Click here for latest Blog Post
|
|
Sun, Oct 1, 2006
*slightly revised
-- to add information --
on Oct 7, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
'ART'
REHEARSALS: It is going well. After I wrap this entry up, I will
spend the rest of the late afternoon and then this evening
working toward my goal of getting as close to off-book for the
whole play as I can. I'm about 99.5% off-book for the first half,
and somewhat so a bit further on. But I need to get the end down
and wipe that .5% away from the beginning pages.
Character development-wise, I am close to the Stefen that satisfies
me. I had to experiment a bit to find him. For a while I was
going after what I was calling "the Niles Crane approach."
But that guy just wasn't working.
First off, there was just some grammar problems. Stefen says at
one point, "If you call something shit, you need to have
some criterion to judge it by." The Niles Crane version
could only end that sentence with: by which to judge it.
Then there's the fact that the Niles Crane guy would never use
the word fuck -- Stefen uses it several times.
Now, don't get me wrong, I was not trying to do K.L. doing
David Hyde Pierce doing Niles doing Stefen. I was just going
for an affectation of style that seemed in the same place. There
is a pretension to Stefen that easily lends itself to such
affectation. In the end, though, there are attributes to Stefen
that ultimately killed the Niles Crane approach.
I have an approach to Stefen now that will accommodate several
key elements of his make-up: he's a tad pretentious, though he's
more than just a "pseudo"-intellectual; he has some
striking vulnerabilities and sensitivities; yet he has
emotional strength as well as a strong sense of identity. I have
a Stefen who will walk on stage with the right voice and movement
to fit this make-up.
I have not created his bio yet, but I do know he's divorced with
children, since the text of the play says so. And just like
Serge has become Stefen, his ex, Françiose, is now
Francis.
MIDDFEST 2006:
As I write this I'm a couple hours from the last staged reading
for this year's Middfest International festival in Middletown,
Ohio. This year the festival celebrated China. Again, the
director was Deirdre Root. This year the performers were, all
from last year, Sarah Gomes, Helen Raymond, and myself.
We did an expurgated version of the play Red by Chay Yew.
I was the aging Beijing opera star Hua Wei Mun. We also read
three short stories by Ha Jin from his collection of short
stories, Under the Red Flag (University of Georgia Press).
First, Helen read the story, "Taking a Husband." Then
I read "Fortune." Sarah closed with "Winds and
Clouds over a Funeral."
The unfortunate thing is that, as last year, the staged readings
were placed in a poor location. We were in the middle of a kiosk
valley, inside a section of part of a parking garage. The overall
acoustics are not conducive. There's little signage. There was a
gong display right next to us, where children could bang the gong.
And bang the gong they did. Close by was a kiosk with perpetual
video of Chinese fireworks -- with the sound up. With no special
attention drawn to the readings and with the basic problem of
hearing the readings, we had hardly an audience member all
weekend. We had not one audience member for our first show
Saturday.
Well, by god, we performed our performances. And the check will
show up in the next few weeks.....
Kind of wanted to hang out and check the different displays out.
There were a lot of great artifacts and displays. However, I do
have a lot of line study for 'Art', so I couldn't hang
around too long after we were done today. I did grab some spicy
chicken on a stick from the Philippine tent in the food court and
hung out with Deirdre and her hubby Grant. Getting close to 2:30
I decided it was time to take the drive back up north.
Then the really wonderful moment of the day happened. I was on my
way to the exit from the festival, to where my car was parked. I
passed by the Chinese Opera tent and heard this fabulous Chinese
soprano singing this most enchanting melody over rich, textured
orchestration from a synthesizer.
It was Min Xiao-Fen, an instrumentalist and vocalist. She plays
an ancient Chinese lute called the pipa. When I walked by she was
finishing a song from a Chinese opera -- I don't the title of
either. Composer Gong-Qian Yang was accompanying her on synthesizer,
as the orchestra. I know they were finishing one of his compositions.
It was beautiful and her vocal was lovely. She has that eloquent
lithe and control, that effortless control of the voice that any
person who has a real interest in being a singer envies and tries to
achieve. There is always great skill in the artistic execution
that seems effortless.
She then played some traditional music on the pipa, followed by
interpretations of Miles Davis and Duke Ellington. I was
astounded. Her precision seemed flawless. Her web site says she
is "internationally known for her virtuosity and fluid style."
My experience earlier today is evidence that those words are
not simply hype.
I now have an interest in her work, Yang's work, and I think I am
going to explore Chinese opera in general, too.
Ms. Min's web site is:
www.bluepipa.org.
DRIVING MISS DAISY AT
THE DAYTON THEATRE GUILD:
Caught that performance of Driving Miss Daisy last night as
I'd planned. It was enjoyable and I am happy that the next time
I run into Miss Garcia, I will have seen her on stage rather than
just having a vague idea of her theatre tenure.
|
|
Fri, Oct 6, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
'ART'
REHEARSALS: Decent rehearsals again this week, Monday through
Wednesday. Monday and Tuesday were full rehearsals and my first
ones that can be categorized as "off-book," though I
did have to use my script for the closing monologues on Monday. I
certainly called for lines a bit and it is more than a little
safe to say I paraphrased a lot. I am one who wants to use the
wording in the text. To me the concept of "Oh well, it
was close enough, it meant the same thing" isn't good
enough. Of course, if I must paraphrase or use a pseudonym during
a performance in front of an audience, then I will. But, I'd
rather say it right off the page.
I did not much use Stefen's voice this week; I focused more on
remembering lines and emotional approach to them. As of this
coming Monday though, I intend for the full character to be on
the stage, in both voice and mannerisms. That will be dynamically,
of course, Stefen will still be evolving toward the Stefen that
stands there on October 27. I have not yet found that balance in
him that makes all his lines work. There is an approach to him
where he is refined and intellectual enough, yet not stiff, and
also not totally divorced from the everyday guy. It has to be in
character for him to both say, "your vicious inflexible
opinions and vile assumption of complicity" and also utter
"fuck" without it seeming out of the norm for him,
where it is not a case of him being vulgar for the sake of being
vulgar. I am also sure I am, at least to some extent, over
thinking this. If it's what I have to do to finally get a Stefen
that works for me, then that is what I will do. I'll bounce of a
wall or two to get to the center, what the hell.
Wednesday night the cast (all three of us) had a line rehearsal
at the home of cast member Dennis Latimer (Yvan, which may
become "Evan"). It was really more us getting the play
on tape again -- that is, again for them; I had not put it on
tape at all yet, which is uncharacteristic of my method, to wait
so long to record my lines. I have them now. So. it'll be words
not music in my ear phones and on my car speakers for the next
few weeks.
THE CHORUS FOR CANDICE
UPDATE: Based on some feedback I am going to make at least one
sound sweetening tweak. There is the sound of a door closing,
just before the song "Coma" begins to play. The idea is
that daughter Elizabeth has gone to her room and turned on her
stereo. Several people have told me they don't catch the sound
of the door closing. So, I am going to bring the volume on that
up.
I also really want to remix the equalization on Candice's last
line. It has a different sound to it than the rest of the her
dialogue soundtrack, and it bugs me, this lack of sound
continuity. I am at least going to play with it and see if I can
get the sound closer.
And that damned pop up frame of the credits. I still don't have
a reason nor a solution for it.
Sometime in the near future I will post the movie at
You Tube; I also have about
six weeks to get the final cut for
On The Lot, though
sooner rather than later would be good.
|
|
Sun, Oct 15, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
'ART'
REHEARSALS: Still going well, for the most part. Didn't have a
fabulous rehearsal Thursday night -- our last before a small break.
Least wise, it wasn't a good one for me. There was a bit of
production business that needed attended to so we actually got
started over an hour late; and didn't get to Act II.
Plus my impatience to get started brought down my energy and some
of my focus; I actually went up on a section I have been nailing
verbatim for the last two weeks.
