There were a lot of things I had planned to take out over this long break
from the rent-payer. There
are several excursions from 2019 that still need recounting: the trip to
New York City in May to see
To Kill a Mockingbird
on Broadway, as well as the Yiddish Fiddler on the Roof, and my stop
into The Met. There was
Paul McCartney in Lexington a
few weeks later, as well as some other cool things on that trip. There was
my annual attendance at FutureFest
at the Dayton Playhouse. And there was the
Indianapolis Zoo toward the
end of the summer. I also had plans to catch up on lots of TV. I still
have to finish season 3 of
Stranger Things and season
3 of Santa Clarita Diet.
And now there's all of season
3 of The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
that I want to watch; plus several other shows I've wanting to hook into.
Of course, I also had plans to get back to the play manuscript. A small
amount was done on the script, but not much. So, essentially, my plans for
the break did not pan out, because I got distracted.
If you've followed this silly blog recently you'll know that last week I
wrote and recorded a Christmas rock ballad,
"The Night Before the Night Before Christmas,"
and that I decided after it was originally posted that I needed to re-record
parts of it, to get the version linked in this paragraph. Being on a roll,
I have began another song, a rocker that at this point I have all, or most,
of the rhythm tracks recorded. I actually don't have lyrics yet, or even a
melody for said song. I had a couple initial ideas for words but I abandoned
them as the rhythm section took shape.
The rocker, with the working title of "New Short Rocker," initiated
something new for me as a bass player (which, of course, I am only now after
a few decades in hiatus). I bought a
capo, which
is that little bar that you may have seen affixed across the fret board on
the neck of a guitar. It changes the pitch of the open strings on the guitar.
By using it I was able to fret some bass chords up high on the neck to do
a really good job of impersonating a regular six-string rhythm guitar. I
recorded two separate chorded bass parts that way.
There's also a song I wrote back in the late 70s that I can use the capo on.
Back then I did something crazy; I tuned my D string up to an A, the A
just a step up from the G string. I am surprised the damned D string
didn't snap. With the capo I can get the same affect on the D string without
risking damage. I only put the capo across the E, A, and D string, but not
the G string (since I don't use the E and A strings in the song, those
having the capo on them doesn't matter). I tried it when I got home
from the music store the other day with the capo, and it works.
As for my "rhythm guitars" for the new rocker I'm working on, I
am absolutely happy with the results. Along with the actual, regular bass
line, the drum tracks, and the keyboards I've already laid down, I like
what I have. I can't say when the song will be done, though I would guess
it will be sooner rather than later. I'm also not sure that I will put this
one out there as readily. I may hold off. I may not be publishing the new
music so quickly on a regular basis. There are two new ones out there, right
now. That may be it for a little while. I may share the new music privately,
but not publicly, not until there's maybe a collection of, oh say, ten or
so.......
I'm still working on the third new song. As I wrote in the last post, I
have all, or most, of the rhythm backing done. Now I need to put in vocals,
and for that I need lyrics. Last night I finally started the lyrics, though
not much progress was made. I have already partially composed some of the
melody lines in my head, especially for the chorus section, I just don't
have many words, yet.
I also need to add the solo work and I have, again, composed some of it in
my head; now let's see if I can translate that to my fingers. But I do have
a strong direction for the solo work. Last night I did some production
experimenting to see if I can get the sort of effects on the solo work that
I want. I can, so that's good.
A new class series for the
Ohio Playwrights Circle
is in progress and I will be there as a reader. I have schedule myself for
all sessions through the last on February 15, except for next week, where
I have a scheduling conflict.
There will be a public reading
on Sunday, February 16, at
The Guild, and I will most
likely be one of the actors. The reading will, of course, feature work from
the just-concluded course.
The "studio" setup in the corner of a room in
my little abode.
Last night I laid down harmonic solo work on the unfinished song with
the working title of "New Short Rocker."
More production tricks were involved. I played a main solo on my bass, high
up on the neck, still employing the capo
for both this and then the harmonic counter solo that I also recorded. That
was again high up on my bass neck. I migrated the tracks from my
Tascam DP-03 digital 8-track recorder
onto my new Macbook Pro
and into Final Cut Pro X.
There, besides adding some distortion type effects to both tracks, I also
processed them up an octave so they now sound like regular electric guitar
licks.
I still only have the barest of a beginning on lyrics, but I have some
concepts materializing in my brain. My idea for melody, especially for the
chorus, has not altered. I'm still shooting for words to match what has
already been gestating.
The "Dramatic"
reader.
Stuart Spencer on Skype.
Saturday, I did the dramatic reading
for the playwrights in the latest session of playwriting classes by the
Ohio Playwrights Circle.
It's always nice to lend a voice to new words for a playwright. I only played
a character in one work; for the others I read for, I was the narrator,
i.e.: I slated thise scripts and
read the necessary directions during the performance.
Also, during the class time there was a guest, via Skype, the playwright,
Stuart Spencer,
who is the author of
The Playwright's Guidebook,
which is the textbook Michael London has been using for playwriting classes
for the last decade. Stuart spoke to the room for about a half hour. Of
the things he shared, what stuck out to me was his discussion of how all
the dialogue should have action ‐‐ which, I believe could be translated to
that dialogue should be somehow connected to the characters' wants or needs.
I do believe I'll be picking up Mr. Spencer's book.
I hate to be redundant but I'm still working on that third new song. The
big sticking point is lyrics. I have started three sets of lyrics but all
have felt wrong. I think thematically I've been in the ballpark of what I
feel needs to partner with the music, yet I've not been satisfied with what
I've written thus far.
My last attempt started with a word game where I systematically scavenged
a dictionary to get semi-random word choices for a list. Then I tried using
that list to spark a set of lyrics. That sort of game has worked for me in
the past, for both lyrics and for prose fiction; it did not work this time.
It's also time to break the hiatus and get back to work on the latest draft
of my play manuscript. I haven't worked on it for a few weeks now. I should
get back to it. The procrastination comes from being at a difficult spot in
the ending with a problem I don't know how to solve. Rather than getting in
there and trying things, I've been putting off getting in there.
But, I'd like to have another table read
before spring, so I need to get a move on. Probably ought to set a date for
the table read, or at least a deadline to finish this draft.
Thus far, this season, my batting average for getting clearance to use
dialogue from the scripts in the promocasts
for the plays has been a gigantic
0. The losing
streak continues with
Mr. Rickey Calls a Meeting.
I never received a response from either the playwright nor his agent to
multiple attempts to contact them requesting said permission. That clearly
means that once again there will not be a need for a special shoot with
the actors specifically acting chosen moments for the camera.
Principal photography
will again be shot during
dress/tech rehearsals
with me getting candid shots from the sidelines, which will then be used
MOS (no sound) with music under
the footage. Of course, that's not my favorite way to do it, but,
what-a-ya-gonna-do?
"New Short Rocker" is such a simple little ditty, why the hell
can't I write a decent set of lyrics to it? I've been making the attempts,
but nothing that has come to me has fit.
I'm keeping my eyes and ears open for anything that will spark the right
flame, whether it's a concept, or a strong title idea, or some catchy
phrase, anything that will jumpstart inspiration.
I'm thinking I may want to put this in the background, still being vigilant
about it, but meanwhile, move onto to song #4. I think I may be digging
back into the past to a song I wrote with my old music collaborator,
Rich Hisey, a song we wrote together over forty years ago.
Jesus!: "Over forty years ago!"
First things, first: let me point out that this is K.L.'s Blog: A Diary
of Artful Things. This isn't a news blog, or any sort of news-oriented
web page. The expedience of getting the information out as soon as possible
doesn't have the same import here as it would were this a news-reporting
site. On the other hand, it's difficult to argue that recounting now, in
January of 2020, a weekend in May of 2019 might be pushing it greatly in
the opposite direction from timeliness. It's taken more than a half year;
what can I say? Then I also have just missed my last goal to post this on
December 31, because I got caught up in making music over my winter holiday
break (see the
January 1 post,
above.) But, here I am now.
Finally. So, let's get started.
My seat at The Shubert: Right Orchestra, Row H, Seat 8.
The SorkinMockingbird, was the impetus for the trek to New York City last May.
The other NYC events were add-ons. It was a year ago that I saw the
significant ad for the Broadway production, I believe on facebook. I am a
member of a couple of fan groups for
The West Wing
and I'm pretty sure one of the other members posted a promotion for the
play with a "tickets are now available for May" message. A fellow
Dayton theatre person had already gone to see it, in
Previews,
I believe. She raved about it. I'd also read a couple glowing reviews,
both referred to from fan group members. I thought to myself, You keep
telling yourself you should break your Broadway cherry; you might as well
do it with this one. On January 6, 2019, I went on-line and bought the
best seat available at
the Shubert
for the Saturday matinee on May 11: Right Orchestra, Row H, Seat 8. After
fees and taxes, it was a $439.75 ticket.
Then, because it was much cheaper than I was anticipating it to be, I booked
a room in the Theatre District
at the Belvedere Hotel
on 48th Street. It ended up being a $964 bill for three nights, tax, parking,
and other fees. That was, seriously, less than I would have guessed for a
down-town weekend stay in New York City.
Then, I started plotting other things to do, other shows to see. But first,
let's deal with Mockingbird:
The famous Sardi's,
almost directly across 44th Street from the Shubert.
The Barriers set around the stage door at The Shubert.
My playbill with cast autographs.
The cerimonial
vacation
ice cream ‐‐ this time from Ben & Jerry's.
My Blackbird actor's script, signed by Jeff Daniels.
The day after the performance, whilst still using my Belvedere hotel room
as my base of operations, I wrote the following for the
May 12, 2019 blog post:
In a nutshell, making the trip and spending the money to see this
script performed by these actors was worth it. At
curtain call
the audience gave a standing ovation. Often when that happens, I
don't stand. Such audience response needs to be earned, not by
"good" work, but by extraordinary work. I stood.
Sometimes the Standing O is appropriate.
I don't get to a lot of theatre productions with screenstars on stage. I
have seen William Petersen
on stage three times in Chicago, once at
Victory Gardens
(which we'll talk about later), then twice, after that, at
steppenwolf.
I also saw Sandra Oh
at Victory Gardens, but must admit, I had not seen any of her screen work
at the time, including
Grey's Anatomy.
I also saw
Corbin Bleu
in Michael Slades'sFamily Shots,
here, locally, at the Human Race Theatre Company;
but, again, I had not remembered seeing Corbin on screen, in the
High School Musical
franchise, which I definitely had not seen, nor in anything else from his
screen résumé (though I'm betting I have seen some of his
screenwork and just haven't made the connection). My point in mentioning
this is that I have both read and have heard first hand accounts from those
I know, of famous, fine screen actors who are not adept at stage work, and
who have been disappointing in the latter. All the people I've mentioned
here gave strong performances when I saw them on stage.
The Mockingbird Broadway cast was rife with screen veterans. Of
course, there was
Jeff Daniels
in the role of Atticus. There were also other familiar faces to me, one of
the other two most prominent to me being
Frederick Weller,
who's done a lot of great screen work, but will always have a fond spot in
my heart as Mar. Marshall Mann on
In Plain Sight.
There was also Dakin Matthews,
a fine veteran actor for decades who, unless you just don't watch TV or go
to the movies, you have seen do some fine work. As much I've seen him over
the years, I most associate him with his role of Headmaster Charleston in
Gilmore Girls.
In Mockingbird, Weller was Bob Ewell, Matthews was Judge Taylor.
Another actor who was quite familiar to me was
Phyllis Somerville,
who, again, has been on a lot of TV shows and in a lot of movies, but whom
I remember the most for her performance as Det. Diane Russell's abused and
fragile mother on a few episodes of
NYPD Blue.
Somerville played Mrs. Dubose in Mockingbird, the mean neighbor who
riles Scout and Jem Finch, especially Jem.
Since this was a Broadway, Equity production,
virtually, if not wholly, every actor in the playbill has an
IMdB page.
But these are all clearly actors equally skilled at stagework as they are
at camera work. This was a strong cast, all the way around. Because of the
controversial licensing debacle that hit not long after I had bought my
B'Way ticket, the Dayton Playhouse
had the limited opportunity to mount this Sorkin script, last fall, as a
gesture from the Broadway producers who had instigated the blocking of DPH
from mounting the orginal script in the late winter of 2019.
Click here
for more detailed writing by me on this particular fiasco. For the
record, on the off chance you click and read that piece, I later came to
believe that pretty much none of the blame falls on the Broadway
producer, Scott Rudin, who was originally seen as the major bad guy in the
story.
I mention the DPH Mockingbird here because I attended the local
mounting of the Sorkin script and found it a worthy production that did the
script justice. But several times I was asked to compare the Dayton Playhouse
production to the Broadway one, a comparison I refused to give, because it
would not be a fair fight between the two. There were several stellar
performances in the DPH production, to be sure, but the Broadway production
was a Class-A professional production where the producers had a rich pool
of amazing career actors to cast from, and it was mounted by the highly skilled
director Bartlett Sher,
and utilized highly skilled designers, etc, etc.
Jeff Daniels was exactly as fantastic as one would expect him to be, so
there was no surprise there. In case you haven't heard, however, the buzz
has all been about the stand-out performance by
Celia Keenan-Bolger
in the role of Scout Finch. I am here to tell you that the buzz was dead-on
correct. She was amazing! Hers was absolutely one of the best performances
I have ever seen on a stage; it may be the best I've ever seen.
And here's the part that I love, love, love:
I got to tell a Tony-award-winning actor that her Tony-award-winning
performance was fantastic and amazing, before she won that Tony
award for that performance!!
Keenan-Bolger was 41 years old when I saw her in May of last year, yet she
spent the significant portion of the two-and-a-half hours as a
twelve-year-old and she more than simply sold herself as the childhood
Scout, she embodied the youthful Scout with such skill and acumen. It was
a brilliant performance that will stay with me. I was in awe of her work,
and am to this day. That she is a petite woman doesn't hurt, but it was her
limber physicality and her savvy ability to exude youth in her persona
that locked the performance.
