahead of you in the near future!" My egomania and my sense of
inferiority were at equal levels of anticipation and anxiety this
time around. A good decade or more ago, I was advised to wear my
anticipation about the result of auditions like a loose robe, to be
as nonchalant as I can. I've given that a shot with poor delivery
‐‐ maybe someday....
But, from my friends lips to the Theatre Godess's ears, because I
do "have a lot of line memorization ahead of [me]] in
the near future!" and, of course, that process has begun.
There's also one particular passage, and not at all a long one,
that will need particular attention. There's a litany of the names
of African-American poets that Arthur rattles off, and several of
those names will take practice for me to pronounce correctly. I
actually had already started working on this before auditions, in
the event that this part of the script would be part of one of the
audition sides.
It wasn't, and I haven't yet mastered the names to the point where
I can deliver the list as quickly as the script intimates it should
be done, but at least I fundamentally know how to pronounce these
few challenging names and my lips and tongue have begun getting
comfortable with the execution. Though, I would not have
delivered the list "at speed" during auditions.
The other thing that will be happening in this show is that I
and another actor will engage in some serious
stage combat,
which will be facilitated by the production's
fight choreographer,
fellow actor and fellow
Guild boardmember,
Kayla Graham (who also happens to be married to our director, Mr.
Mola). A little bit of basic fight choreography movement, for
those of us up for Arthur and the other relevant character, was
actually part of the audition. I'm guessing the choreography will
be relatively intricate and will take a bit of rehearsal, since
Letts'
description of the fight says, in part:
The fight is long. And painful. It is sweaty and bloody.
The fighters display great ferocity.
The fight involves fisticufts, grappling. wrestling and
found objects. The fight contains gouging, biting, kicking....
I am not, by-the-way, intimidated by this, but I know there is some
physical work coming up. Fortunately, with stage combat, and a good
fight choreographer, safety is built in, and though it's often a
bit of work, it is far less work and actually takes far less energy
‐‐ and force ‐‐ than the audience's
perception. And, of course, it's actually not violent, whatsoever.
That's if it's choreographed then executed correctly. I trust Kayla,
who is stage combat certified, and I trust the other actor. I am
feeling good about my upcoming collaboration with Kayla and my scene
mate. I'm also feeling like I am in good enough physical shape that
this will not be taxing on me.
Wednesday night, as I began the process of creating
my flashcards to do memory drills on my lines for
the show.
Continuing the process, the next day at lunch, in
the breakroom at
the rent-payer,
this time using the PDF of the script on my
laptop
as reference.