Clearly focus issues that I still need to work on. I sometimes
allow myself to be distracted when there are conversations off
stage, and that is another focus problem I want to improve upon.
I'm still playing around with Stefen's character. I am moving
him back into the realm of that David Hyde-Pierce/Niles Crane
idea, though not totally. I think I am getting close to the
Stefen that will work. I am attempting to put ever-so-slightly,
a hint of a New York style accent, not Bronx or Brooklyn, but
a more, well, cosmopolitan dialect (vague as that description
is). Think of a muted version of, oh, Woody Allen, or, probably
more apropos, Martin Scorsese. I'm also looking for a speech
pattern that to a small degree suggests "putting on aires"
without being blatantly pretentious. Remember, he has to both
have an authentic feel of being cultured and yet be able to
comfortably say such things as fuck. He also has to both
actually know what he's talking about while at the same time
still giving off the energy of pretentiousness.
Speaking of character development for Stefen, here is some vital
information about him:
His full name is Stefen Jonathan Baxter. He was born May 12,
1960 at Mercy Medical Center on Long Island, New York --
though the hospital is in Rockville Centre, he grew up on
Long Island Sound in
Glen Cove.
His father was Martin, a civil engineer for New York City.
His mother, Martha, was a house wife. Stefen has one sister,
Elizabeth Faust (b: 07-18-1963), who now teaches civics,
history and social studies at Charles Carroll High School in
Philadelphia.
His mother is who introduced Stefen and his sister to the
world of art and literature; they frequented all the NYC museums
and galleries, as well as many symphonic concerts and some
ballet and opera. And, of course, both children inherited
their mother's love for fine books and poetry.
Stefen did his pre-med and earned his medical degree from
Columbia University
(specializing in dermatology). He did his residency at
Nassau University Medical Center, in East Meadow, NY.
He married Francis Taylor in 1988. They divorced in 1995.
They have three children -- one son and two daughters: Philip
David (b: 05-02-1990); Deborah Jeanine (b: 08-13-1992); and,
Taylor Ariel (b: 01-19-1994). He's had a series of failed
relationships since. Francis remarried in 2000.
Stefen now lives in Manhattan in a one bedroom apartment on
121st St. by Amsterdam Ave.,
a block from Morningside Park, and a few blocks north of
Columbia University. His office, for Lexington Med Associates,
with his five partners, is on
Lexington Ave. and 106th St.
He is on staff at
Lenox Hill Hospital, on East 77th
and has staff privileges at
Mt. Sinai Medical Center.
*REVISED OCTOBER 24, 2006 TO CHANGE STEPHEN TO THE CORRECT
STEFEN.
CAMERA ACTING GIG FOR SINCLAIR COMMUNITY COLLEGE:
Got an email last Thursday from Lisa Sadai about an audition for
a short scenario video for business classes at Sinclair Community
College. Lisa, who as well as being a fine local actor, was, if
you remember, also the AD/SS for The Chorus for Candice.
She is behind the scenes again as the production assistant for
the series of videos of which the one I auditioned for is a part.
I auditioned on Friday for the role of Mr. Babcock for a short
titled Not MY Courtney! and was cast. Babcock is the father
of a tween devil girl (Courtney) who in Daddy's eyes can do no wrong.
The scene is a conference with the principal at the brat's
junior high. Ms. Debra Kent (Grace & Glorie, Belles,
and more) is Principal Harper. We will shoot next Friday. We'll
have a table read rehearsal either Wednesday or Thursday, during
the day, due to 'Art' rehearsals at night. I have asked
the director if we can have them early enough that I have time
to go over my 'Art' lines prior to those 6:30 p.m.
rehearsals.
So I am in the ending process of getting my lines for 'Art'
totally etched into my brain and I now take on more lines to
memorize. Two things that make it easier. The video is five
minutes, tops; I have only a total of sixteen lines, though,
granted that several are a few sentences long. Second is that
being a video production, lines will often be shot in isolation,
and we obviously can retake. Not new information but it is the
reason I am not panicking -- though I have no intention of not
being prepared when I arrive.
IN THE AUDIENCE: I saw Moonlight & Magnolias last weekend
at The Human Race Theatre Company.
I was impressed. Very funny work from all the players. I do wish
I'd had a closer opportunity to have gotten on that stage. I am
not sure I would have made it, but jeez I wish I had at least
been actually called back as originally planned.
Oh well. Did I hear someone say, "Suck it up, Pal"?
And, to mention Ms. Sadia again, I saw The Exonerated at
The Dayton Playhouse
on Friday evening. Man how uncomfortable did that material make
me -- which is a complement to the players, the director and the
playwrights. There were a few actors in the cast that I know.
Besides Lisa, there were John Spitler and Charles Larkowski. It
was directed by local equity actor Alan Bomar Jones.
|
|
Tue, Oct 17, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
NOT MY COURTNEY FOR SINCLAIR COMMUNITY COLLEGE:
We have our only table read-through tomorrow afternoon, then we
shoot, as I said before, on Friday.
MY "GUEST APPEARANCE" WITH PAUL McCARTNEY: The
A&E special,
Paul McCartney: The Space Within Us
debuts on Saturday, October 28, at 10:00 p.m. Eastern Standard
Time. This is the program where there may be a
close up of me in the audience at Paul's Columbus, Ohio concert
last October. It is the night of a performance of
'Art', but
my VCR is already programmed! And you can be sure that rolling
the tape back and watching the show will be my first act upon
getting home that night.
|
|
Mon, Oct 23, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
'ART':
Show opens this coming Friday. Tech rehearsals don't begin until
tomorrow. The load in of platforms and the actual setting of the
stage set happen tonight. We three actors are doing a line run
tonight, rather than take the night off. We all feel like we
need it. We will sit with our backs to each other to concentrate
on lines, character, and emotion.
Last Wednesday and Thursday night rehearsals were, in my mind, crappy.
We all went up on lines we have had down pat. There were
some serious timing problems, too. Wednesday I got the note that
there are a lot of places where I need to "lighten up,"
that being the big refrain in general from director Jerry Boswell.
Thing is, I really thought I was lightened up. The note came as
a bit of a surprise to me, to be honest. I tried a different
approach to Stefen Thursday night (I have found that he is
officially SteFen, not, StePHen). At least one
production staff member thought I came off even heavier. Jerry
apparently did not because he commented that the idea I was
heavier was that person's opinion. Still, the approach to
Stefen I was using Thursday did not feel right to me at all.
So for me, the anxiety isn't over knowing lines. I do like it
better if I can be word perfect. However, as of tonight I will
no longer correct line errors. It's time to start giving full-on
performances, even though we will not do blocking tonight.
But saying the right words is less a worry than finding a happy
compromise between this lighter Stefen that Jerry wants and the
slightly pretension, takes-himself-a-tad-too-seriously Stefen whom
I really feel is correct. I tried a few different takes on him
this weekend that were attempts to meld the two approaches
together. I guess we will see if there was any success.
NOT MY COURTNEY FOR SINCLAIR COMMUNITY COLLEGE:
The shoot on Friday went well, though it was a pretty long day for me.
I had really little chance to go over the lines for this in the
days prior to the shoot, due to 'Art'. I looked them over
a bit the night before, then I got up at a little after 4:30
Friday morning and spent a couple hours on them, Call was at
8:30. It was a full production day and we ended around 4:00.
My big LEARN for the day: leaving handles in between lines
of dialogue. What that means is, when you shoot the same scene
from two or more points of view, you want to leave handles at
the end of each screen moment so you have some breathing room
for editing. And, as in the cases from this shoot, this is
especially important with conversations. The usual case, which is
the standard, is the reversal shot edits, where you see the person
talking from the point of view of the person listening, then the
focus changes to the opposite point of view when the other person
responds.