LaTanya Richardson Jackson,
who has a couple other impressive
Broadway credits,
was also quite strong as Calpurnia, a role that Sorkin has made more
prominent than she was in the original playscript or in the screenplay.
Sorkin made her the African-American voice of the story in a deeply relevant
manner, and Ms. Jackson was up to the task, landing an impactful performance.
Dakin Matthews' Judge Taylor was fun, especially his bemusement at some of
the ridiculousness from the young prosecuting attorney,
(Stark Sands).
Frederick Weller was disturbing as the ignorant, menacing, racist Bob Ewell;
suffice to say that, that was not Marshall Mann on that stage. Just
the whole cast was great. There was not a week performance in the Broadway
production. So let's just repeat ourselves here:
In a nutshell, making the trip and spending the money to see this
script performed by these actors was worth it.
Of course, I hung out at the
stage door
after the matinée to get my playbill signed. The very first actor out
was Dakin Matthews, and, by-the-way, the only actor who signed my playbill
with his full name, I might add. Dakin was quite nice. The rest gave
autographs that were initials:
Gbenga Akinnagbe
(Tom Robinson), Stark Sands (Horace Gilmer), LaTanya Richardson Jackson
(Calpurnia), and Celia Keenan-Bolger (Scout). All of them were very gracious.
Ms. Keenan-Bolger was especially gracious. She was so appreciative of the
good words about her brilliant performance.
One actor who did not come out was Frederick Weller (Bob Ewell). I later
was told by someone that they had read that he was not coming out because
of the negative response to Ewell being such a bastard. But, that is the
only account of that I have so, take it for what it's worth, though it
could make sense. I would have loved to have met him and gave him some
positive response on his work, because, his Ewell was a bastard,
just as he was supposed to be.
The other actor who did not come out after the matinée
performance was Mr. Daniels. Beyond the fact that it's Jeff Daniels, the
other reason I was disappointed was that I had in mind getting his
autograph on something other than the Mockingbird playbill.
In August of 2009, I went to Chicago to see the
David Harrower
play Blackbird at the Victory Gardens,
with William Petersen in the role of Ray. It blew me away. Everything about
it blew me away: Harrower's script, the performances by Petersen and his
co-star Mattie Hawkinson.
I left the theatre that day promising myself that I was going to do that
show, one way or another. It took a couple years, but in April of 2011
Blackbird went up for a weekend
at The Guild
with myself in the role of Ray and
Heather Atkinson
opposite me in the role of Una.
Natasha Randall
directed. Thus far it has been one of my favorite theatre experiences, one
of the best I've ever had.
When I knew I was going to see him in Mockingbird and then found
out that he did indeed come out of the stage door to sign autographs, I
knew I was taking my Blackbird actor's script to have him sign ‐‐
so it went into the suitcase for the trip.
But then, after the May 11th matinée, Jeff didn't come out to give
autographs. I decided I'd drop by after the matinée, the next day,
to try again. Only one problem: I realized, I had another show to get to on
Sunday with a 6:00 curtain.
The Sunday Mockingbird wouldn't get to final curtain
until just about 5:30. It would be at least another fifteen minutes before
Jeff or anyone else even would come out of the stage door. The theatre I
needed to get to was a ten-minute walk away. It was clear that I risked
not making that 6:00 curtain. I didn't want to risk it.
I had a ticket to see
Curse of the Starving Class,
by Sam Shepard
that evening of the 11th, at the
Signature Theatre,
(just a block down the street from where I would be 6:00 next evening).
Though I really wanted to see Curse of the Starving Class, getting the
Blackbird script signed by Jeff was more important to me. I sacrificed
Curse for another chance at getting Jeff's autograph.
In the evening of the 11th, I walked back down to the Shubert Theatre area
to be at the stage door in plenty of time before the evening performance
ended. Time Square is just down the street; I had some time to kill before
the evening Mockingbird was over, so I walked around Time Square. I
also took the opportunity to get my cerimonial
vacation
ice cream at
Ben & Jerry's,
pretty much across 44th from the Shubert.
Around 9:30 or so, about an hour before the show would end, intermittent
light spinkles of rain began. Ahh, shit! I thought, It's gonna be
raining when the show let's out and none of the actors are going to want to
come out and sign anything! This damn sporadic, tease of a threat of
rain kept insinuating itself and agitating the hell out of me.
However, somewhere around 10:45, it wasn't raining as cast members started
to come out. Once again, as in the afternoon, Dakin Matthews was the first
actor out. When he came around to me and reached for my script, I said,
"I actually got you this afternoon."
"Oh, okay."
"But, I'm sure you were just as brillant this evening as
you were this afternoon."
Dakin chuckled, then softly said, "Well, I don't know, I'm pretty
tired."
Finally, Mr. Jeff Daniels came out of the stage door. He was pretty
reserved. I got the sense that perhaps he's a little uncomfortable with
this autograph-giving thing.
When he got to me I handed him the Blackbird script and said,
"You and I have a role in common."
Now, I didn't expect him to invite me out for coffee to discuss the journey
of playing Ray, but I was hoping for a little bit of a reaction, of a
recognition that we had both had the opportunity to play a difficult role
with an odd sort of moral ambiguity to it. He did not acknowledge at all
that he even recognized the script. I was a little disheartened. I had
gotten my hopes up ‐‐ so that's on me. He certainly wasn't out of line. I'd
just hoped for a little moment, a little connection that didn't happen.
But, hey! Jeff Daniels signed my Blackbird script!
So
Fiddler on the street.
My Yiddish Fiddler seat: 5 rows back, 3 in from the
aisle.
As I was planning my trip, it occurred to me that my old cast mate,
Bruce Sabath
was playing Leyzer-Volf (Lazar Wolf) in the Off-Broadway
production of Fiddler on the Roof, in Yiddish,
and that he was also understudy
for Tevya. I looked up that show; tickets ran about $100. I was already
dropping well over $1500, so I messaged Bruce to say that if I could figure
out how to work it into my budget, I was coming to see his show.
Bruce messaged back for me to hold off getting a ticket, that he could
probably get me a staff discount ticket. So, despite the fact that I'd
already scouted out a couple really sweet seats open on the 12th, I weighed
that against the discount, which turned out to be a better discount than I'd
anticipated. I went with the discount because, really, with only 499 seats,
the venue, Stage 42,
doesn't have a bad seat in the house. I would have to wait until closer to
the date to secure the exact seat through the staff discount, but, as it
turned out, the better of the two seats I'd scouted earlier was still
available, only five rows back, and that's the one I got.
Only about a week or two before I made my trek to New York, Bruce stepped
into the role of Tevye for about a week of performances while the
principal,
Steven Skybell,
was on vacation. I was kind of bummed. As much as I knew I would enjoy
Bruce as Lazar (or, Leyzer), it would have been lovely to see him as Tevye.
Then, earlier the Sunday of the show, while I was at
The Met,
Bruce messaged me:
BRUCE: "You're seeing my Tevye after all!!"
K.L.: "Wow! Okay. So you'll have to fill me in! This is cool."
BRUCE: "Steve is just sick today!"
Fiddler in Yiddish was nothing less than excellent, all the way
around. I was quite impressed with Bruce as Tevye. The cast in general, was
impressive. The vocals were all lovely and the Bottle Dance was executed
flawlessly. The rest of the choreography was enjoyable, too. This was a cast
chalk full of
tripple threats.
The whole production was top-notch. Kudos to the cast, the designers,
and to Joel Grey,
the director. It was another stellar production to make my
"vacation
in New York in May" a great weekend.
I have another spotting of a screen actor I recognized. In the role of
Yente was Jackie Hoffman,
whom I recognize from quite a bit of TV. Most recently I remember her from
the "Summer" and "Fall" episodes of
Gilmore Girls: A Year in the Life.
As for watching a production only spoken and sung in Yiddish, with some
Russian, it was not a problem. First of all, I've been in the show twice
myself; I've also seen it several times, either on stage or the movie;
lastly, there were supertitles
on both sides of the proscenium. But, honestly, I rarely looked at the
supertitles; I pretty much knew what was going on all through the show.
Over the course of the run, Bruce has posted quite a few back-stage pics of
him with heavy-hitter, A-list actors who have come to see the show. Two that
immediately come to mind are
Mandy Pitinkin and
Alan Alda.
There have been a lot of others, but, I'm not recalling them. Bruce wrote
that Pitinkin was so moved that he was in tears. When Alda was there, not
too long before my visit, Bruce said they talked for something like 45
minutes about the history of Fiddler as well as about the acting
craft in general. What a great experience that must have been!
As I sat in the audience before the show, I looked around to see if I could
spy anyone. I saw no big-leaguers in the audience. After show, when I was
back stage, there was also a family that had won back stage passes. The
daughter revealed that Jerry Seinfeld
and his family was sitting the row in front of her and her family. The
PSM
confirmed that she had also became aware just befdore curtain, but didn't
say anything to the cast because she was pretty sure Seinfeld was not going
to come back afterward.
Had I seen him, I doubt I would have approached him, but, it would have been
cool to have actually laid eyes on him. It was already pretty cool to know
I saw the show with him ‐‐ celebrity is weird.
As I asserted when I was blogging about planning this trip to New York,
there was no way I was going to be in New York City, and in such close
proximity to
The Metropolitan Museum of Art (The Met)
without paying it a visit. When I did the Google mapping of the
Theatre District,
where I'd be staying, I discovered that The Met was only a forty-five-minute
walk from my hotel, through
Central Park.
There was my Sunday morning ‐‐ a stroll through Central Park to The Met and
back, and I'd still have plenty of time to get to Fiddler by it's
6:00 curtain. There were some Central Park things I wanted to check out,
Strawberry Fields,
the John Lennon
memorial, being one of them.
I'd had tentative plans to meet up with a New York theatre colleague for
brunch or lunch on Saturday, but, as it turned out, he had forgotten that
he'd be out of town. So, fortunately I elected to go checkout Central Park
Saturday morning, because Sunday it rained. I still walked to The Met on
Sunday, but, going there, I walked up 5th Avenue, along side the park;
though I did walk back through the park.
With my visit to The Met I ran into the same dilemma I had a few years back
at The Art Institute of Chicago:
I didn't have enough time to peruse and take in all that I wished to take
in. In fact, with The Met, the ticket is good for three days, because you
can utilize all three days and probably still miss something you'd
rather not. I have plans to, at some point, go back to the Art Institute
of Chicago when I can dedicate more time to a visit, and the same is now
true for The Met.
I've set up a separate page to park the photos I took of Met artwork:
In between the two out of three shows that I did get to during my weekend,
I did a few other touristy things.
I had a few good foodie experiences. Friday evening, upon the recommendation
of the Belvedere
desk clerk, I walked down to
Amarone Ristorante
around the corner from the hotel, on 9th Avenue, for dinner. Now that it's
been more than a half-year, I'm not sure what I ordered. I do know that the
meal was quite good, I just am not sure what I got. I probably got the
Chicken Parmigiana.
If I ate lunch that Saturday, I didn't charge it to a card, and I have no
memory of it. I am thinking I may have bought something from a vendor in or
near Central Park,
but I have no distinct memory of that. My Saturday dinner was at
Ollie's Sichuan
on West 42nd *(no pic of the spot). I got the Chicken with garlic sauce ‐‐
(Fingers tips to lips and then cascade them
out while saying: "Mm-whah!")
Sunday lunch was at the Public Cafeteria at
The Met,
and who knows what I got, probably a chicken sandwich. But I do remember
that I had a nice Massaman curry chicken dish for dinner at
Yum Yum Too
on 9th Ave., before I attended
Fiddler on the Roof
*(again, no pic of the location).
I have no idea why I find it relevant to recount my NYC trip
cuisine, but, there you go....
The two big things, as this section suggests, were spending some time in
Central Park
and at The Met.
Since I wasn't able to arrange a breakfast, brunch, or lunch with any of
my NYC theatre peeps, I decided to head over to Central Park, rather than
just checking it out on my way to The Met the next morning. Workout well,
too, because Saturday was a lovely, sunny day, but Sunday it was raining
and chilly. But Saturday, I walked over and spent a couple hours strolling
the park, people watching, checking out the
buskers,
and visiting a few featured sights. I actually thought about the
Central Park Zoo,
but I never made it in, mostly because I did need to get back to the hotel
in time to get ready for the
Mockingbird
afternoon matinée.
Again, it's good that I went on Saturday. In fact, as I wrote above, Sunday,
on the way to The Met, I didn't walk through the park, but rather walked
around it and up 5th Avenue to the museum. But, as it was mostly only
drizzling as I walked back to my hotel, I did walk back through the park,
and there are a few photos below from that Sunday stroll.
So, here are photos of my time in Central Park over that weekend in May,
some with captions and commentary:
Some sort of workout session taking place by the
fountain square, maybe Pilates?
An attendee of that workout class, jogging the steps.
One of my Sunday, raining in Central Park, photos.
I really like this one. I do believe I'll be
finding a significant future use for it.
Technically, these pics are more than just from the actual
"Time Square";
some of them are from
"Broadway Row"
in the area of the Shubert
all within close walking distance to Time Square, close enough that it's
mention as a part of Time Square at the official website.
Most of these photos were taking Saturday evening as I was killing time
around the Shubert, waiting for the evening performance of
Mockingbird
to get out so I could make that final attempt to get
Jeff Daniels
to sign my
Blackbird
actor's edition script, having sacrificed my ticket to
Curse of the Starving Class,
at the
Signature Theatre
to satisfy my autograph quest.
Here are some Time Square and Broadway District photos from my weekend:
Another of my favorite photos from the trip ‐‐
dudes playing chess in Times Square.
As we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead. We
cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil
rights, "When will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied
as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police
brutality. We can never be satisfied, as long as our bodies, heavy with the
fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and
the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro's
basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be
satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their selfhood and robbed
of their dignity by signs stating "For Whites Only". We cannot be
satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New
York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not
satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like
waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.
I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and
tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of
you have come from areas where your quest for freedom left you battered by
the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality.
You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the
faith that unearned suffering is redemptive.
Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go
back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of
our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be
changed. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair.
I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of
today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in
the American dream.
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true
meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that
all men are created equal."
I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former
slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together
at the table of brotherhood.
I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state
sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of
oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation
where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content
of their character.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists,
with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition
and nullification; one day right there in Alabama, little black boys and
black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white
girls as sisters and brothers.
I have a dream today.
I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and
mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the
crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be
revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.
This is our hope. This is the faith that I go back to the South with. With
this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of
hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of
our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will
be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to
jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be
free one day.
This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with a
new meaning, "My country, 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee
I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim's pride, from every
mountainside, let freedom ring."
And if America is to be a great nation this must become true. So let freedom
ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from
the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening
Alleghenies of Pennsylvania!
Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado!
Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California!
But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia!
Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee!
Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi. From every
mountainside, let freedom ring.
And when this happens, when we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring
from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we
will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and
white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to
join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "Free at
last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!"
On Mar 15th, Jennifer will have just ended, (that very afternoon, in fact)
her run as a cast member in the HRTC production of
Gloria: a Life,
which opens Feb 27.
I have ticket for Jennifer's OPS on
March 15. I'll likely see Gloria on Can Night.
Finally, I have a set of lyrics for the what was the "New Short
Rocker," now with the official title, "Hammer Down." I
started them Wednesday night and finished last night, though there's always
the prospect of some tweaks or revisions. There has already been a bit of
rewriting during the whole process of writing this draft as it is. Right
now I have tentative plans to record the vocals this weekend. I may add
some final instrumentation, as well. I'm thinking about a "horn
flourish" at the end of the song.
My plan for last night was to record the lead vocal, and possibly the
backing vocals in the chorus sections, for "Hammer Down." But my
focus instead was on the lyrics. Remember that I said that is was probable
that there would be further tweaking to them, and there were.
Then, on further reflection, some lines, as they were, in what was the
"finished" lyrics on Thursday lost their luster to me and I felt
the need to either tweak them (change a word or two) or totally rewrite them.
The sticking point at the moment is a line that has the word
"hegemony." It's not a bad use the of word, I don't even find the
use pretentious, but it's not working as well as I originally thought it
would. Plus, it's the last word of the last line that takes us into the
lead break, and it doesn't have the bang that I want going into that
section. So, I'm looking for a line with more bite for that spot in the
song.
I could have probably started rehearsing the vocal, even with some lyrics
that won't be in the recorded version, but I focused on getting the final
draft of the lyrics locked. They still aren't totally locked just yet.
Still, there's some chance that at least the lead vocal will get recorded
before I go to bed tonight.
MORE READING FOR PLAYWRIGHTS:
Yesterday morning I dropped in to again be a reader
for the latest Ohio Playwrights Circle play writing class. I missed last
week because I needed to stay for the entire
Dayton Theatre Guild
board meeting. But I should make all the rest of the OPC sessions.
I also assume I will participate in the
public reading on February
16, as well.
ANOTHER DTG OPENING:
Mr. Rickey opened Friday, and I sing pretty much the same song that
I always do about a Guild Opening Night:
I was there, but was busy as a house manager
so I didn't really see the performance, as per usual. But, as is another
"per usual," the performance was well received by the audience
and the cast and crew felt good about the show. So, we're clearly off to
a good start with another good production.
Yesterday evening, as I worked on justifying the vocal with the lyrics for
"Hammer Down" I came to a conclusion: These aren't the
lyrics for this music, after all. In fact, I'm less and less enamored with
this set of lyrics, just on their own, as time goes by. With distance from
the inception of the lyrics, I now find them forced and clunky and lacking
any resemblance to being eloquent.
We are now back to no lyrics for the song, and the song is back to the
workshop title, "New Short Rocker." Perhaps some lines or phrases
will be salvaged from "Hammer Down," either for the set of lyrics
this song eventually gets, or for something else. Essentially, though, I'm
starting over on the lyrics for this one. This new attempt will be the
fourth set.
A little bit more work has been done on the latest draft of my play manuscript,
"draft 4B." Thus far, this pass through, I've gone from the top
of Act 1 and swept through, doing some clean up, mostly tightening. Though,
at one point, I did add a line, for clarity. Now to jump back into rewriting
the ending. I'm hoping I have another private
table reading before spring,
and I hope with the same readers.
There's been more work done. Again, I took another pass through the whole
manuscript for some more tightening. This time I actually added to the end
of the manuscript, the new ending.
I had to stop and work on the story bible
for some clarity and for some continuity
running over any and all vehicles that stories from this universe might
appear in.
It looks like I have a few gigs coming up for the
U.D. School of Law. One of them
will put my participation in the
Ohio Playwrights Circlepublic reading on Feb 16 at
The Guild because I might
not be able to make rehearsal for that now. But, you know, as much as I
love doing these OPC readings, a paying gig is a paying gig.
I had every intention of making the second night of auditions for
Morning's at Seven,
Tuesday, but the screenshot to the left, of my late Tuesday evening
facebook post, shows: it didn't happen. C'est la vie.
NEW LYRICS AND A NEW TITLE FOR THE 'NEW SHORT ROCKER':
Song #3 is now back to having an official title: "Then I'll
Sing." My hope is that this stays the title, or if it changes, it won't
be because the lyrics were scrapped but rather that a better title came to
me.
Technically, I suppose these new lyrics, which are almost but not completely
finished, are pass number 5; I wrote a stanza that I soon scratched, which
should probably be number 4. But, I'm considering these new lyrics as those
of the fourth pass, since the previous was only one stanza that I quickly
threw out.
This past Saturday evening, I wrote the first version of the first verse,
during, what I must admit, was a borderline morose weekend. I was in the
depths of a lusterless state. But I was also feeling a rather subdued anger,
a muted frustration, that I wasn't finding a set of lyrics that worked with
this music. So, to take a page from
Bobby Lamm, of the
legendary band, Chicago, I at
least started off the song by writing about how I wasn't finding
inspiration for the lyrics, which is the theme of Lamm's Chicago song,
"25 or 6 to 4,"
and of which I make direct mention in, "Then I'll Sing."
Thus far, "Then I'll Sing" hasn't completely lost that theme, but
it's married to the sense of melancholy that held on to me this weekend. I
got back to the lyrics late Sunday and wrote several more verses and the
words to the chorus section. Since then, I've tweak things and I'm not done
with that. There are some verse stanzas left to write and I have a little
interlude to put words to, as well.
As I mentioned in previous blog posts, I am going to add a "horn
chart" toward the end of the song, as well. If I don't lay down tracks
in the evenings this week, at least the lead and backing vocals, my current
goal is this coming Saturday. I'd love for the song to be stereo mixed by
this time next week. Whether that will be or not is another question.
A few pages have been added to the ending of the play. Though, full disclosure,
some good portion of that "new" material was deleted material that
is cut-and-pasted back in from the previous draft, some with minor rewriting.
It was always understood that I would do this.
I knew I was not permanently excising everything from after the point where
I had deleted things for this new draft. It's simply much cleaner to have
white* space to write on rather than try to keep track on the working draft
of what will stay but be likely moved around and reconfigured.
The bulk of this ending section is still taking a different, and I certainly
hope more interesting, route to get to those final words, which I am keeping.
I like the very ending as it is, as I am sure I have stated before. Getting
to that ending, on the other hand, was a little weak, more than a little
muddy, and a bit of an energy drain in the previous drafts. Plus, the
biggest problem about the ending, it almost comes out of nowhere. When you
have a good ending that is coming off almost like a
Deus ex machina, you know
there is a problem.
Most of what has been added back now has shades of different motivations
and purposes. There's still a lot of material that has been cut that I don't
think is coming back, not in this play. However, I wouldn't say some or all
of it would not end up in some other works about these characters and their
universe.
*That's right, Final Draft
users, I keep my FD background white, not blue, that which I know
so many script writers prefer. And yet, I write html code on a
light blue background....go figure. (Although, on my
Final Draft iPhone app,
it's a black background with white text).
Speaking of Ohio Playwrights Circle play writing class, tomorrow morning
I'll again be a reader. Once again
I missed last week, this time because I was sick. And I'll miss the last
class, a week from tomorrow because I have a gig booked. It's also looking
like I will not participate in the
public reading, the next day
on February 16, only because I may not be available to
rehearse.
The lyrics are "done," save for possible little tweaks. The
title did change, but it isn't because there is another new set
of lyrics, it's because I wrote another line in the lyrics that makes a
better title: "Into the Blue Dawn."
I would have recorded vocals last night but I've had a bit of a cold
and I didn't want to lay vocal tracks until my voice is better. I'm going
to give my voice a test run shortly after uploading this post, so I might
be recording the vocals this morning.
Nothing new has actually been keyed in since the last mention of the play
manuscript, but I have made some decisions about things to throw into the
mix, so, in all reality, some "writing" has been done, if only
mentally.
A little piece that had been toward the end in the previous draft, the
one that got a table reading,
is getting added in close to the start of Act 1:Scene 1. I also have a good
idea for some tension in the new ending. There certainly has been a strong
setup for it and I think it's a tension that some in the audience will
anticipate and might even feel is missing if it's not there. I think this
new tension, this new conflict, will help build to the climax. Also, it
gives just a little bit more dimension to one of the characters.
I'm still shooting for my next
closed reading by early
spring at the latest, and I hope before winter is over.
In a NYC hotel room, in the spring of 1947, Branch Rickey, owner of
the Brooklyn Dodgers, meets with four prominent African-Americans to
discuss breaking the color barrier in Major League Baseball. He wants
support from their community to help with the controversy he knows
will ensue. Jackie Robinson, Joe Louis, Paul Robeson, and Bill
Robinson, aka Mr. Bojangles, attend the meeting, but it isn't an easy
fix. Concern about loss of jobs, as well as suspicion about Branch
Rickey's motives come into play. The 2012 revival was nominated for
three Jeff Awards for Play Production, Direction, and Ensemble.
The Cast of Mr. Rickey Calls a Meeting
(in order of appearance)
CHARACTER
NOTES
Branch Rickey
Saul Caplan
Jackie Robinson
Shaun Diggs
Clancy Hope
Robert Culpepper
Joe Louis
Robert-Wayne Waldron
Paul Robeson
Edward Hill
Bill "Bojangles" Robinson
Franklin Johnson
The Promocast for Mr. Rickey Calls a Meeting
Today I'll finally see the whole show. When I did
principal photography
for the promocast, I didn't stay
for the whole dress run.
Since I hadn't got clearance to use dialogue, all I was looking for was
interesting action (movement), and once I had just a little more than enough,
I left. So, now, I go catch the whole thing before it closes. I often use
my season ticket for the final performance since I'm going to be there for
set strike, anyway.
My voice didn't pass the test run yesterday morning, and I didn't bother
testing it again in the evening, because it had backslid to scratchier and
rougher. So, no vocal tracks were laid yesterday for "Into the Blue
Dawn." There were, however, a few tweaks to the lyrics.
I probably could have started work on the horn chart, but, for some
reason, I want to get the vocals all laid down first.
Draft 4B is chugging along. Since my voice wasn't in good enough shape to
record the vocals for "Into the Blue Dawn," yesterday morning, I
fired up Final Draft and worked
on the play.
I incorporated the elements from the ending of Act 2 in the previous draft
to the early part of Act 1 of this draft, as I said I would. I have not
yet gotten to adding the element of tension at the end that I wrote of
yesterday. That will happen soon.
I'm also thinking about adding something else. A big thing this play deals
with is something that happened thirteen years earlier and the ramifications
of that incident, which reverberate right into the present time of the play.
It's quite literally material from my unpublished novel from the same universe.
There have already been references to other, related events that happen
toward the end of the novel. Most of those other references have been
preserved in this latest draft. My dilemma is that something really monumental
happens in the novel the same night as another event that is recounted in
the play, and it might serve me to use it; it might serve me
especially well.
Or, it could be the introduction of something so monumental at the ending
of the play that it seems like a desperate device brought in by a playwright
who's afraid that his ending is in trouble. I could end up trying to eliminate
the appearance of a Deus ex machina
by awkwardly adding in a new dramatic element that might come off as a
cheap trick.
In some ways, however, I'm thinking Big Picture. I'm trying to strike a
balance between serving the piece and serving the legacy of what I currently
fantasize will be an amalgamation of multiple works dealing with these people
and this universe, An amalgamation that has a decent audience out there. A
legacy where someone watching or reading this play might say, "How
could K.L.Storer have not even mentioned [THAT THING] that happened thirteen
years earlier on the same night as [THAT OTHER THING]? Awful important
occurrence to have ignored! I mean, it was a pretty profound event in
[CHARACTER'S] life!"
There's already one Easter egg
in the play that speaks to my hopes for a nice franchise, or whatever you
want to call it, of stories from this universe. That one I'm willing to keep
as an oblique reference because it is a vague reference one of the character's
makes to something that character does not really want to fully share at the
time the play takes place. But it's there for me; it's there to honor the
universe; it's there for someone later, I hope, to be able to say,
"Hey! I know what [CHARACTER] is talking about!"
It may be a little foolish, and certainly could be presumptuous for me to
think in this Big Picture manner. That there will ever be a time when
readers or viewers, whichever, would have enough background to recognize
when something important from the over-arching story of the characters is
missing, might be vainglory. That there will be a time when they pick up on
planted Easter eggs might be ridiculous to anticipate. But why not proceed
like these things will be? Why not think that big? If I end up being
delusional, well, then I end up being delusional. But if it becomes a
self-fulfilling prophecy,
then the play and any other works become richer, at least for some people.