Of course, the pace of the dialogue will be that usually there is
very little silent space between the end of one actor's lines
and the other actor's response. But that tightness of dialogue
in these POV edit scenes is created in the editing room. In
production you shoot one side of the conversation, all of one
actor's lines, then you shoot the other POV. If you're a smart
director, you'll keep the camera rolling on each actor during the
periods where the other actor is speaking, for reaction shots.
It's best for someone -- a production person, at least, if not
the other actor -- to feed the off-camera lines to the actor on
camera. And, if I am on set, I will feed my screen-mate my lines,
because I think I ought to.
The handles come in here. During this sort of shooting, there
needs to be longer than natural pauses between each line of dialogue.
This gives the editor space (breathing room) so that edit cuts
don't have to be trimmed too close to the end of an actor's line,
thus clipping it. And the editor can have the action cut back
and forth between the two characters during the conversation.
The unnatural spaces are eliminated (trimmed) in the final edit
because the editor can sit the response as close as he or she wants.
Thus the natural pacing of conversation is created by virtue of
how the shots are edited together.
Of course, when a master shoot (wide shot) or a two shot (both
actors in frame) are being shot, the actors do have to
use those natural, closer pauses, because the editor cannot in
these cases eliminate dead space, not without the jump being
noticed on screen, known as a jump cut. Unless they are being
used specifically for effect -- usually in suspense or horror (or
spoofs thereof, jump cuts are a bad bad thing.
As for the handles between dialogue on the Not MY Courtney
set, the director Todd Ruel needed to remind me a few times during
these reversal shots to leave them. First, on stage, as an actor,
I try to avoid those unnatural dead spaces. Also, when I produced
the still unreleased Muse, and when I performed in Nona, the
characters were on screen alone -- no dialogue handles were needed.
On the Ghostbusters: Spook University
set, these handles were never asked for. The nature of the action
and the shot plots for
The Chorus for Candice
made such handles unnecessary. But, I am not sure I would have
thought to ask for them, had they been.
On my Chorus set, I did have shot handles, a few seconds before and after the action
of each shoot added in. But those were all I needed. Well, dialogue handles are now part of
my "MR. BIGSHOT MOVIE DIRECTOR"
production arsenal.
By the way, I had already said that Debra Kent was in the
Not MY Courtney cast as Principal Harper;
the young lady playing Courtney is Katrina Baker. Among her
credits, she was in the locally produced indy horror film,
Immortally Yours, which is
currently in post. Katrina is also a lovely singer. If you go to
her web site you can hear the song she co-wrote and sings, which
she has submitted to the Immortally Yours producers for
consideration as the crawl theme. It's an adult contemporary
pop song.
IN THE AUDIENCE: Friday was a very long day for me because I was
up at circa 4:30 and was full-tilt for almost the next twelve
hours on the video shoot, being on campus at Sinclair, from about
8:30 on. My day on that campus was not yet over though. I had
to be back in time to, along with most of the cast and crew of
the Guild version, catch the 8:00 curtain for the SCC production
of The Cripple of Inishmaan. I didn't bother with the one
hour round-trip drive home, then back again. I did drive a few
minutes down the road to try and sneak a little nap in at the
Guild. Didn't work out though. The Guild was empty, but there
was too much urban ambient sound (noise) going on. So I
paced the theatre going over Stefen lines then headed back to
SCC campus.
It was a very odd experience for me seeing another vision of
Cripple, which was my birth canal back into acting. I can't say that
I should have any business giving any sort of response to the
esthetic value of the show I saw Friday night. I have too much of
a visceral and emotional attachment to this play to objectively
observe anyone else's interpretation of any aspect of the show. I
have criticisms, but I don't trust that they come from a place
even remotely unbiased, so I don't see any value in expressing
them.
It was good for me as an actor to see the show and especially to
see Patrick Hayes' work as Johhnypateen. This challenging role
has a special place in my heart, he being my first stage character
after all that time away. It was good, though very uncomfortable,
to see another actor give him a completely different soul. I
will not comment, compare or contrast my Johnny and Patrick's.
What I will say is that I find Patrick a good actor and his
Johnny Pateen Mike O'Dougal reaffirms my previous assessment.
And it is healthy for me to have such an in-your-face example that
there are many ways to successfully play a role.
Saturday turned out a little different than I'd planned. The
plan was, go to the Guild board meeting in the morning, drive to
Mason Ohio and see Charity Farrell, as well as a few other actors
I know, in the
The Children's Theatre of Mason
production of Oliver, directed by
Carrie-Ellen Zappa.
Then I would spend the evening working on that character adjustment
for Stefen.
Well, what I didn't know until I got to the theatre in Mason was
that the Saturday matinee was the understudy performance. So,
Charity, who was usually Nancy, was now a Fagen boy and chorus
member. At first I was resigned that I missed my movie's co-star
in her bigger Oliver role. But, I decided that I had driven fifty-some
miles to see her as Nancy, so, after the matinee, I went out to
eat, then paced the parking lot at the theatre working on Stefen.
I saw Charity as Nancy that evening and I must say she was at
her best. I was not surprised, since I already think of this young
lady as talented as all get-out, but I was certainly impressed.
I have to say I was impressed with the whole production.
Carrie-Ellen, who you may remember, taught the classes I took this
year from
The Human Race Theatre Company,
is the other major reason I wanted to see this show. I was sure
her direction would be great, and I was right.
LETTER TO THE EDITOR THAT ACCUSSES
THE DAYTON THEATRE GUILD
OF RACISM: A woman wrote into
The Dayton City Paper
and insinuated racism in the showing of Driving Miss Daisy
at the Guild. She leveled the same charge against
La Comedia for mounting
Miss Saigon. I don't know the script for the latter, but I
saw the Young at Heart Players production of Driving Miss Daisy
at the Guild, and it seems to me that the gist is that an elderly
southern woman has some pre-conceived, racist notions about
African Americans, but is subsequently exposed over decades to a
decent, upright, loving and compassionate black man. They become
close friends. What's that famous line?: "Hoke, you're my
best friend."
I believe Driving Miss Daisy is a comment on
racism and the ignorance of it, rather than racist in its essence.
But moreover I think its about something more universal: how
people whom it is assumed by some cannot connect, indeed
can connect.
And though this is obviously not clear evidence that the play is
not racist, I will point out that Alfred Uhry won a Pulitzer for
the play. And I have a difficult time believing that such an
earnest and thoughtful man as Morgan Freeman, who plays Hoke in
the movie version, would connect himself with a racist work. But
I can see him involving himself in art that examines and confronts
racism. I assert he was doing the latter when he took on the
role. And I assume so was Garry Prichett, who was Hoke at the
Guild.
|
|
Thu, Oct 26, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
'ART':
Tonight will be the final dress. It's really only the second run
in full tech. Tuesday night we ran scenes while there was lots of
tech business going on around us. There we lights being set and
full blown conversations. I must say that it was the first time I
have ever had that sort of chaotic distraction going on around me
and not lost focused. We didn't do a full run of the show that
night, it was really Randy, Dennis and myself attacking areas we
each needed work on.
Last night's full run went well. We all flubbed lines but we went
on and I think covered well. We didn't get our director's notes,
but they are coming before rehearsal tonight. The AD, Nancy
Mahoney (Hagg in Endgame, last
year), told us that she didn't know what was different last night
but she thinks it all clicked together. I guess we shall see if
that translates to the six performances.
I feel pretty good about my Stefen. I felt that there were a few
places where I let my characterization slip some, but I am not
sure whether that is more than just my feeling or simply so. I
tried to move myself off that more affected, almost pretentious
version of Stefen, but couldn't make myself. I think he is a
little stiffer than what director Jerry Boswell wants, and I
can 't help myself. It is the Stefen that the text tells me is
appropriate for me -- based mostly on the words he often chooses
to use, especially in context with the scenes. What can I say,
how I can go out there a play him in a way that I feel betrays
both the script and my own instincts? I am doing my best to honor
the lightness he wants, which I agree with, without taking some
of the put up presence in Stefen that I believe is true to his
persona.