Why not shoot for that?
Another dilemma for me is that the play has definite spoilers for the novel.
Major, important events from the novel are revealed in the play. Things
I'd rather those who will eventually read the novel won't know are coming,
one event most particularly. And this other thing I am contemplating
adding into the play? It's another big spoiler for the novel manuscript,
something else I wouldn't want the readers to know was coming. Despite my
angst, I'll probably at least try out dropping this other element into the
play manuscript to see if I can make it work and not come off as a
half-baked ploy. We're still in draft-mode. Things can get cut.
First off, apparently that @#$#@# gremlin
was in the house for the Saturday show!
At one point, there was an inexplicable buzzing that shot over the PA
speakers for a few seconds, seemingly out of nowhere.
When I was there yesterday, at one point we came to determine that a 35mm
sound input may have been loosely connected and caused a ground hum.
There were no such gremlin
shenanigans when I sat in the audience for the closing performance yesterday.
This was the first time I saw the whole show run. I have to say, it was a
mighty fine production with some stellar performances.
Hat's off to the cast (Saul Caplan, Robert Culpepper, Shaun Diggs, Edward
Hill, Franklin Johnson, and Robert-Wayne Waldron), director Rick Flynn, and
the production crew (Deirdre Bray Root - Producer & Properties, Michael
Favors - Stage Manager, Chris Harmon - Set Designer, Scott Wright - Lighting
Designer & tech, Sarah Saunders - Sound Designer & tech, and Carol
Finley - Costume Designer).
A point of interest to me is the question of just how right the playwright
got this imagined meeting. Mostly what interests me is how accurate were
the points of view of the black men in that hotel room. The question comes
to me because Ed Schmidt is
a middle-aged white man. I'm not necessarily skeptical that Schmidt achieved
something valid. I believe that writers can be smart enough, intuitive
enough, observant enough, and empathetic enough to successfully get to the
essence of a perspective that was foreign to themselves and their
experiences. I believe women writers can successfully write from the point
of view of men and vise versa, as example. Schmidt seems to have written
something that is authentic and valid. But, that's my own middle-aged white
guy's reception of the work. I'd be curious if African Americans, especially
African American men, found the text authentic and valid.
Because I will not be able to attend the rehearsal for the OPC
public reading on February
16, I am not primarily cast to be a reader.
I am a back-up, or, I suppose you could say I'm an
understudy. This doesn't
exactly fit that term, but it's not horribly dissimilar.
The reading is this Sunday, February 16, 2:00 pm, at
The Dayton Theatre Guild.
Admission is free.
With the inevitable exception of the obligatory tweaks that anybody who
knows me, knows I'm going to make, Draft 4B is finished.
*I actually tweaked a few things just
after I wrote the sentence above.
That hope of another private table reading
before the end of winter will certainly be realized. All I have to do now
is compare schedules with my readers.
I had, for about a minute, thought about having different readers, going
with the philosophy that different readers will give you a different take
on your characters. It's a valid point. But I decided I'd rather have the
same readers judging differences they perceive in the characters, or the
characters' parts of the story arch, whatever those difference may be. I
already know one of the readers is on board, I'm just waiting for word from
the others.
As I've mentioned before, I've liked the ending from the previous drafts, I
just didn't believe it was journeyed to well. I have kept that ending with
some adjustments due to the new buildup to it. But with the new overall
last section of Act 2, the ending is earned now, so it's stronger.
At this point I am happy with both those new elements I recently wrote that
I was putting into the ending section. One of them I am exceedingly confident
about, the other, I think works, but I am prepared for others to say things
along the lines of, "It's too much." It will depend on the strengths
and merits of their arguments as to whether I contemplate cutting that
element. It may not be too dfficul for the nay-sayers to make their argument,
either. This element does serve well the purpose I brought it on for. And
it is that element that, in the universe of these characters, has a strong
historical import that my "big picture" side thinks can't be
ignored. But, there is some chance it's not going to work overall in the
context of this particular manuscript. But, for now I'm leaving it in to
see what happens.
In terms of the "obligatory tweaks," I will be making a sweep
through to see if there is any language in dialogue that I want to change.
I've already done some of that, finding little phrases and wordings that
I've realized don't feel right for a particular character. I want to make
a pass through focusing on that sort of clean up.
Overall, however, I'm please with this draft. All the changes, I think
better serve the story. The rewrites,
the revisions, the rearranging,
the fresh elements, have all improved the manuscript. Distance will likely
alter some of my response, I'm sure. But still, now it's time for the next
test run.
This Saturday morning I have the first of two Saturdays in a row on a
particular gig for U.D. School of Law.
This is a new case to me so I have material to get to know. Because of being
on the last stretch of the latest draft of my play manuscript, I haven't
yet sat down and started learning the information for this case. But, I
will start that process tonight, and I have taken a
vacation
day from the rent-payer,
tomorrow, to get the info into my head.
I have copies of all the scripts that will be read. I think most are
essentially ten-minute plays,
but one, I believe, is actually a scene from a
full-length.
Again, here's the info on the reading:
OHIO PLAYWRIGHTS CIRCLE Public Reading
February 16, 2020 - 2:00-5:00 pm Dayton Theatre Guild
430 Wayne Ave, Dayton, OH 45410
Refreshments will be served
ADMISSION IS FREE
At this point, I have two of my original readers
back on board for the soon(?)-to-come closed table read.
I have not heard back, as of yet, from the third. I may need to replace
that reader, plus I need to gain a reader to be narrator
(who reads any setting, directions, etc., that will be necessary to hear).
I'm giving that third reader a couple more days to respond about reprising
the role, then I'm moving on.
Fortunately, this is one of the easier roles to replace. There are a
many actors out there who can type
into this role. In reality, one doesn't necessarily have to have actors who've
been typecasted into a role
for any sort of reading, but, I feel the need to at least come close for
this manuscript. I've already started making a list of those I can approach
about taking over the role. I'd rather not, but, you know,
things is what they is. Type, on the other
hand doesn't really need to be considered for the narrator.
And, but, of course, there's been tweaking of the text going on, pretty
minor stuff, but tweaking all the same. I should probably stop and put
the manuscript aside for the moment. I think that because I'm moving into
the mindset of doubting and second-guessing the damned thing, or at least
large portions of it. I think maybe this table read needs to happen as
soon as it can.
This past Saturday I did the first part that one particular gig for
U.D. School of Law. It went
well. As I wrote before, this was a new case for me. It's a wrongful
death, civil suit, where I played a psychiatrist for the plaintif and a
provate investigator for the defense. The P.I. is a moron, by the way,
with all sorts of holes in his testimony and a general ambience of
incompetence in his reported investigation. It's clear this is by design.
I've seen other cases where the particular witness or some part of their
"facts" are weak or compromised. Using him as a witness is a
challenge for the defense teram, but, again, I believe that's the idea.
As it turns out, I will not be doing the second part of this particular case
exercise next Saturday. I will be attending the memorial service for the
passing of the husband of one of my thespian colleagues, instead.
THE OPC PUBLIC READING, YESTERDAY:
Well, my quasi-understudy
status as a backup reader for the
public reading on Sunday did
not come in to play, as there were enough readers. I did come dressed in
blacks just in case. The blacks came in handy after all, as I ended up being
the light tech, which essentially
constituted bringing house lights up and down at the appropriate times. But,
I was in the booth, where blacks
are the appropriate attire, just as for the readers.
The reading went well. Including three of the four playwrights who were
there, there were about a dozen in attendance. Four pieces were read. I
had initially thought that three were ten-minute plays,
one was two scenes from a full-length play.
It turns out I was mistaken about that last one; it is only intended to be
those two scenes.
The plays presented were:
Oh Yes, You Can, by James Gruza
A Failure of the Will, by Adam Alonzo
The Candidate, by Lee Huntington
Homesick, by Steve Weaver
OPC/DRAMATISTS GUILD PLAYWRITING WORKSHOP:
On another note concerning the Ohio Playwrights Circle, OPC is holding a
one-day playwriting workshop, in conjunction with the
Dramatist Guild of America,
and hosted by The Human Race Theatre Company,
Sunday afternoon, March 1. It's billed as "A Playwriting Workshop and
Producer's Q & A."
I have signed up to attend. I'm never able to free up enough of my time to
commit to the OPC workshop series as other than a reader, because I never
can be sure I'd be able to give time and attention to the required writing
during the week. This stand-alone is something I can do, easily; and, I
don't believe there is any actual writing involved.
It'll be 4:00-6:00 pm, at The Metropolitan Arts Center in the Human Race
Theatre Company 2nd Floor Studio, 126 N Main St, Dayton, OH 45402.
At 4:00 will be a presentation titled, "Reworking for the Stage:
Adaptation and Revision."
"This talk is all about making progress on whatever project is
currently keeping you up at night. Whether you're daunted by the task
of adapting an existing work for the stage, stuck on the draft between
drafts of one of your plays, or maybe both, this talk is for you.
Jeremy Llorence, Otterbein
University's playwriting professor, will share personal stories of his
creative approaches in adaptation, revision, and the rehearsal process,
while providing some of his tools and exercises for taking that net big
creative step."
At 5:00, it will be "A Producer's Perspective: Q and A with Cleveland
Public Theatre's, Beth Wood."
"How do you get your foot in the door with a new theater? What are
producers looking for? In what ways are the national conversations about
new work changing? What's next? Join
Beth Wood,
Associate Artistic Director of
Cleveland Public Theatre, as
she shares her impressions and reflections on over a decade producing
new work.
Les Hunter,
Ohio Regional Representative of the Dramatists Guild of America, will
moderate this session."
PLAYWRIGHT WORK ‐‐
THIS JUST IN: ALL THE ORIGINAL READERS ARE ON BOARD:
I heard back from reader #3, who
gave a rounding "yes" to the next closed table read.
Now I approach a particular actor about being the narrator.
The last time I put a general "ISO" post on facebook for the narrator,
which I will do here, if the actor I query can't do it or isn't interested.
It's pretty much a casting move on
my part, just as was picking the three readers who are portraying the characters,
based on finding someone who can serve well the role of narrator
(not all actors can). This actor has to not have one specific association,
just as everyone esle who is privy to this manuscript cannot have that same
association.
Reader #4 (the narrator)
has come on board for the closed table read,
for which my first choice is as a March 8 event. Have to coordinate with
all the readers' schedules, however, and between work schedules, family
obligations, etcetera, the cabash might be put on Mar 8.
I originally had set out most other weekend days in March as alternative
dates, but I had forgotten that reader #4 is in a show with production dates
during many of those days, so the number of available alternatives was cut
in half. I don't really want to do this, but, if push comes to shove, I
might have to seek out another actor as narrator.
In the meantime, after some more tweaking ‐‐ didn't you know there would
be? ‐‐ which included cutting a little bit here, a little bit there, I
have saved a copy of Draft 4B in PDF form. That's my way of saying to myself,
"Maybe you're done, or close to done, with the tweaks of this draft."
This in no way means that the Draft 4B PDF won't possibly be overwritten by
a new edit, but it probably means I'm winding down until after the table
read.
STILL NO VOCAL TRACKS:
I've been battling with just enough of a sore throat that, because of
where in my vocal register I need to sing this song, it's not been a
tenable achievement. It might not hurt if I were to do some mild vocal
warmups every day, which, in all honesty, I ought to be doing, anyway.
PLAYWRIGHT WORK ‐‐
IT'S NOT "THROW IN THE TOWEL" TIME, YET!:
It's been impossible to successfully coordinate the schedules of my
principal readers, at least
for the potential dates in March. I'm not ready to give up on any of them,
as of yet, so, it looks like March is a bust. Now I'm looking at some April
dates. There are some variables for that far off that may be
undetermined at this point, most especially work schedules, but I'm
putting out some April dates.
It was first clear that the narrator
could not make any dates in March that were potential for the other readers,
so I'd decided that I would have to get another narrator. But I do not want
to replace any of those who are reading characters unless it becomes absolutely
necessary. No Sarah Chalke or Dick Sergeant, at this point. No Pete Bests!
And, depending on the date, if we can find a date in April, I may be
able to bring back that narrator.
Naturally, the odds of no tweaks between now and whenever the
table reading happens are
not very good. There have been some tweaks since last post about the play
-- because, you know.....because.
Finally we have arrived at a date and time when all the original
principalreaders
are free and can make it! That would be late morning on Sunday, April 5,
which is six weeks away. That's not as soon as I'd like, but, that's the
way it is. Unfortunately, I could not get back the narrator
I had originally approached for this reading, due to the same scheduling
conflict as before. I am now contemplating others to approach.
My failed text message to Paul, which he never got to read
-- as if there was a likelihood he was going to in any case
Rusty Anderson
Abe Laboriel, Jr.
Brian Ray
Paul Wickens
Hot City Horns
The band's main bass player
The McCartney Freshen Up Tour tote bag (AKA: "Swag Bag")
The McCartney Freshen Up Tour swag poster (AKA: the
"Freshen Up lithograph")
The McCartney Freshen Up Tour swag towel
Front & back of the McCartney Freshen Up Tour
commemorative ticket
The McCartney Freshen Up Tour swag Egyptian Station
coffee cup
The McCartney Freshen Up Tour swag luggage tag
The bad swag hat
The good hat I bought earlier
Here we are again with another extraordinarily past-due recounting of a
little artsy-style
vacation.
Last June 1, I saw
Paul McCartney
in concert for the eleventh time. The first time was forty-three years ago:
Wings
at Riverfront Coliseum
on May 27, 1976, during the
Wings Over America (i.e. the World) Tour.
I was just a few weeks from my eighteenth birthday. It was another fourteen
years before I saw him again. But, then again, it had been fourteen years
since Paul had toured the states. That next time was the big world tour when
Paul finally started playing more than just a small handful of
Beatles
songs. As I've done in the past, here again is my updated Paul
McCartney concert roster:
WINGS OVER AMERICA TOUR - May 27, 1976, Cincinnati, OH (Riverfront Coliseum)
THE PAUL McCARTNEY WORLD TOUR - Feb 12, 1990, Cincinnati, OH (Riverfront Coliseum)
THE NEW WORLD TOUR - MAY 5, 1993, Cincinnati, OH (Riverfront Stadium)
DRIVING USA TOUR - Apr 29, 2002, Cleveland, OH (Gund Arena)
BACK IN THE US TOUR - OCT 10, 2002, Columbus, OH (Jerome Schottenstein Center)
US TOUR - Oct 22, 2005, Columbus, OH (Jerome Schottenstein Center)
ON THE RUN TOUR - AUG 4, 2011, Cincinnati, OH (Great American Ball Park)
OUT THERE! - July 14, 2013, Indianapolis, IN (Bankers Life Fieldhouse)
OUT THERE! - July 9, 2014, Chicago, IL (United Center)
ONE ON ONE - July 10, 2016, Cincinnati, OH (US Bank Arena)
FRESHEN UP - June 1, 2019, Lexington, KY (Rupp Arena)
I drove down to Lexington the day before. I spent the weekend in the
GuestHouse Lexington,
which is less than a fifteen-minute drive away from
Rupp Arena.
And here's what I discovered about Lexington that I had not really fully
realized before: Horses are a big deal in Lexington, Kentucky. I had been
vaguely aware that the town was known as
"The Horse Capital of the World,"
but once you're there, I assure you, your awareness of this becomes anything
but vague. There are paintings and sculptures and statues of horses permeating
the city. It was the comprehensive theme of my hotel. Plus, there are somewhere
in the neighborhood of 400 horse farms in the greater Lexington area.
I contemplated visiting a horse farm over the weekend, but that didn't
come about. Instead, I drove over to the Rupp Arena area about mid-morning,
parked my car, had lunch ‐‐ but for the life of me I cannot now
remember where ‐‐ and visited an art gallery and the childhood home of
Mary Todd Lincoln; the latter two to be discussed later in this entry. I
should have taken some photos of this downtown area because it's really a
beautiful downtown urban space.
As some reading this may know, for my eleventh time to see Sir Paul live,
I decided to splurge and go for the VIP ticket. I went for the second from
top tier, the Hot Sound Package, which after taxes and fees, cost me
$1605.90, to the penny. If I remember correctly, the Front Row Package was
$500 to $1000 more, but I can't remember exactly; I bought the ticket in
September of 2018. What I got for my $1600:
A premium ticket ‐‐ (7th row, just off center)
Priority check-in and entrance
Invitation to Sir Paul McCartney's sound check
Pre-show hospitality reception
Commemorative ticket
Limited edition numbered lithograph
Merchandise item designed and created exclusively for package purchasers
Collectible laminate to remember the evening
Notice one of the perks is an "Invitation to Sir Paul McCartney's sound
check." That would be the gold bounty of the package. The other stuff
was great, especially my seat: Row G (7 rows from the stage), seat
21 (close to the middle), but attendance at the sound check was the
big prize.
Check-in started at 4:00. Guess when I was there. Like I wrote above, I
drove in that morning and parked in the arena parking, which turned out to
be basic public parking that early in the day. As it happens, at Rupp
Arena, if you get down there and park a half a day before an event, you
don't have to pay for parking. So there was twenty bucks from my budget
freed up. After some of the other excursions that are described below, I
got back to the check-in point well before time. I was able to buy a t-shirt
and a coffee mug, then those of us VIP-ers who gathered outside were able to
get in a little before 4:00 and get to the check-in station at the North
Rotunda.
After check-in, where we were given our VIP badge, in its lanyard, we were
led into the banquet hall where we would later be served dinner. There was
an open bar, and on one wall, a large image of Paul for us to stand in front
of for photos. I settled at a table and got to know my fellow Macca fans there.
At one point during the conversation I mentioned that I was an actor from
Dayton, Ohio, and the wife of the couple sitting right next to me asked,
"Were you at the Cincinnati concert in 2016?"
"Yes I was," I answered.
I had stood in line with this couple, Mark and Barb, before that show. I'd
mentioned then that I was an actor from Dayton, Ohio, too.
Wait a minute: is that some sort of pathetic
equivalent to name dropping? ‐‐ "avocation dropping."
We at our table had some lovely conversation, dominated, of course, by the
topics of Sir Paul, the Beatles, other solo members, and shows we've seen.
As well, we all shared about ourselves, who we were, what we did, yadda,
yadda.
A little before 5:00, we were led into the arena to witness the sound check.
There were, I'd say, a few dozen of us. We were positioned standing in the
aisle-way behind the last row of section 1 (which is the white section in the
graph in the right column here). Although if anyone needed to sit, they were
permitted to use the chairs in the first row of section 2, which we stood
in front of. Mark, of Mark & Barb, who was in line pretty far in front
of me, came and got me to take a good spot in the front of the group, which
he had saved for me. So, Mark's a good guy!!!
On the big screens on stage was a pic of Paul playing his bass, and under it
was the message: "Text me," and a local number for the text message.
I attempted to do so, but, I got an error message, even after several attempts.
Don't know what the problem was; maybe it was my carrier. To be honest, I
wasn't terribly confident that Paul was going to see those messages, anyway.
The band shortly came out. They did a ritual group hug, situated themselves,
then Paul came to his center mic and said, "Welcome to sound check."
And then he went on to tout the fact that the
Liverpool Football Club,
his hometown soccer team, had just, not much earlier that very day, won
the 2019 Champions League final,
"Europe's biggest prize." He would repeat the boast at the
concert proper in a few hours. I'm betting he mentioned at a few subsequent
stops on the tour, as well.
The band was the same tour band that's been playing with Paul since 2002.
They are on the majority of the recorded work since
Driving Rain.
Technically, they've played with Paul longer than John, George or Ringo
did.
Here's the Freshen Up Tour band lineup:
Rusty Anderson
Backing vocals, electric guitar, acoustic guitar
Brian Ray
Backing vocals, electric guitar, acoustic guitar, bass
Paul Wickens
Backing vocals, keyboards, electric guitar, acoustic guitar, bongos,
percussion, harmonica, accordion
The Hot City Horns
Mike Davis (trumpet), Paul Burton (trombone) and Kenji Fenton (sax)
AND
Sir Paul McCartney
Lead vocals, bass, acoustic guitar, piano, electric guitar, ukulele,
mandolin
There were no song fragments played. They did only complete songs, only one
that would show up in the concert lineup. In the past I have heard Paul run
just a section of a song during a sound check, when I've been at a venue early
enough to hear the sound check from outside of the arena. Clearly that's been
when something in performance or tech has been giving them a problem they
needed to work out. I have no doubt had there been a need, we would have
witnessed the playing of a trouble spot of a song.
The band opened by playing a bluesy jazz piece where each musician,
including each horn player, got a few bars for some solo work. Paul sang
toward the end of the piece, which turned out to be a bluesy country song
titled, "Lucky in Kentucky." The function clearly was to get a
good intitial sound level on everyone's instrument.
The sound check "show" was about 35-40 minutes. Of course, I
noticed that as it progressed, the sound mix and clarity got progressively
better. You know, 'cause it was a sound check.
A great little Paul moment happened maybe ten, fifteen minutes in, when he
took off his jacket and quite a few of the women in the sound check audience
wooed at him. Which has happened at every one of his concerts I've been to
for a long while. At sound check he came to the mic and said, "What is
it with that jacket off thing? Are you all excited by what kind of shirt I'm
wearing?" Then he sang an a cappella bar or two from the chorus of Rod
Stewart's "Do Ya Think I'm Sexy?"
He definitely paid attention to the fact that we were there, and spoke to
us as an audience seeing a show; after all, that is what we were. The set
was a mix of old rock songs he likes, some that he's recorded at one time
or another, as well as a couple Beatle songs and some things from his
post-Beatle career, some quite recent. He ended the set with "Lady
Madonna," the only song to reappear later that night.
The sound check set list:
Lucky in Kentucky
Honey Don't
Hi Ho Silver
Drive My Car
I Don't Know
C Moon
It's So Easy to Fall in Love
San Francisco Bay
Singing the Blues
Midnight Special
New
Lady Madonna
After "Lady Madonna," Paul looked back to the tech station behind
us and asked his sound engineer, he said the name but I don't remember
it, "Did you get what you need?" Then he put his thumb up,
and then said to us, "See you at the show," and he and his
compatriots exited back stage as we were ushered back to the banquet hall
where we were served a respectable banquet. Not too surprising to me, it
was vegetarian. The stuffed peppers were especially good. I wonder if the
food was from Linda McCartneyvegetarian recipes
-- perhaps not probable, but not at all impossible.
We also, toward the end of dinner, got our swag bags. Now, this would not
be a swag bag of the calibre of the
Oscar swag,
and I would not guess that much of the $1600 I paid covered the expense of
this Macca swag.
The bag itself ‐‐ a pretty nice tote bag, with some zippered
compartments
The Freshen Up lithograph
The commemorative ticket
An Egyptian Station coffee cup
A monogrammed towel
A Macca luggage tag
A Macca cap, but it wasn't the style of cap that I like.
Fortunately the merchandizers did have the style I like
Now, I gotta tell ya, Row G, seat 21 at a Paul McCartney concert is a nice
place to be. We can debate whether the ticket price was too stiff, and I'm
probably not going to be able to do a good job, at all, defending the cost.
But, I paid it. I'm not sure whether you could get a ticket that close at
a lower price, sans the sound check, etc. One might have been able to do
so, I can't say for sure. Regardless, it's the closest I've been to the man
in all my times seeing him. I was front row once for
Ringo,
and at one point was something like five feet away from him ‐‐ so there is
that.
That seat, plus the rest of the Hot Sound Package, overcame the fact that
the overwhelming amount of the concert repertoire consisted of songs I have
seen him do live a lot. He makes set lists for the fans who are there for
the first time, there's no doubt, and it's not a philosophy I can argue
with. But, the set list I'd love is not one that will ever be a reality.
That set would just not have enough of a universal appeal for Paul to ever
consider. On this tour's set list, the only new songs to me, live, were the
things off his latest album,
Egypt Station:
"Who Cares," "Come on to Me," and "Fuh You."
The Freshen Up concert set list for the Lexington show:
A Hard Day's Night
Junior's Farm
Can't Buy Me Love
Letting Go
Who Cares
Got to Get You Into My Life
Come on to Me
Let Me Roll It/Purple Haze Jam
I've Got a Feeling
Let 'Em In
My Valentine
Nineteen Hundred and Eighty-Five
Maybe I'm Amazed
*ACOUSTIC SET
I've Just Seen a Face
In Spite of All the Danger
From Me to You
Dance Tonight ‐‐ (Paul on mandolin)
Love Me Do
Blackbird ‐‐ (raised stage)
Here Today ‐‐ (raised stage)
Queenie Eye
Lady Madonna
Eleanor Rigby
Fuh You
Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite!
Something ‐‐ (Paul on solo ukelele then acoustic guitar with the band)
Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da
Band on the Run
Back in the U.S.S.R.
Let It Be
Live and Let Die
Hey Jude
ENCORE:
Birthday
Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Reprise)
Helter Skelter
2ND ENCORE:
Golden Slumbers
Carry That Weight
The End
Please don't misunderstand, it was a great show and I enjoyed myself
immensely, even beyond the VIP package and the seventh-row seat, and
despite it not really being a new show for me. Bottom line: Sir Paul is a
great showman! His stage presence and command of the audience is a
masterclass to watch and experience. The man has an instinct for report
with the audience. Also, his musicianship seems so incidental to the event
that its import to the evening is like a stealth element. It's not a focus,
whatsoever, yet, the show would be greatly diminished without it.
That band is top-notch, too. All four are on their game. But, I have to
say, one of the big joys of a Paul McCartney concert is watching Abe
Laboriel play his drum kit. That dude just has a frickin' great time He's
almost doing ballett up there. It's visual poetry.
One of the questions I have gotten the last several times I've seen Paul
live is, how is his voice? Sometimes it's just a general question
because Paul is in his seventies; sometimes it's from someone who saw him
live in the near past. How's Paul's voice? I occasionally see comments on
fan threads that say such things as: His voice is as good as ever!
Sorry, but, no. It's lovely fan loyalty, but these people are hearing with
a biased filter. Paul's voice isn't what it used to be, there's just no way
around that. The man will be 78 years old this coming June, he doesn't have
the voice of a 25-year-old anymore.
Beyond that, I have never gotten the sense that Paul has given his voice
immaculate care. I was very happy to see him drink water during the show in
Lexington. The three previous shows, Indianpolis in 2013, Chicago in 2014,
and Cincinnati in 2016, he did not once take even a sip of water, or any
other beverage, during the whole time he was on stage. That's simply not
healthy for the vocal mechanism. I've seen several anecdotal accounts of
him dismissing or ignoring vocal health advice, too. Granted, those were
anecdotes, and I can't even cite one of them right now. But there's been
more than one of them, and I have heard the measured degradation of his
voice over the past thirty years. And, again, some of it is just that in
1990 he turned 48, and in 2020 he turns 78. But, some of it is vocal health
care, or lack thereof, in my opinion.
I also wish he'd drop the key of a few songs. He could sing them better and
it would wreak less havoc on his voice. Let's face it, "Maybe I'm
Amazed" was a challenging wail when he recorded it in his late
twenties, now days, it just is a major shredder for him. A step or a
step-and-a-half down would be a good thing.
Yet, again, I have to go back to, despite this particular observation, and,
frankly, concern, Paul is still awesome in concert. He puts on one hell of
a show. I would not say at all that I'm done going to see him live ‐‐
providing there's at least some change-up in the show repertoire. I
think we can pretty much be assured that "Live and Let Die" and
"Hey Jude" will be the last two songs of the main show ‐‐ that's
been the norm for the last several tours. It's also highly likely that the
"Golden Slumbers/Carry That Weight/The End" medley will end the
second encore ‐‐ again, the norm for a while. But Paul, you have an amazing
canon to pull from, and a lot of pretty popular rockers (and ballads)
from Beatles, Wings, and solo that we'd all love to hear live, but haven't.