The lighting is a tech problem. The ceiling is so low that the
trees can't take the lights up very high. We are casting pretty
pronounced shadows behind us, onto a white wall.
|
|
Fri, Oct 27, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
'ART':
Have to tell you that I thought that Act
II derailed a bit last night in our
final dress rehearsal, though everyone else seemed to think
the whole performance was good. Lines were dropped and the timing
was off in many places. At one point, I was mentally in the
wrong part of a scene and was thus waiting for the wrong cue.
When I got the cue I was supposed to be getting, it took me a
moment to backtrack from where I was in my head, which gave way
to a dead moment on stage.
The good comments about final dress were that the characters are
fully present and that there is great energy, both certainly good
to hear. I was still not happy myself with the "derailing"
in Act II.
On the other hand, I am, naturally, still most exited about
opening night!
|
|
Mon, Oct 30, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
'ART',
OPENING WEEKEND: We had a successful opening weekend. The
audiences were small but the responses were great. Naturally,
there were those occasional line flubs and line losses -- and
my contribution to those was equal with my castmates. What
separates an amateur performance from a professional one is
not necessarily that you don't flub or forget a line, but what
you do with it when you do. The pro approach is to not telegraph
your error to the audience. Sometimes that is unavoidable,
revealing that your erred. Usually you can smoothly hide it,
though, and I believe we all did every single time.
I still am not happy when I blow lines, even if it is a small
error. That's got to do with having a perfect performance as my
target even though I know that will not be met. Aiming for it
certainly helps get me closer.
My big complaint about Stefen, (or concern, or whatever you want
to call it), is that I don't think he got the laughs the text
intended him to get. This is not a new complaint, I thought that
about my Johnny Pateen in Cripple...,
too. There just is a certain comedic instinct that I don't have,
a certain comedic savvy I have not developed. I probably ask for
the laugh and not the butter. That referring to an old show business
adage that means the joke is there already, you don't have to
tell it, just let the audience see the humor of the situation.
I.E., don't try to be funny when you ask for the butter, just
ask for it, the situation will make it funny. I tried to
"just ask for the butter," but I still did not get the
laughs that I think are in the text.
Or maybe I'm just self-involved and paranoid.
Next weekend I think we will have bigger audiences. We have a
brush up rehearsal next Thursday night, tech but not full dress.
Meanwhile I start to prepare myself for upcoming auditions I am
interested in.
MORE ON MY "GUEST APPEARANCE" WITH PAUL McCARTNEY:
Well, the A&E special,
Paul McCartney: The Space Within Us
debuted Saturday night, then was shown again a few hours later.
I, however, programmed my VCR timer wrong so I only got about
the first five minutes. If my mug is on screen, I do not yet know.
I am about the only person who really cares, either way,
though, I'm sure.
|
|
Wed, Nov 1, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
NOT MY COURTNEY: Director Todd Ruel emailed the cast
yesterday to tell us that the rough cut of the video looks really
good and is really funny -- I am sure that the "funny"
is mostly due to Katrina Baker who was great as my devilish
little daughter. The final cut will be soon and we will have a
little screening. We will also get DVD's as well as DV tape for
our actors' reels.
|
|
Sat, Nov 4, 2006
*Revised just slightly later in the day
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
LAST NIGHT'S PERFORMANCE OF 'ART'
AT THE SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART:
First, we had a pretty stiff brush-up rehearsal Thursday. Nothing
that got us panicking, but it was not as well-oiled as we have
proven we can make it.
Here's the interesting thing: I certainly did not feel like we
had a bad show last night, and I don't think I tanked it, but I
wasn't overly ecstatic about my work. Also, though I thought
we were dong well as a cast, I'd probably have judged us in the
B to B+ area for overall performance.
The consensus of most non-cast production folk is that last night
was our best show yet. As well, Jerry Boswell, our director, told
me I was "smoking" -- his word -- that it was my best
night so far, and he used other flattering adjectives about my
work while he spoke to others.
I certainly am happy and gratified by the reaction to my work in
specific, and I am very satisfied that the ensemble got such a
rating from people. My response to all that though is: Really?
It's proof perfect how difficult it is to know how your own work
is going on stage. As I have said before, I can only trust what
I feel about a performance (including auditions); and I can only
trust that I know what I felt; I cannot trust that the feeling
means anything besides that it is the way I feel.
I felt a little "off" last night. I felt, at some spots,
a bit disconnected from the action. There seemed to me to be a
few timing and pacing problems last night for all of us -- my
castmates expressed the same thought on this last idea, too. And
yet, the production crew thought we did great and we were told
the audience commented more favorably than ever -- though they
were complementary last week, too.
Had you asked me in a vacuum about last night's show I would
have said, Well, it was a good show, but I think maybe last
week we had a couple better ones. There are a lot of votes
that differ from that.
Now, of course, I started to think about what it was we did, and
that I did in specific. Fortunately, I gave up quick. Bottom line,
the closest to come is this:
The only thing I can accurately say about my work last night
was I tried, and apparently with success, to stay in the
moment on stage. That's the only thing I can repeat. The
internal dialogues for any specific moment; the inflections
of voice; the emphasis on particular words; what I did with
my eyes; where I moved and when: who knows? Granted, some
of these might come to me when I am at those points in the
story on stage -- and that is fine.
I also admit that I made some decisions this week as I was
running my lines about what is going on in Stefen's head at
particular times. I also better evaluated his agendas in
certain places. Perhaps some of that was reflected in last
night's show. Still, I have to just be organic about this,
just go on stage with my present understanding of Stefen.
So I'm just gonna go do the show today as today's shows. Last
night was great, but tonight's show is tonight's show.
|
|
Mon, Nov 6, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
FINAL WEEKEND OF PERFORMANCES OF 'ART' AT
THE SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART:
Another show down. Our second and last weekend was just as good
as the first; in some ways it seems it was a bit better. All
informed accounts still make this last Friday night our best show
of the run -- but, ya know, one of them has to be the best show
and one of them has to be the least show -- despite that which is
which will differ depending on who is giving the critiques.
I felt the best, personally, about this Saturday's show. I was
the deepest involved with Stefen that night. The audience response
was the most energetic, too, which I cannot doubt helped me to be
where I was with Stefen.
Over the course of the run, we three each had those moments on
stage when we went up on lines. My worst one was yesterday. I
simply stayed in character, looked thoughtful for that brief
moment, then, using Stefen's idiosyncrasy of contemplating his
words, repeated a line to get myself back in rhythm. I am not at
all sure I hide the error, but I at least did not let Stefen leave
the stage. I am, of course, not happy that I went up; but I am
at least happy I didn't self destruct.
And, well, we had a damn good run with this show! Several people
who saw 'Art' at The Human Race
said they liked our production better. One person who saw it on
Broadway liked ours, as well. And, too, a man and granddaughter
saw it on London's West End, and they liked our version.
There will be pictures at some point. But that's a make time
for it thing; like the rest of those
Ghostbusters: Spook University
pictures, that aren't up yet. (In terms of working with
graphics for the web, my priority is actually finishing the
artwork for
On the Edge of the Pulsewave,
artwork that is somewhat close to finished).
So now, as far as acting, I move on to reading the plays I plan
to audition for next.
|
|
Fri, Nov 10, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
COOL GIG COMING UP: Here's a nice confidence builder. A law
professor from The University of Dayton
saw 'Art',
and because of that has asked if I want to perform as a witness
for a monthly gathering called the Inns of Court. It's a mock
trial sort of exercise. I am guessing that the lawyer noted in the
'Art' program that my last stage appearance was in Fake
at FutureFest 2006,
and knew that Fran Pesch directed that. Fran is involved with
the U.D. Law Clinic and this Inns of Court; she casts and directs
the actors for them. She is who actually approached me about
doing this. I am to be a "difficult" witness in what
will be a guided dramatic improvisation.