So.....
Well, anyway, below is one of perhaps several dozen different configurations
of a playlist for a Paul show that I'd like to see, all those configurations
with maybe half the songs being different than any other configuration. This
one is what I came up with this time, based on my caprice for the day. There
are quite a few deep cuts here that only true Macca fans will know, so, this
is pure fantasy. There will never be a playlist resembling this, save for
the obligatory songs that, you know, really kind of have to be there.
You'll note I ended the main show and the last encore in perfect alignment
with what Paul actually does.
One Capricious Version of My Wishlist McCartney Concert Playlist
Possibilities:
Stranglehold#
That Was Me#
Helen Wheels#
Rough Ride (at the original tempo, not the slower tempo
from the 89/90 tour)
Take It Away#
Band on the Run
Appreciate#
Fine Line
Get On the Right Thing#
Winedark Open Sea#
Arrow Through Me#
About You#
She's Given Up Talking#
*ACOUSTIC SET
Little Lamb, Dragonfly#
Great Day# ‐‐ (raised stage)
Here Today ‐‐ (raised stage)
Something ‐‐ (Paul on solo ukelele then acoustic guitar with the band)
3 Legs#
Come On to Me
Talk More Talk#
Summer's Day Song#
Heaven on a Sunday#
Magic#
The Pound is Sinking#
Cafe on the Left Bank#
I Can Bet#
Monkberry Moon Delight#
Let It Be
That Day is Done
Live and Let Die
Hey Jude
ENCORE:
Maybe I'm Amazed
Get Back
2ND ENCORE:
Golden Slumbers
Carry That Weight
The End
Cue the "Where's
(insert title here)?"
comments.
The songs with the (#) symbol are ones I have never seen him do live. Most
of those, I don't think he has ever done live.
Dinner late Friday evening, walking distance from
the hotel, after settling into my room.
With Lexington only being a two-and-a-half-hour drive from my humble little
abode, I could have simply driven down on Saturday, then either spent just
one night or driven back home after the show. I didn't much like either of
those options. It was first, that I didn't want to be in a potential rush
to get to my VIP pre-show in time, and then make the two-and-a-half-hour
drive back home after the show. So two nights in a hotel was the attractive
option just on those points. I also saw this as an opportunity for a
mini-vacation.
I knew there would be some other things to drop into the weekend down
there.
For past mini-vacations,
I have planned a little bit farther ahead. This time the only thing I was
set on, ahead of time, was visting an art museum. I did google the area
around Rupp Arena
for a museum or a gallery and came up with one within walking distance,
that distance being a goal. But other than that, I left my morning and early
afternoon, and possibly my Friday evening after arriving, open to the caprice
that would hit at the time. Though I do remember that while planning the
trip I might have looked for a theatre production, that might have been up
in Lexington, to attend on Friday evening, and didn't have success finding
one.
Whatever extras, beyond Macca, that I was doing, it would have to be Friday
evening or Saturday morning & early afternoon, because I was currently
in rehearsal,
as The Narrator,
in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance
at The Guild,
and I had to make it back to Dayton for
Tech Sunday,
which was that weekend. I'd scheduled the trip, including the two-night
stay, before I'd even decided to audition, and was upfront with the director
before auditions about the possibility I'd be late for Tech Sunday
rehearsal.
As I wrote above, I drove over to the arena about mid-morning on Saturday
-- (no Friday night event) ‐‐ and found the arean parking open; thus I
ended up circumventing the $20 event parking fee through a legitimate
technicality. I admit, I expected to possibly be stopped after the show,
as I left, for the fee, but that did not happen. Once parked I walked around
the area checking it out. Again, as I wrote above, I know I stopped somewhere
to get brunch, but I still cannot remember where; I don't even remember
what sort of food; and I must have paid cash because there was no charge on
a card to help refresh my memory.
I, of course, checked out the entrance at the arena where I was to report
for my VIP event later in the afternoon. Then I went searching for where
the Macca tractor trailers and tour busses were parked. Then I just walked
the urban area around the arena, which is close to
The University of Kentucky (UK),
whose Kentucky Wildcats
play their home games at Rupp. That area of the city is really attractive
and happening. Why I didn't take photos of the area is beyond me. The place
was certainly photographable. Eventually, I made it to the art gallery I had
found on-line a few days before.
The art gallery I visited was
New Editions Gallery,
on West Short Street, not even a ten-minute walk from Rupp Arena. It's a
small gallery but there was interesting work on its walls, mostly, if not
exclusively, at that time, from current and past art majors. Below are the
four pieces that I was most enamored with, all of them, by the way, were
for sale; I would assume by now sales have been made. Had I had the money,
it's not unthinkable one would have gone home with me.
Connect the Dots ‐‐ oil on luan ‐‐
Stephanie McNeill,
Morehead State University
Did You Hear That? ‐‐ oil on panel ‐‐
Kaitlyn Steward,
Murray State University
Vulgar ‐‐ oil ‐‐
Samantha Neal,
Morehead State University
Post Picking Up the Pieces ‐‐ wood sculpture
-- Paige Stamper,
Morehead State University
Earlier in the day, when I was on my customary search for the Macca tour
busses and trucks, I stumbled upon the
Mary Todd Lincoln House,
which is maybe a five-minute walk from Rupp Arena, and sets just outside
the arena complex's back premises, close to the corner of West Main and
Tucker Street. I had spied the tour vehicles inside a fenced area a little
south of this historical site. Then I came upon this historical site.
This was the kiss of the angel of caprice. I loved the idea that while on
a trip to see one of the most famous icons of rock and roll, I would take
in the childhood family home of the wife of a premier American president.
I don't know that I think "irony" well describes it, but there is
a wonderful, odd juxtaposition that I find delicious.
When I went in to check it out, I found that there were small tours that
were led by docents, and that at that moment all the tours were sold out.
But, there was an "extra" tour planned for a little later, in the
early afternoon, that I could get a place in. This, as it turned out, had
been an unusually busy day for the house; there were a couple extra tours
added. I bought my ticket for later, and then I believe this is when I went
to have the brunch, or lunch, of which I cannot remember the details.
There were about eight to twelve of us on the tour. We were, of course,
given a lot of color, background and interesting information, most of
which I couldn't tell you now if my life depended on it. A few things I do
remember, though be advised, I'm reporting this from memory and not doing
any on-line research to be sure I'm remembering correctly:
Some of the furniture is original. Other pieces were procured to
match as closely as possible what could not be preserved
Some furniture and other household items are not absolutely known
to have been in the Todd home, but, based on informed speculation, are
likely a part of the house due to the Todd socio-economic standing
The same goes for much of the wall paper and carpets/rugs. Those
restoring the house researched what was common for a household like the
Todds in the era and location
Both the Todds and the Lincolns had family members on both sides
of the civil war
Mary Todd, in fact, had a sister who was married to a Confederate
officer, and the two sisters were estranged for the rest of their lives
Going back to how busy the historical house had been that day: at some point
early in the tour, our docent asked, "How many of you are going to the
Paul McCartney show tonight?" I don't remember if everyone raised
their hands, but most did. Our docent smiled, then he said, "Almost
every one today and yesterday have been in town for the show."'
Following are pictures of the home and the backyard garden. I'm not going
to even attempt to write captions about what is what. Some is
self-explanatory; others, I just don't remember the details.
Click on the picture for an
Easter egg
of a sort....
I make no assumption that I will not be seeing Sir Paul in concert again.
It's highly likely there will be a Number Twelve. I hope there's another
mini-vacation
surrounding the show.
I don't yet have that fourth reader,
the narrator, for the April 5th
closed table read of my
play manuscript. A couple of actors have come to mind but I have yet to
approach either one. Meanwhile, the inevitable, compulsory, almost
mandatory tweaks continue. But I consider these simply little improvements.
A couple are just simple copy editing, where I have finally been able to
see a missing word, usually a gramatical article such as "an" or
"the," or the detection of a malapropism like "the"
for "that" or "your" for "you're," for
example. Also by the small act of changing a word here and there I'm making
the dialogue stronger.
But I am impatient for April 5 to role around!
OPC/DRAMATISTS GUILD PLAYWRITING WORKSHOP:
This afternoon is the one-day playwriting workshop, I'm attending, that OPC
is holding in conjunction with the
Dramatist Guild of America.
It's hosted by The Human Race Theatre Company,
and is billed as "A Playwriting Workshop and Producer's Q & A."
It's 4:00-6:00 pm, at The Metropolitan Arts Center in the Human Race
Theatre Company 2nd Floor Studio, 126 N Main St, Dayton, OH 45402.
At 4:00 will be a presentation titled, "Reworking for the Stage:
Adaptation and Revision."
"This talk is all about making progress on whatever project is
currently keeping you up at night. Whether you're daunted by the task
of adapting an existing work for the stage, stuck on the draft between
drafts of one of your plays, or maybe both, this talk is for you.
Jeremy Llorence, Otterbein
University's playwriting professor, will share personal stories of his
creative approaches in adaptation, revision, and the rehearsal process,
while providing some of his tools and exercises for taking that net big
creative step."
At 5:00, it will be "A Producer's Perspective: Q and A with Cleveland
Public Theatre's, Beth Wood."
"How do you get your foot in the door with a new theater? What are
producers looking for? In what ways are the national conversations about
new work changing? What's next? Join
Beth Wood,
Associate Artistic Director of
Cleveland Public Theatre, as
she shares her impressions and reflections on over a decade producing
new work.
Les Hunter,
Ohio Regional Representative of the Dramatists Guild of America, will
moderate this session."
There were two presentations. The first was titled, "Reworking for the
Stage: Adaptation and Revision," and was presented by
Jeremy Llorence, the playwriting
professor at Otterbein University.
Prof. Llorence talked about what an adaptation is and how it differs from
a remaking or an updating of a previous work. He also spoke about revision
of one's own work, in general, whether it is an adaptation or a completely
new, original work. The latter was of more interest to me, at least for
any time in the near future.
For Revision, one of the things Llorence talk about was the difference
between "small order concerns" and "large order concerns."
The difference should be pretty self-explanatory. Small order concerns
are the sort of tweaks I've been doing on my manuscript here recently:
choosing a better or correct word, adding clearly missing words, rephrasing
a line so it feels more like how the particular character would say it.
The large order concerns are such things as how the second part of my
Act 2 wasn't working and didn't lead well into the ending I had and wanted
to keep. Thus I had to totally rewrite that section, replacing what was
there with new content that is a much stronger path to that same ending,
which is now well earned.
In terms of those large order concerns, Llorence talked about understanding
the difference between symptoms and causes. When someone tells you that a
section of your play drags, that is a symptom. The cause will be something
such as there is no action that is moving the story along, or the stakes
don't seem to be high enough for the characters, or the conflict is weak
or vague.
He brought up some questions we could ask ourselves and I found two of those
questions most compelling:
Has a character made a decision and can we either make the action
of that decision more forceful or put up bigger obstacles?
What's the character afraid of and, to create tension, if it makes
sense, can we present him/her with what she/he fears?
He also gave us his personal "Hierarchy of Feedback," the order
in which he puts weight on the overall credibility of the positive and
negative responses to his work. It's a ranking that makes sense to me:
Those involved with a workshopping of a production of his work ‐‐
the director, the actors, perhaps the producers
Industry audiences ‐‐ fellow playwrights, producers, directors,
actors, artistic directors of theatres, etc., etc.
General theatre audiences ‐‐ those who attend theatre on a regular
basis, have an affinity for the craft, who have some understanding and
knowledge of theatre and playscripts, even if only from the POV of the
audience seats.
Most friends and family ‐‐ especially those outside of the theatre
world. Of course, such are prone toward favorable biases and exaggerating
their praise.
I would add that even close friends and family who are
theatre colleagues may sometimes shy away from totally honest
criticism, but they are less likely to unduly praise something.
The second presentation was "A Producer's Perspective: Q and A with
Cleveland Public Theatre's, Beth Wood."
Les Hunter,
the Ohio Regional Representative of the Dramatists Guild of America was to
moderate this session, but he could not be there, so OPC Founder and Director,
Michael London stepped
in. Ms. Wood,
the Associate Artistic Director of the Cleveland Public Theatre,
spoke in length about her own theatre in terms of what they are looking
for in new plays, the process of submitting to them, how they choose what
they choose, and her own approach, as director, to mounting a new play.
The salient point, regardless of what theatre is in question, is to know
what the theatre produces and what the theatre's mission is. As both she
and Michael emphasized: look at the theatre's current and recent past
season of plays and ask yourself if your play would fit in to one of those
seasons. If not, it may not be a good choice to submit your play.
Two items of particular interest to me were the suggestions to:
Become a member of the
Dramatist Guild of America.
At this point, I could not become a full member, as I have not had a
play performed in front of a paying audience or had it published by an
established/known publishing/licensing house, such as
Dramatists Play Service.
I am eligible to become an associate member since I have
written a completed script. The bullet list at the DGA website of the
perks for an associate member has some good stuff on it:
Review of unsigned contracts
Business advice and access to our Business Affairs Department
Free or discounted ticket offers
Special discounts
A searchable listing in the Member Directory on our website
This is probably going to happen. When I do it, that means I'm
committing myself to those other plays that are in me.
Submit my new original play script to
NPX: the New Play Exchange.
I was at first on the fence about this one, but am leaning toward it
more and more. I've pretty much contacted every playwright I know, as
well as a few other industry people, for their personal pros and cons
about the service. A few have already responded with either positive or
neutral stances; thus far there's been nothing in the cons column.I've
done a bit of on-line research for opinions on NPX and have run across
a few article, etc., on it. These two are typical of the overall
positive reviews it's getting:
The on-line stuff I've found is all a few years old, but the feedback
I'm getting from theatre colleagues is current. At the moment, of
course, I'm still in the closed table read
stage with my manuscript. but, when it feels ready, I am seriously
considering this step.