Well, I haven't exactly been discovered by Cecil B. DeMille here.
Still, it's gratifying to have made enough of an impression with
my work that a person in the audience actively sought using me
for a project, and is the one who made the initial approach.
It's also good to be actively involved in this improvisational
forum. There will be some detailed guidelines for my character
that I will have to honor, and this is a great opportunity
for me, because I have an idea brewing that has improv at the
heart of it. In fact, improv with some specific parameters is
very likely the mainstay of the improv I have in mind.
|
|
Wed, Nov 15, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
AUDITIONS AT
THE DAYTON THEATRE GUILD:
Monday night and last night I auditioned for the first two
2007 shows at the Guild, Byrony Lavery's Frozen and Amy
Freed's The Beard of Avon. It was a most interesting
experience, to audition for two shows at the same time, for all
involved, I am sure. For me, it was switching back and forth
between a dark, mesmerizing killer and pretty much a foppish,
English dandy, those being the two roles I am after in the two
respective plays.
There were lots of folks and lots of competition for all the
roles in both plays. We had a lot of new faces for the Guild,
along with a lot of the "usual suspects." Both
directors (Justin Reiter -- Frozen & Natasha Randall
-- Beard...) have their work cut out as far as casting is
concerned.
I and several rather talented other men are after the role of
Ralph in Frozen. Ralph is a serial killer, a
lower-middle-class Englishman who fancies young girls. I suppose
I did all right with my reading, but some few other men did just
as well and I suspect fit the type closer. So I have no
expectation of being cast in Frozen. There is another male
role, a guard. It is a non-speaking supporting role. Frankly, if
I am not cast as Ralph, I am using the time to catch up on other
projects.
As for Beard.... I felt good about the auditions, but, as
always, we will see what happens. I went after the role of the
Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere. I think I have a bit of stiff
competition for that role, as well. Natasha did read me quite a
bit for Will (William Shakespeare), but I don't know that it
meant she was considering me for the part as much as it was about
needing someone to read with the other actors in the audition scene.
My own reading of the play, for one thing, calls for a much
younger Will than I could bring off.
I did have one rather weak reading as Will, I must admit. A stone
cold reading toward the end last night. Other than that, I think
I did well enough, or, at least didn't suck.
DOCUMENTARY DVD FOOTAGE FOR
GHOSTBUSTERS: SPOOK UNIVERSITY:
Going to Channel 2, WDTN TV
this coming Sunday to be shot for documentary commentary about
the making the Ghostbusters fan film. Director Mike Sopronyi has
also asked to use the DV behind-the-scene footage I shot on most
days I was on set. I, of course, said yes.
|
|
Thu, Nov 16, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
RIGHT AND WRONG: Turns out I was correct about the probability
of my being cast in Frozen and essentially wrong in terms
of how I felt about the audition for The Beard of Avon,
with the possible exceptions that the last cold read as Will was
not terribly good and that I will not be Oxford.
In other words, "It's on to the next audition."
(EARLY EVENING, OR: PART DUHH!)
DOH! OR, STILL
WRONG: Okay, I'm a dunderheaded, neurotic moron. Turns out I am
cast in The Beard of Avon, in the role of Old Colin. It
will be a fun character role. So now I go from feeling all
dejected to feeling a bit stupid. Ms. Randall had called and
left a message for me late Wednesday night on my machine. I missed
that it was there; I was asleep when it came, I do believe. Later
I woke and checked my email to see a cast list that did not have
my name on it -- because I had not confirmed that I would accept
the role. So, as I told Natasha when we straightened this out,
I assumed [she] went another way, as they say.
Well, I am quite pleased to be in Tosha's show. I will still be
trying to get to several stalled projects in the meantime --
though I admit I am looking at some other auditions for shows
during what would have been my Frozen rehearsal time. More
on all that later. I am off to see a play, The Foreigner at
Brookville Community Theatre.
|
|
Thu, Nov 23, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
First, for all those from or living in The
United States of America:
-- - -- - -- - -- - --
Happy
ThanksGiving
-- - -- - -- - -- - --
|
SEE ME ACT ON YOUTUBE: Director Todd Ruel has posted the final
cut of Not MY Courtney on YouTube. To remind, this short
video has Katrina Baker in the title role of Courtney -- the
devil child, Debra Kent as Principal Harper, and myself as the
wool-over-his-eyes, idiot father who does not believe his
Courtney can do any wrong. Plus, the production assistant is the
incomparable Lisa Sadia (my AD/SS for The Chorus for Candice,
as well as fine actor in her own right).
There's another video there from the same series, one entitled
Cutting in Line that features almost all actors I know to
some extent or another: John Spitler (who was Babby Bobby Benton
in The Cripple of Inishmaan and
is now on the The Dayton Theatre Guild
board); Brian Buttrey (who has stage managed the two Guild show I
produced, Grace & Glory and Belles); another
Guild board member, Harold Fox (with whom I was in I Never Sang
for My Father, and who also appears in Arsenic and Old Lace,
mentioned below); there are also John Beck and Zendyn Duellman,
both whom I have seen in several
FutureFest
and other
Dayton Playhouse
mountings. There are some other face whom I recognize, perhaps
from fellow attendance at plays, but I otherwise have not yet
met them.
The URL to the YouTube posting of both these videos is:
www.youtube.com/profile?user=promotodd.
* AS OF NOVEMBER 27, 2006, BOTH NOT MY COURTNEY
AND CUTTING IN LINE ARE NOT AT TODD'S YOUTUBE PAGE. THEY MAY HAVE
HAVE BEEN A TEMP POSTING, OR THEY MAY RETURN LATER.
PLAYS: I saw a couple nice mountings of plays last weekend.
- Thursday, as I said I would, I saw The Foreigner at
Brookville Community Theatre.
This had Alex Charmical (most recently Charles in Blithe
Spirit at The Dayton Playhouse
and the graphic designer of Wally Rabbit -- *(see
my movie icon above). Really a very startling dramatic
interlude toward the end of this Larry Shue play, brought
about by a bad guy played by Donald Smith; Donald was, of
course, in both incarnations of Sordid Lives as well
as -- unlike me (Not That I'm
Bitter!!) -- cast in the indy film, The Monster's
Mind last year. The Foreigner was directed by Saul
Caplan, who directs fairly frequently and acts even more so,
and has picked a few theatrical awards up along the way.
- Speaking of The Dayton Playhouse,
I was there Friday to see Dutch Waterman and Joan Harrah in
Arsenic and Old Lace. For those not a part of the Dayton
Theatre scene (i.e.: four of the seven people reading this),
Dutch, not only is a member for life of
The Dayton Theatre Guild
(and our cookie donations chairperson), but is a long-standing
veteran of the Dayton Theatre Community. I have heard her
referred to as the Grand Dame of Dayton Theatre. Ms. Harrah,
is too a veteran of Dayton Theatre. She also is one half of
the Broadway Broads, the other half being Reneé
Franck-Reed *(who will be Queen Elizabeth in The Beard of
Avon). It was wonderful to see Dutch and Joan in the
roles of the Brewster sisters -- even if they are serial
killers (the sisters not the actresses).
I was Dr. Einstein in the 1975 Wilbur Wright High School
production of this. There are pictures out there somewhere.
Alas, I have none. Chuck Scott, whom you three loyal blog
readers will know was my high school theatre director, had
me play Einstein like Peter Lorre, Dr. Einstein in the
Frank Capra film -- well, I did the best imitation I could;
I'm not going to guess it was striking in the least.
Bill Stewart was a fine Einstein in this DPH production. This
is the third time now I have seen another actor in a role I
once played. The first was when I went to see You Can't
Take It With You last year at
The University of Dayton.
The other time was, of course, just recently when I saw
The Cripple of Inishmaan at
Sinclair Community College.
This, like the U.D. experience, was not as odd for me as the
Cripple experience was. First, it was thirty-one years
ago I played Einstein. Just the distance in time, itself, is
an element. Plus, I never had the sentimental attachment to
the role that I did for Johnny in Cripple, since being
cast as Johnny has such import for me.
Also in the cast, at least of whom I've worked with before:
John Bukowski (The Diviners), Harold Fox -- as mentioned
earlier, and Roger Watson (Sordid Lives and Fake).
INTERVIEW FOR DVD EXTRA: Went to Channel 2, WDTN TV
last Sunday to be interviewed by TV 2 news reporter
Dan Edwards
for the documentary DVD that will accompany
Ghostbusters: Spook University.
Probably took about ten minutes. I felt pretty much like a dork.
It wasn't exactly Al Pacino on
Inside the Actor's Studio,
in, of course, any sense, but no less in terms of eloquency. I
must have caught at least a half dozen malapropisms come out of
my mouth, which I managed to correct, usually awkwardly. Who
knows how many I didn't catch.
IN BETWEEN NOW AND FEBRUARY: There is read through coming up in
a few weeks for The Beard of Avon, and one more rehearsal
a few weeks later. Essentially, however, this production does
not go into rehearsal until February. Our director, Natasha Randall,
has asked us to be, if not off-book, close to off-book when
rehearsals begin. Old Colin does not have a tome's worth of
dialogue. And even if I am doubled into one or two more roles,
it still won't be a great amount to get down. Being almost off
book for Beard in February should not be a problem even
if I manage to be in another show before then. Not that I don't
have a lot of other artistic projects that could also be attended
to between now and then. Some really MUST be attended to.
Now, please excuse me as I go over-eat like a good, hedonistic
American citizen . . .
CLOSING NOVEMBER 26 AT THE
DAYTON THEATRE GUILD:
Directed by Gil Martin / Produced by Michael Boyd
The Pride's Crossing cast list:
Joanna Drapser, Cassandra Engber, Sarah Gomes, Craig
Roberts, Paul Edwards, Robin Smith, Eric Weiss.
Ms. Smith is in the role of Mabel.
|
|
|
Mon, Nov 27, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
THIS JUST IN....CHANGE
IN MY CASTING IN THE BEARD OF AVON: I have just been
recast as theatre troupe leader John Heminge. I may be
double-cast as Old Colin, still, depending on whether the actor
Natasha is going to offer him to accepts. I suspect he will
unless he's already committed himself to something else.
Well, now, Old Colin would have been fun to do, and I was truly
looking forward to it. But, Heminge is a bit meatier of a role
and more interesting. So, I am pleased about the change. It
would be a cool challenge to play two such completely different
roles, but I am not going to be disappointed if that does not
happen. Mostly because I'd like to see the casting that Tosha
has in mind come to be.
I must admit, though, I did relesh Old Colin's line at the top
of Act II, " Has't seen my pussy?"
-- one of the ten-thousand double entendres in this play.
*above item added a bit later in the day
ON THE LOT
DEADLINE MOVED ONCE AGAIN: Well, the deadline for submission
was, at one time September 1. Then it was December 1. Now it is
February 16. I have not looked at any movies already there. I
think I am a bit afraid that there will be some excellent work
there that will intimidate me about submitting. I am tempted to
not view any until I have submitted mine, least I lose my nerve
and not submit it. I mean, it's not as if I have some grand
delusion that I am some wunderkind newby with surprisingly
brilliant talent for movie making. I am, in my own estimation,
a new "film" maker who may have a movie of merit --
but I have enough sense to know there will be stiff competition
and more than a few directors who will clean my clock.
I still need to submit the movie, however.
INNS OF COURT LAW CLINIC DINNER: Have a rehearsal tonight for
the clinic dinner tomorrow night. I underestimated the amount
of facts I need to have down, but I think I'll be okay.
I retyped all the pertinent information, as an active learning/memory
devise. Then I spoke it all into a tape recorder, which I am now
listening to all day long. I will also look at my break down
document, that I typed up.
ENDEAVOR I FORGOT TO MENTION: Forgot to list editing the music
video for my song "Rabid Rack" in those other artistic
ventures that can stand immediate attention, from last post.
Although it won't be anywhere close to the calibre that might
win an MTV or VH1 -- or whatever -- award.
|
|
Wed, Nov 29, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION INN OF COURT DINNER: Ahh, another
paying gig under my belt, as an actor. This brings my 2006 tally
in actor's fees to $130. Won't be long before I buy that small
south-American island!
As for my performance, will it surprise anyone that I will have
to give myself a mixed review? I'd say my characterization was
good but I don't believe I completely followed through with my
assigned task of being a difficult witness. As Fran said to me,
after it was over and I expressed this same sentiment, "Oh,
K.L., you always do that to yourself" that being the
super self-critical tendency I have.
Nevertheless, I believe there were some inequities in my work. For
the direct examination, I was to be nervous. I played it nervous
but it occurs to me that had I upped the dial a little I may been
a better difficult witness for my side. I also was supposed to
have a vaguer recollection of the end of the evening in question.
I don't think I executed that well.
On the cross examination I was to be more deliberate in my
answers, giving short one word answers whenever I could. I was
also to get agitated with the lawyer and was to question the
meaning of words or even whole questions. I failed completely in
terms of the short answers -- I quite frankly forgot I was to do
so. I did manage to get angry a few times but am not too sure it
made for a "difficult witness." I also never asked for
clarification. In my defense -- but only to some extent -- the
young lady who crossed me gave me little in a challenge that
would have been plausible to provoke anger. I found no places
to question her inquiries, either, though I think I probably
missed opportunities by not readily recognizing them.
Like I said, I do think I brought a believable character to the
proceedings -- I just missed the assigned task a bit.
The lesson for me as an actor trying learn more is, once again,
another variation of focus. I let some of the task at hand slip
my mind as I was performing. That is a focus issue.
Focus: pretty important element to acting.
I did perform with no actual rehearsal. The "rehearsal"
Monday night was really a brief meeting and overview. I am not
putting the performance problems on this. I have charged myself
with developing the skill of improv with no rehearsal; so even
though I concede that I would have done better had there been
some sort of practice -- except there would have been no way to
practice the unknown questions the lawyers would ask in the real
session -- I am still charged to improve the skill of improv
with no rehearsal at all.
As for the other actor and his work: it was Gerry Sadia
(husband of Lisa, father of Benjamin, fellow DTG board member).
He was nothing less than hilarious and certainly presented the
lawyers with the task to deal with a difficult witness. He did
especially so with his round-robin, run-on answers.
|
|
Mon, Dec 4, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
CHRISTMAS BELLES A HIT AT THE DAYTON THEATRE GUILD: Well
the six performances of Christmas Belles, crammed into
four days, were a hit with the audiences. We had large audiences
for five of the six shows. Saturday night there were about two
dozen people, but they were responsive and gave the cast some
energy to play off. A good limited run and some more loot in the
building fund!
|
|
Thu, Dec 7, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
GOOD REVIEWS FOR CHRISTMAS BELLES:
Both Terry Morris (Dayton Daily News)
and Russell Florence Jr. (Dayton City Paper)
gave Christmas Belles good reviews. Terry, in fact, must
have rushed home Friday night wrote the review and send it to his
editor via email post haste, because his review was in the
Saturday paper.
I admit I have not read Terry's review, but I was at the theatre
and I know the cast was very pleased. And the Dayton City
Paper web manager hasn't updated the DCP site -- it
is always days behind the paper version.
|
|
Sun, Dec 10, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
LOTS OF MISCELLANY
- More On the Christmas Belles
Reviews (and a correction): First the correction, Terry Morris
(Dayton Daily News)
saw the show Thursday night, as did Russell Florence Jr.