So, I'd say the two hours I spent in the workshop was well worth the time.
Monday and last night I was one of those who auditioned for
It's Only a Play,
by Terrence McNally,
which is up at Beavercreek Community Theatre
starting April 24. This is one of those times when I don't have to write,
"And it's on to the next audition." I have been cast in one of
the two roles that I went in shooting for. It's not the plumb of the two,
but it's still a good role. I will portray Ira Drew, a New York theatre
critic who has a rather vicious pen. There might be something else about
him, too. You'd have to come see the show to find that out. I'm glad to
say I got the role because one of the few times I read for Ira I stumbled
all over one paragraph-long line pretty badly. I wanted to re-do that
scene, and had director Debra Kent asked if anyone had anything they
wanted to read, I would have requested such. But, apparently it didn't
matter.
I was also read for James Wicker, the more plumb role that I had my eyes on.
I did a decent read, but I was pretty sure that actor Jim Walker would get
the role; he's pretty typed in for
it, and I was not the least bit surprised when I saw his name in that role
on the cast list. I was also read for the role of the playwright, Peter
Austin, and I felt good about that audition, too, especially about my
reading of his monologue, but that
role has gone to
Saul Caplan.
The Cast of It's Only a Play
(in order of appearance)
CHARACTER
ACTOR
Gus P. Head
Maxwell Shafer
James Wicker
Jim Walker
Virginia Noyes
Lynn Vanderpool
Frank Finger
Brandon Shockney
Julia Budder
Melissa Ertsgaard
Ira Drew
K.L.Storer
Peter Austin
Saul Caplan
I've shared the stage several times with Saul, a couple of those time,
professionally; Saul has also directed me several times. I've shared the
stage once with Mr. Walker, last June in
The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance
at The Guild. I've also
shared the stage with both women in the cast. Melissa Ertsgaard and I did
A Case of Libel,
again at The Guild, along with Saul as a castmate. Lynn Vanderpool and I
had the leads in A Woman on the Cusp, by
Carl L. Williams,
one of the six finalist plays at FutureFest 2011.
I've also worked in shows with all those actors where I was not a castmate
but rather on the production staff, sometimes as producer, usually as sound
designer. However, Maxwell Shafer and Brandon Shockney I have not worked with
before at all.
Of course, I had already reported a couple weeks ago that I had signed on
to design sound for the show. This will be the first time that I've done a
sound gig at BCT.
More on NPX: the New Play Exchange
-- Since the last post, I've heard back from several more playwrights, none
positing anything negative, A couple of them have not yet availed themselves
of the service, yet, reported that they new a lot playwrights who have, and
all those playwrights gave good reviews. It seems crystal clear that NPX
will be a go when the manuscript is ready for that step.
Speaking of the Manuscript ‐‐ Here's some par for the
course, (or as my mother used to say,
"power for the course"). Last night I re-wrote
some lines and I'm probably not done doing that. I had considered adding a
couple lines but decided they weren't needed, after all. I think I can
pretty much guarantee there will be tweaking one sort or another until the
April 5th closed reading is
close enough that the actors need a copy. And there might be some tweaks
between then and the reading. There was last time.
Idea for a New Play ‐‐ Also yesterday, I got an idea
for a new play. I've jotted down some bullet points. I have a
vague-to-half-formed idea of the general setting and situation and a nice
idea for the driving conflict. Who knows when there will be a
Final Draft document began for
this one, but, at least there is a beginning.
Remember I wrote that "When I [join DGA],
that means I'm committing myself to those other plays that are in me."
Documenting an idea for a new play that has come to me just seems to make
sense. If I'm going to put myself in the position to be called a
playwright, then I have take
the actions of one; this is one of those actions, I would say.
AND STILL NO VOCAL TRACKS:
My throat has still not been in good enough shape to lay down the vocal
tracks for the new little rocker. I am on the mend, however, so this
weekend might just see some progress.
I have officially invited a select number of people to the
closed reading on April 5.
Only a few have thus far responded. I'm skeptical about a particular few
accepting, mostly due to their heavy schedules, but wanted to at least give
them the right of refusal.
In the meantime the tweaking, (the little revisions,
occasional small cuts, and occasional small additions), continues.
AND SO IT BEGINS:
Tonight is our first rehearsal,
the table reading, originally
scheduled for last night but moved because an actor had a scheduling conflict.
Beyond that, yesterday during my lunch break, I began the process of making
my flashcards, using standard index cards, so I can drill myself on my lines,
on demand, in that actor's necessary goal of getting
off-book.
HOW I SPENT MY MONDAY LUNCH AT
THE RENT-PAYER:
Me in the break room at work, where I started creating the
index flashcards to help me get my lines embedded in my
brain toward the goal of getting off-book
I also need to create some flashcards for the U.D. Law gig I have
coming up on March 30. It's a scenarion (a case) that I've done a few times
in the past, including last year. But, I do need to refresh my memory. It
would have been nice had I saved the flashcards from the past, but, I have
looked for them and I don't believe I did. This time I won't toss them!
BATTING ZERO ON THE DIALOGUE CLEARANCE THIS SEASON:
No clearance has been granted to use dialogue in the promocast
for Morning's at Seven,
so I have asked photographer, and friend of DTG,
Gregory Brugger
to come in to shoot some stills of the
dress rehearsal next Monday,
and I'll edit the DV movie to final cut
next Tuesday. Mr. Brugger has graciously volunteered his valuable profesional
services.
Yes, there's been more tweaking. The paragraph above is probably a bit of
an exaggeration, but, still, there's been more tweaking.
Also, in light of the declared pandemic of the COVID-19 coronavirus, I have
not yet decided to cancel or postpone the April 5
closed reading. The
health threat is clearly expected to accelerate, and depending on how much,
I might have to postpone the reading. That would be frustrating, but, you
know: it'll be what it will be.
We are now officially in rehearsal.
The table reading was Tuesday
night. There was a rehearsal last night, but I was not
called for rehearsal. I was
called for costume measurements, but I was in and out in a few minutes,
then went home and worked on the tweaks I wrote of above in the Playwright
work entry. Monday, I am called for blocking.
I've signed up to be a reader for
the current Ohio Playwrights Circle
workshop. This one runs a little longer. I've scheduled myself for eight
sessions, starting this Saturday. Although I may have to cancel the March
21 session, because I have a DTG
board meeting. There are two separate readings that happen at each workshop
session, one in the morning and one in the early afternoon. I may only miss
the morning readings on the 21st, or they may may want me to bow out for
the whole day.
The Dayton Theatre Guild is actively following the news along with
County, State, and Federal government recommendations with regards
to the coronavirus (COVID-19). As a public venue we are acutely
aware of the elevated risk of public gatherings. At this time we
intend on presenting all performances as scheduled. While we are
taking the extra precaution of extra cleaning we need to ask for
your help as well.
Morning's at Seven by Paul Osborn opens a week from this
Friday (March 20, 2020). We ask that if you are showing any
symptoms or have been exposed to someone showing symptoms of the
coronavirus (COVID-19) or any other illness, we ask you to postpone
your attendance to a later performance in the run. The production
runs for three weekends (March 20 - April 5, 2020). If you're
unable to attend Morning's at Seven by Paul Osborn due to
illness, we will gladly change your tickets to a future performance
this season. Simply call us at 937-278-5993 and leave a message as
to the date of your current tickets and the new date you wish to
attend and we will do our best to accommodate your request.
If at a later time the situation changes and we need to adjust or
cancel performances, we will post information to our website as well
as send out an email to those on our mailing list and/or reach out
to those without email addresses. We thank you in advance for your
cooperation.
Of course, just like the rest of you, like everyone in my state of Ohio, in
our nation, in the world, the COVID-19 pandemic is disrupting, to one extent
or another, pretty much everything in my life. All Ohio K-12 schools, public
and private, are shut down as of end of the school day this coming Monday,
until at least April 6. Wright State University,
where my rent-payer is, has
suspended all in-person course work until at least March 30. All course
work will be on-line as of Monday. I spoke to a prof in the theatre
department and asked how were things like movement classes going to work.
His response was, "I don't now. It's a challenge." All official
Wright State U. events and student activities are suspended "until
further notice." None of these particular suspensions affect me to
any extent, except that the campus gym is close "until further notice,"
which was no surprise and makes great sense since a gym is a high-risk place
for the spread of communicable diseases. So, now I'm wishing I had some
workout equipment beyond a few bar bells at the homestead.
Ohio Governor, Mike DeWine
declared the three-week closure of K-12 schools Thursday afternoon in a
press conference where he also announced the prohibition of public gatherings
of 100 or more people without a definitive target enddate. This, of course,
affects my personal theatre world. I wouldn't guess this isn't a state-wide,
soon-to-be nationwide situation, but most theatre productions in the Dayton
area are either completely canceled or have been postponed until April,
sometimes later, or "to a date to be announced." You'll see below
that my home theatre, The Dayton Theatre Guild
is delaying the opening of our next show,
Morning's at Seven
for at least two weeks ‐‐ exact dates not yet determined.
We're all being hit with some inconveniences, at best, and some people are
being hit with some serious hardships. Right now, I can't really think of
any hardships I'm being hit with, but, you know, things have been changing
in pretty quick cycles the last few days, so I guess I'll see what the near,
or not-too distant, future holds for me. I guess we'll all see what that
near future holds for us, collectively
The multitude of sports events and conferences being canceled or delayed,
the concert tours, Broadway: the service industries are certainly going to
a major hit, not to mention a lot of those directly connected with these
functions ‐‐ I think specifically of the actors, production crews, and
theatre staffs, some who may get compensation during the suspensions, most
who will not.
I guess we all need to brace for the next few weeks, or longer. And the
long-term financial and economic ramifications of this, not just domestically,
but globally, who knows what those will be. It all drops back to:
Be concerned but don't panic
Follow the guidlines of health experts
Don't do those things we've been told put the at-risk population
in danger
And wash your hands....a lot
As for all those out there who think all these actions being taken by
governmental bodies, schools, and businesses are unnecessary and that this
whole COVID-19 stuff is overblown, that people are over-reacting, well I
just gotta say this: I'm over sixty; I have high blood pressure; I had
a massive heart attack a little over four years ago and had major heart
surgery ‐‐ a quadruple bypass. According to actual medical professionals,
the CDC, and the
WHO, I am in that at-risk population who
can die if I contract COVID-19, for which there is no vaccine and no cure
at the present time. So, you know what, think what you want to think about
it being over-blown, but I am way okay with the "over-reacting."
Still, at this point, I am planning on still having the
closed table reading on
Sunday, April 5. Again, this will be contingent on nothing happening in
connection with COVID-19 the persuades me it's not a good idea. Of course,
also a fctor will be the comfort levels and willingness of my
readers and invited guests, but
especially the readers.
Also at this point,
It's Only a Play
is still in rehearsal and the
production dates, Apr 24-May 3, 2020, have not changed. Monday, I am still
called for blocking.
The Ohio Playwrights Circle
workshop, which as of this morning, I was to be a
reader for, has been canceled. It
was going to run into a problem, anyway, because the
Dayton Metro Library,
which was where the workshop was to be held, has "closed until further
notice."
Shortly this morning there will be a special meeting of the board of
directors at The Guild to
decide the exact dates of
Morning's at Seven.
The updated DTG statement below elaborates.
UPDATED DAYTON THEATRE GUILD STATEMENT CONCERNING THE CORONAVIRUS
(COVID-19)
March 12, 2020 update
The Dayton Theatre Guild is actively following the news along with County,
State, and Federal government recommendations with regards to the
coronavirus (COVID-19). As a public venue we are acutely aware of the
elevated risk of public gatherings. As of this afternoon, the State of
Ohio mandated that any public gatherings with 100 or more people be
prohibited. While we are a small venue and could limit ticket sales,
we also need to consider the health of our cast, crew, as well as our
patrons.
To that end, Morning's at Seven by Paul Osborn
will NOT OPEN on Friday (March 20, 2020).
We are currently working with the cast, crew, and the company that owns
the rights to the show to determine our options of postponing opening
night and what duration of a run can be accommodated by all. We have
suspended all ticket sales for the show at the present time. We
anticipate an answer by Monday, March 16, 2020. At that time we will
update our website. We will also be sending an email and broadcast
message via telephone once we have the answers.
We will continue to monitor the situation and follow County, State,
and Federal recommendations. If the situation changes, we will adjust
or cancel performances as necessary and inform our patrons via our
website, email, and/or broadcast telephone message. As always, our
greatest concern is the health and well being of our cast, crew, and
patrons. If you are sick, we wish you a quick and full recovery. If
you healthy, we wish you continued good health.
Thank you for your continued patronage.
Dayton Theatre Guild
Most theatre productions in the state have been canceled ‐‐ Broadway, too,
if you're keeping score. This weekend I was planning to see
The Man Who Came to Dinner
at Dayton Playhouse, but it
has been canceled. I was also planning to see
Proof
at Troy Civic Theatre,
which is going on as scheduled (it's a small theatre with maybe two-dozen
seats, or so), but I am not going to be able to make it do to other
obligations. Jennifer Joplin's
superb one-woman show, which she authored, The Milf Also Rises, has
een postponed until early May, so I called the box office to change my
ticket for that HRTC extra.
With the Wright State gym being closed,
I have to figure out how to get my exercise in. My cardiologist wants me to
get at least two sessions of rigorous exercise a week, and he'd prefer it
was three or four.
As I said above, I wish I had some workout equipment beyond a few bar bells
at home. An elliptical machine would be awesome. A resistance training
machine, a Bowflex, or whatever, would be nice, too. Hell, even a bench
press would do. Well, I do have the free-weight barbells, and a few other
things. Guess it'll be those and a lot of hiking ‐‐ and really, I'm a big
fan of hiking, so, there is that.
Well, isn't life in the COVID-19 world in a constant flux of change? Things
are rapidly changing in this pandemic situation. Sunday,
Ohio Governor, Mike DeWine
ordered all dine-in restaurant services closed as of 9:00 pm that evening.
It's looking like there's a strong possibility Ohio public schools will be
closed for the rest of the year, and DeWine has warned parents to be prepared
for daycare centers to be closed. At Wright State University,
distance learning (on-line) for all classes has been extended until the
end of the semester. Wright State is, of course, where my rent-payer job,
at the Paul Laurence Dunbar Library
is. As of today, I was supposed to be one of a few staff members working remotely
from home, since I am in the higher-risk population. But the university has
closed down the library, as of today, so I am one of many library staff
members working remotely from home.
This was supposed to be primary election day in Ohio. The Governor wanted
to postpone the in-person ballot day until June, and extend absentee ballots
almost up to the day. He could not make that decree himself so he arranged
for a law suit, Monday. The judge that heard the case denied the motion.
So, last night, the governor decreed that the poles will be closed today
as a health hazard. I did not vote early. I planned to vote today. Now,
there is a chance that I will not be able to vote in this election. Supposedly
the Secretary of State will use the courts to extend voting options to give
those of us who haven't voted yet the opportunity. It'll probably work,
but what if it doesn't?
Below are updates for much of what I wrote of in my last post. Obviously,
any of these could changed from their current statuses to
CANCELED in a heart
beat.
AS OF RIGHT NOW ‐‐ I still have plans for the
closed table reading on
Sunday, April 5, I have not canceled or postponed. I will be
taking certain precautions, however.
I will be setting the room up so everyone can be at a safe distance from
each other. I'll wipe down the tables and chairs before everyone arrives.
There will be no refreshments provided ‐‐ it'll be a BYO situation (including
water). I do have ring binders for the scripts, brand new ones that are still
in the shipping crate, but clearly the readers can bring and use their own.
Mine are vinyl, which is one of the "danger" surfaces for COVID-19.
I'm not exactly sure how many people will be there but I didn't invite a
whole lot of people anyway, so physical distancing should not be any sort
of problem. I did make it as clear as I could that I will not take offense
if any participants wish to bow out.
Clearly this is a fast evolving situation and it may be that by April 5,
meeting could be a really bad idea, or things might be on the upswing; I
guess we'll see.
It's Only a Play
is still in rehearsal but the
production dates have been moved to May 1-10. I had my first
blocking rehearsal last night,
however, we have moved rehearsal to The Guild for this week, which will
include tonight and tomorrow night. We won't meet next week. BCT is physically
connected to a seniors center and the city of Beavercreek has, quite
understandably, closed all access to the building until at least April 6.
At this point the U.D. School of Law
gig on March 30 is still on, but they are looking at a couple ways to make
the mock trial remote. I may be at the
Montgomery County Common Pleas Courts
or I may be on the U.D. campus.
Meanwhile, at my home theatre we had to bow down to the inevitable and
cancel the production run of
Morning's at Seven.
Sunday, on what was supposed to be Tech Sunday,
the cast did a full run of the show
in front of a few invited guests and some of our boardmembers. They were
not in costume and the soundwork
was not present. So, it wasn't a full-production performance, but it did
give the cast some closure. They had weeks of rehearsal that was going to
be for naught. At least they got one audience to see and appreciate their
work. And I was there. Their work was worth appreciating.
Here is the official announcement about the cancelation:
Our Production of Morning's at Seven is Canceled
March 16, 2020 update
The Dayton Theatre Guild continues to actively following the news along
with County, State, and Federal government recommendations with regards
to the coronavirus (COVID-19).
While we looked at postponing Morning's at Seven by Paul Osborn,
unfortunately there were too many complications that eliminated postponing
as a viable option. We therefore regret that we will need to cancel the
entire production of Morning's at Seven by Paul Osborn. With the
White House recommendation of cancelling any gatherings of ten or more,
it is apparent that we cannot risk the health of our actors, crew, and
patrons.
As you might expect, there was a lot of time, money, and effort already
invested in this production of Morning's at Seven by Paul Osborn.
We purchased the rights for the show, scripts, actors spent weeks
preparing, our set builder had nearly finished building the entire set,
and our costumers had completed sewing all the costumes and were just
about to tailor them for each actor. Not to mention all the lost revenue
from not being able to present the production. Therefore, we would like
to extend the option for you to help us cover some of these costs by
changing your ticket purchase into a donation. If you would like to help
by changing your ticket purchase into a donation, we would be happy to
send you a donation letter. However, we will also offer a refund if you
purchased tickets and would prefer a refund.
Our email is contactus@daytontheatreguild.org and our phone number is
937-278-5993. We hope that most will take us up on the offer to change
your purchase into a donation. Therefore, we will assume you would like
to change your ticket purchase into a donation if we DO NOT hear from
you. You only need to contact us with a message indicting you would like
a refund.
Thank you for your continued patronage and we wish you all good health.
The show opening has moved
again. As of today the rescheduled performance dates are June 12-21. I
think it's not unrealistic to not be shocked if the show ends up being
canceled altogether; I, in fact, think it's reasonably likely. But, you
know, this is a lesson in the journey having its own value outside of
reaching the destination. I will still study my lines and prepare myself
for the performances up until I know there is a cancelation.
Rehearsal scheduled for last
Wednesday night was moved to Thursday night. We did rehearse both last Monday
and Tuesday evening. Monday, director Debrah Kent finished blocking
Act 1, the portion of that act that introduces my character, Ira Drew.
Tuesday night we ran the whole act. Thursday we blocked Act 2. At this
point, we will not rehearse again until May.
As for where I am in the development of Ira, I have just barely the beginnings
of an idea about his voice, his persona. The other thing is that this is a
comedy and comedy is absolutely not my forte. I've managed to be
succesful at it before, so there is that.
VOCAL TRACKS TONIGHT?:
After a few weeks of my throat not being in good enough shape to handle the
vocal for the third song of my recent recording sessions ‐‐ that have been
spread now over a four month period ‐‐ I feel like I may be able to knock
them out tonight. Which is good, because I want to clear out the tracks on
my eight-track digital recorder and start on a new song that I just got the
idea for earlier today. So the sooner I can wrap number three up, the
better.
OUR LAST DTG SHOW OF THE SEASON IS CANCELED, TOO:
This morning we had our monthly Guild board meeting, via a
Zoom virtual meeting, which may be the
norm for the next couple meetings or more. It was not a special meeting, so
we discussed general business-as-usual issues, but, of course, the disposition
of our last show of this season,
The Old Man and the Old Moon
was obviously going to be on the agenda since the auditions were scheduled
for this coming Monday and Tuesday. We made the inevitable decision to
cancel the production, but are seriously considering resurrecting the
production in the 2021/2022 season.
The official DTG statement:
The rest of the DTG 2019/2020 season canceled
March 21, 2020 update
The Dayton Theatre Guild regrets to announce that due to the
COVID-19 virus, we will be cancelling the remainder of our
season. Looking at the social distancing that is occurring
overseas, we anticipate the US will alter its social distancing
requirements two or three month after other nations that have
been dealing with this longer alter their requirements. With
that expectation, we are likely seeing a return to normal
sometime in the Summer or Fall.
As you might expect, there was a lot of time, money, and effort
already invested in Morning's at Seven by Paul Osborn.
We purchased the rights for the show, scripts, actors spent weeks
preparing, our set builder had nearly finished building the entire
set, and our costumers had completed sewing all the costumes
and were just about to tailor them for each actor.
Our loss for The Old Man and the Old Moon will be less.
Fortunately, we were able to cancel auditions before they occurred.
We do however, have the lost revenue from not being able to
present both productions along with requested refunds.
Therefore, we would like to extend the option for you to help
support the Dayton Theatre Guild by changing your ticket purchase
into a donation. If you would like to help by changing your ticket
purchase into a donation, we would be happy to send you a
donation letter.
However, we will also offer a refund if you purchased tickets
and would prefer a refund.
We hope that most will take us up on the offer to change your
purchase into a donation. Therefore, we will assume you would
like to change your ticket purchase into a donation if we
DO NOT hear from you. You only need to contact us with a message
indicting you would like a refund.
Thank you for your continued patronage and we wish you all good
health.
Dayton Theatre Guild
THE MILF WILL ALSO RISE LATER:
Jennifer Joplin's
wonderful, self-authored, one-woman show, The Milf Also Rises, has
been postponed from early May at the
Human Race Theatre Company
to an undetermined later date. Can't say that I am much surprised.
FIRST WORK FROM HOME WEEK, (OR 80% OF ONE),
DOWN:
Yesterday marked my forth day working remotely from home, along with all my
colleagues at the Wright State University Libraries.
Most of the rest of campus is doing so by now, as well. Every WSU employee
who can or needs to work remotely will do so as of this coming Tuesday
because the university will be closed to all but essential personel as of
then. My boss let me know that if I want anything, work related or otherwise,
from my office, I have until Monday afternoon to retrieve such, then I will
not be allowed on campus.
So Monday I enter my second week working from home. At first, I resisted the
temptation to turn the TV on, but I gave in Wednesday, but it was programing
I've seen a lot, episodes I where I can recite most or all of the lines ‐‐
background noise. If I were to watch programing new to me, the distraction
would grab me and I would not be at all productive. But I have found that
those shows I know so well not only don't distract but also are a little
comforting to have on.
Usually when I post photos like this it's of me working on this blog, or a
DTG promocast, or maybe it could
be when I'm working on the play. These are COVID-19 Work from Home pics.
That's hot chocolate in that mug ‐‐ I don't do
coffee.
A bit dreary and overcast when I took this one,
but there were moments of sunshine. I can't wait
for the weather to break so I can move my
work-from-home office to the patio.
Yesterday, Ohio Governor, Mike DeWine
issued a stay-at-home order for all Ohio residents, which I think most of
us Ohioans were expecting to happen some time soon. We on the
DTG board, in fact, on
Saturday when we canceled
The Old Man and the Old Moon,
were pretty sure that DeWine was likely to make that decision for us sometime
soon, anyway. Sure, at the moment the order is only effective from midnight,
tonight through midnight April 6, but it would be a fool's bet to believe
it will not probably be extended.
With Gov. DeWine's state-wide stay-at-home order ending on April 6, the
April 5 closed table read
is obviously going to have to be postponed until a later time. Plus, as I
wrote above, I'm willing to bet the order gets extended past Apr 6.
Honestly, as impatience as I am to hear the new draft out loud, I was leaning
heavily toward a postponement, anyway. I was just ignoring the voice in my
head pointing out the inevitable.
I was going to take a lot of precautions. For one thing, the reading would
have moved into the theatre space so the very few people who would be there
would have a lot of room to distance themselves and I would have put the
four readers in chairs with music stands, very separated. But still, I wasn't
admitting to myself that I was 95+% on the verge of postponing anyway, based
on how things have been evolving.
When the reading will now take place is, like so many things right now, a
big unknown.
...My voice is in much better shape now. I rehearsed the lead vocal last
night. I wasn't and am not quite ready to lay the track down for a couple
reasons. First, my throat is not completely to where it needs to be; second,
I've decided I need to work the melody out some more ‐‐ the melody I have
at the moment isn't satisfying me. It needs some tweaking.
There will also be back vocals on the chorus section, at least three voices,
if not more. I am also thinking about doubling the lead vocal, too, which
is an old trick, that I believe was innovated by
The Beatles and
Sir George Martin,
though I may be mistaken. I do know that they did it habitually during the
Beatle tenure and that at least John
and Paul have used the technique
in their solo careers.
The U.D. School of Law gig on
March 30 is still on, but will be done virtually rather than on site at the
Montgomery County Common Pleas Courts.
It's a mock trial
that will be conducting proceedings the way some courts are right now, or
are planning to start doing: the different participants conducting their
questioning and testimony from separate locations via webcams.
In Ohio, in Gov. Mike DeWine's
briefing yesterday afternoon,
Ohio Department of Health Director Dr. Amy Acton
talked about the latest predictive model of the COVID-19 breakout in Ohio.
They are currently expecting perhaps as much as 10,000 new cases daily at
the epidemiological peak in Ohio. And they think that peak could happen
perhaps a late as mid-May. Dr. Acton qualified this as the current
worse-case scenario, based on the current closures and mandated social
distancing, with estimated variables, including taking into account people
who are not taking the distancing precautions. One of the things she did
say, as did Gov. DeWine at another point in the briefing, that, as she
stressed it was the worse-case prediction, she was hoping it turns out to
be wrong, but that both the response teams (especially the hospitals and
medical professions) and we citizens need to prepare now for that worst
case.
Actually, the U.D. School of Law
gig this coming Monday, March 30, is still on, with the remote, webcam
set up for the mock trial.
However, there was a need to double-up on playing characters, which meant
I would have to learn and memorize the pertinent facts for two more characters.
Because of the rest of my schedule, even in the stay-at-home, work-from-home
situation, I was not confident about getting all the information down in
time. I was more comfortable only refreshing my memory on the material
that I have done several times in the past. The trials were reduced to one
and another actor had enough time free to do all four witnesses, so I
was canceled.
I am determined to lay the vocal tracks tonight and the last of the
instrument tracks tomorrow with the goal of having the song mixed and
mastered before the weekend is over.
With the new models that put the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic in Ohio in
mid-May, I am more and more skeptical about the June 12-21 run dates for
the show.
Despite my skepticism, I am still studying my lines and character
development (the latter, as much as I can outside of
rehearsal). Rehearsal is
supposed to start in early May, but I fully expect that the
stay-at-home order will still be in place.
I have to further say that I am doubtful the show goes up in June. If it
happens, I strongly believe it's going to be later. But for the moment, I
embrase the philosophy of "the journey having its own value outside of
reaching the destination."