(Dayton City Paper).
Terry's review appeared in the Friday, Dec 1 issue, not on
Saturday as I stated in the last entry here. And I was there
hosting and took the tickets from both of them and still got
mixed up. They say confusion is a sign that you are open
minded.
Terry's review, as I said, was complementary, calling the
show "steady, fun nonsense." Russell also gave the
show kudos: "a fun and silly dose of familial dysfunction."
Click here for Russell's full review;
I do not believe Terry's is available on-line.
- I saw a Really Sweet Production of The Wizard of Oz
Yesterday at
The Dayton Playhouse:
I was to see it Friday night, but my young friend Charity
Farrell (Elizabeth in my The Chorus for Candice),
who was double-cast with the talented young Joanna Drapser
(Pride's Crossing) as Dorothy, was ill, too ill to go
on. I exchanged my tickets for the Saturday matinee. It was
iffy that Charity would be well enough then, but she did go
on.
Truth be told, I had an interest in seeing both young ladies
in the role, but this weekend has been really full. I could
not take time to see the show twice. I had to move some
Saturday afternoon project work -- something about long
overdue illustrations for a long overdue
virtual chapbook --
to Friday evening.
As I told Charity after the show, she is a trouper. She was
not fully recovered but she did a good job. Her voice was not
as strong as it can be, but she sang well and gave her
performance her all -- real pro attitude and execution. The
student of theatre in me was served well by her example.
I had half-way thought about auditioning for The Cowardly
Lion; Saul Caplan was in that role, so I pretty much figure
my audition would have just been practice. I had also sort
of thought about the Scarecrow but figured it would need a
better dancer than I am (a much better dancer than I
am) and the fellow in the role, J.J. Parkey, certainly could
out-dance me (in his sleep, even).
At the risk of appearing to be writing one of those damned
review things, the production had a good cast that also included,
Mary Farrow, Reneé Franck-Reed, Chris Harmon, Natalie
Houliston, Alexandra Morris, Jennifer Rittenhouse, Terry
Ronald, Michael Wadham, Roger Watson, and, as the munchkins:
Amanda Farrow, Gaby Farrow, Jonny Farrow, Ashley Potts,
Robbie Potts, Joy Rittenhouse, and Juston Rittenhouse.
With Jaguar as Toto. Playhouse Executive Director
Adam Leigh directed the production, and if my ears served me,
was the voice of the winkie.
- I already spent some time this morning on the Beard of
Avon script, studying John Heminge. What I did was drop
into Dino's coffee shop in
Yellow Springs,
grabbed a cup of coffee, then headed to
John Bryan State Park.
I must admit I stayed in my car, it's a tad chilly, but I
went through the whole play and tried John's lines out loud.
That will happen again today a few times -- perhaps not at
the park, but, still.
As of yet I do not know who else I will be cast as. One
casting configuration in the front of the book suggests that
the actor cast as Heminge also be cast as Lord Burleigh,
though looking at the script, there will be a couple places
where any costume changes from one to the other will be tight
because there is sparse time between one's exit and the
other's entrance; yet, it would be possible to execute even
if presenting a challenge. I have an email into Madame Lady
Director about who my other character will be.
We have our first read though tomorrow evening. As I may
have stated already here, rehearsals in earnest don't begin
until late January or early February.
- I also am going to spend some time today looking at
another play I may audition for.
- AND YET............
As I have stated before, between now and the earnest beginning
of Beard rehearsals, there is lots I can do that would
be productive artistic activity besides what I doubt would
amount to a substantial role in another play.
I have had a piece of sound editing software called CuBase
that my nephew David gave me months and months ago -- hell,
maybe a year ago, that I am actually going to finally install
on my Mac tower today. I have an album's worth of four track
work from the mid-eighties that I ought to dump into that
and begin mixing. This is the project that the song
"Rabid Rack," which I have already digitally mixed
for that music video, is from.
And, editing that music video is another thing that can take
up this time before Beard. Not to mention getting
back to the novel re-write,
sweetening the sound for the movie,
getting back to the screenplay for the longer short movie,
living up to my obligation to a few authors and actually
getting
On the Edge of the Pulsewave
posted.
- I also recently got the contact info for one the few
local actors' agencies, and I have have not yet approached them
about representation. That needs to happen now.
|
|
Wed, Dec 13, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
BEARD OF AVON
READ THROUGH: Had a good read through Monday night. Lots of snacks
and a pizza and other entrees. For the first cold rehearsal I
would say it went well. I had little handle on my character, well
characters (my second role is as Lord Burleigh). I experimented
with John Heminge some, so he was not read the same all night.
Also, as I was working on the script on Sunday I read Heminge as
more educated with a more Standard English dialect -- also
known as R.P. "Received Pronunciation." Problem: our
director, Ms. Randall, wants no one save for the Queen's court to
speak with R.P. Monday, I had difficulty keeping out of R.P. I
kept writing "East End" on my script at the top of pages
with Heminge dialogue to remind myself he needs a dialect closer
to the characters on East Enders.
It didn't work all that well. In February I will have John's
dialect down. Burleigh is foppish R.P. so was not a problem at
all.
THE AUDITION THAT WASN'T: I had serious thoughts about
auditioning last night for One Flew Over the Cuckoo's
Nest at Dayton Playhouse.
I was sick yesterday and spent most of the day in bed. I did
not feel up to leaving the apartment last night. I not sure who
I wanted to be in the play. I was going to read for the lead
role -- because why not? --
but really, I am not the right type for McMurphy.
Well, I am not too broken up about missing the audition. I have
that laundry list of other projects to get at. As I had intimated,
I was not wholly committed to the audition exactly because of all
this stuff I have to do.
|
|
Sun, Dec 17, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
REJECTED BY A BEATLE! ! !:
Ahh, alas, I finally got a copy of Paul McCartney's
A&E DVD for the
"US" concert tour in 2005,
The Space Within Us.
This was the tour where, at the Columbus, Ohio show in October,
the cameraman stood right in front of me and shot a close up of
me for at least a minute during, if I remember correctly,
"Drive My Car." I am sad to report that I did not make
it onto the DVD.
I have been rejected by an iconic,
living-legend, Beatle/Wings genius!
Or, at least by the editor of the film. Hey, if Dayton theatre
directors can make the wrong... -- uh, um -- go another way, I
guess a professional film maker can, too.
A POSSIBLE OTHER STINT AS PRODUCER AT
THE DAYTON THEATRE GUILD:
I have been approached about being the producer for a possible
special presentation at the Guild this coming spring. Although,
this is very preliminary and there is no green light just as of
yet, I have agreed to do it. I do hope it comes to be, because
it seems like it will be a great extra production for the season.
REITERATION OF A DISCLAIMER: I posted this last Thursday on my
"From K.L.'s Desk" at
the site proper, but believe it bears
re-posting here.
I was recently informed that a web site -- Webshots dot
Com -- has at least one page that deceptively suggests
that both I and an author who appears at the WriteGallery
have sponsored the page there. The page bears pictures of
another person identified with the same name as the WG
author, but who is not that author. The pictures are
risqué.
There is also a false link to the title of the
author's work at this site. I say false because the excerpt
presented is soft porn text that is not a part of the story
here. The link is actually not active, either. That would be
because if one were to click on the link and come to the real
story one would see it is not the soft porn prose that the
webshots page lies that it is.
The false link to the story and to the WriteGallery is in a
section entitled "sponsored links." Let me state
here emphatically that neither the WriteGallery nor the said
author are a sponsor for anything at webshots dot com, nor
do we endorse or recommend any page at webshots dot com. In
fact, to the contrary, I advise against the webshots dot com
web site and rebuke it as unethical and dishonest.
In short, webshots dot com is fraudulent in at least some
of its content.
|
|
Sat, Dec 23, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
SOME MORE THOUGHTS AS PER
THE BEARD OF AVON:
I am sure this will appear as some sort of disingenuous, fluffy
love-fest to some. (And it clearly matters to me at some level,
or I would not have bothered with the preemptive strike of
mentioning it). Still, I feel like writing this, and so here I go.
I'm much looking forward to Beard. The read through,
was, as I wrote already, pretty promising. It sounded good for its
early stage. The cast seems, at this young place in the production,
to be one that will work well together. We also have, I
whole-heartedly believe, a good director with some great visions
for the show and its presentation -- though I won't share those I am
aware of, because it's not my place to do so. We also have a good
producer in Carol Finley, who, in terms of theatre, is a proverbial
jack-of-all-trades and is extensively knowledgeable in most of
those "trades," if not all of them. She is a great go-to
producer.
As for our director, there is no denying that I am, as I have wrote
before, quite delighted to be a part of Natasha Randall's
post-collegiate directorial debut. I have a tremendous amount of
artistic respect for Tosha. She is, in my opinion, as I have made
known before, an excellent actor; beyond that, I find her
thoughts and ideas about the art and craft of acting, theatre -- and
movies, for that matter -- insightful and exceptionally valid. When,
last summer, I saw her name on the list of candidates to direct this
season at the Guild, I was immediately pleased and was one of
those not-too-few who spoke up in the board meeting to endorse
her as a good new director to introduce at the Guild. Most
especially is she a fantastic choice for Beard. The humor in
the script is a perfect match for her sense of humor. She also is
well-versed in Shakespeare; and I don't just mean she is schooled
in the text; she has a solid understanding of the true historical
context of the Shakespeare canon and the actors and audiences
associated with the original performances. There is already
bountiful evidence that this understanding is fruitful for our
production, based on what she has hence far shared about her
concepts for it.
There are a lot of cast members I am looking forward to working
with for the first time, and others I am glad to be working with
again. Our Will (Paul Edwards) was a cut above the script in the
season's second show, Pride's Crossing, and I remember
that he did a strong audition for Brooklyn Boy. Mark
Diffenderfer has not only beat me out for Ralph in Frozen
-- which I expected he would, but also has the role of Edward
DeVere, here -- which I wanted. My wounded ego must
begrudgingly accede he seems like a nice guy and certainly is a
talented actor. So I have
cancelled my plans to car bomb him. (Perhaps I should turn my
devious attentions on directors Reiter and Randall).
It's nice to work with Megan Cooper again (Anne Hathaway),
though we don't actually have any scenes together. I don't know
Matt Beisner (Henry Wriothesley & Earl of Derby) nor his
work, but he has a good rep and proves talented based on the
audition and the read through.
My John Heminge's side kick Henry Condel is Rene Vogt-Lowell
(who is also in the role of Francis Bacon). This is Rene's first
post-high-school production -- sort of like me when I did
Cripple, only with fewer
years between the high school and Guild shows, for him. I believe
he will do good as Condel/Bacon. Fellow DTG board member Harold
Fox is he who takes over the role of Old Colin (with the immortal
line in Act II: "Hath seen my
pussy?"), and he also is Francis Walksingham.
Queen Elizabeth is Reneé Franck-Reed. Too bad there is
not an opportunity for her to sing in this production; ah but still,
she already is lending great (speaking) voice to the queen.
Craig Roberts (not new to the DTG stage, re:
Cripple
and more) is the effeminate actor Geoffrey Dunderbread who plays
most of the women in the plays within the play; um, that is to say
that Geoffrey is the effeminate actor, not Craig.
Yet I will say that Criag's
"female" voices during the read though were
alarmingly authentic. Craig is a close friend, one
might even say, "a room mate of sorts," of the director
lady.
Our Minstrel is Mike Rousculp, and though I have never worked
with him, he gets spotted 50 out of 100 points simply because
he's a major Beatles fan and the bass player in the south-western
Ohio Beatles tribute band
Ticket To Ride.
He, a right-handed man, has even taught himself to play his
left-handed Hofner bass guitar in honor of Paul McCartney (who is
left-handed). Ticket To Ride will have an evening gig the day of
one of our matinees, so there are tentative plans for the cast to go
check it out.
Wayland Reid is Richard Burbage; Burbage being the star actor
of our theatre company within the play. Wayland is another,
new to the Guild, and during read though already had some funny
moments that prove he will be quite funny on Opening Night. One
cast member, Randy Fields, was not able to be there for the read
through. I don't remember him from the auditions, but that is no
reflection on him: there were a lot of new faces at the auditions,
many worth casting.
I look forward to this production. It is going to be a blast and I
believe a successful run for the Guild. We have a good cast and
crew -- which, by-the-way also consists of stage manager Steve
Strawser, who debuted at the Guild in that capacity for Pride's
Crossing, and is a great addition to the roster of production
people. And our costumer is Claudia Adelina, who seems like a
nice lady.
Okay! Enough already with the
spineless ass kissing, for the love of Pete!
Now I move into line study, beginning with the stage of the ol'
monotone speaking of lines onto a tape recording. A recording
which will be done in the next few days -- before I am off for
a little vacation (with my lap top in tow, of course).
SPEAKING OF SHAKESPEARE, HERE'S A BUMMER OF SORTS: The
Human Race Theatre Company
just sent out the brochure for forthcoming classes. I note that
Bruce Cromer is teaching a
class entitled Acting Shakespeare. The problem, the "bummer"
-- the classes are Wednesdays, February 14 through March 14. The
series ends during tech week for Beard. The schedule
conflict, especially in the last couple weeks of class, is not
reconcilable. I also note that I missed another session of this
class, earlier this fall, with Rocco Dal Vera at the helm.
|
|
Sun, Dec 24, 2006
Blog Index
Home
Latest Post
|
A Thought For You . . .
ANOTHER CHANCE TO SEE ME ACT AT
YOUTUBE --
GHOSTBUSTERS: SPOOK UNIVERITY
CLIPS POSTED THERE: So, now there is another chance to see me
act, this time in a short clip from the Ghostbusters fan film. I
believe this clip will stay up. The Not MY Courtney short
video was only up temporarily so the actors and crew could all
see it -- and its sister videos. But I am betting that the GB
clips stay up. I am in one titled Moving Out; it is from
close to the start of the film and is my character, Dean Schultz's
introduction into the story line.
Of course, the three ghostbusters, John Hibbard, Loren S. Goins,
and Jonathan Roberts (playing, respectively, Bill Venkmen, Byron
McClain, and Mark Nelson) are in both clips. Amanda Fire
(Samantha Hill) is the woman in the locker room in the other
clip. In my clip is also Ray Gambrell, the movie's casting
director as well as being heavily involved with
Playhouse South. The
delivery man is played by a tech from
WDTN Television, and I am
sorry that I don't readily know his name.
Here are the two clips (click on the titles):
Moving Out
Woman's Locker Room
BLUE(Z) CHRISTMAS: Finally saw Melissa Young's blues/rock band
B.B.Redd, again. Dropped in
to hear a couple sets at the bar J. Alan's in downtown Dayton
last night. If you remember, Melissa is the wunderkind actor
who took on two separate roles during different weekends in the
September 2005 revival of Sordid Lives at
The Dayton Theatre Guild.
She did great work with fairly little rehearsal. Well, Melissa
the blues singer still has it like she did months back at the
band's debut. As producer for The Dice House, coming up at
the Guild at the end of the season, I have warned Melissa the
actor that I will be soliciting her for the auditions in April.
B.B.Redd has, however, been gigging pretty steady.
|
K.L.'s Artist's Blog, (previously K.L.'s Blog: a Diary of
Artful Things), © 2004-2024 K.L.Storer ‐‐ all rights reserved
|
|
This website and all content © 2021-2024 K.L.Storer, unless otherwise stated ‐‐ all rights reserved
|
|